Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Coll Antropol ; 36(3): 801-6, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23213936

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to compare two different methods of frontal bone surface model acquisition. Three dimensional models acquired by laser scanning were compared with models of the same bones acquired by virtual replicas reconstructed from a sequence of computed tomography (CT) images. The influence of volumetric CT data processing (namely thresholding), which immediately preceded the generation of the three-dimensional surface model, was also considered and explored in detail in one sample. Despite identifying certain areas where both models showed deviations across all samples, their conformity can be generally classified as satisfactory, and the differences can be regarded as minimal. The average deviation of registered surface models was 0.27 mm for 90% of the data, and its value was therefore very close to the resolution of the laser scanner used.


Subject(s)
Frontal Bone/anatomy & histology , Frontal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Models, Anatomic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Anthropology, Physical/instrumentation , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Lasers , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...