Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Psychiatry Res ; 259: 579-586, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918860

ABSTRACT

General practitioners (GP), on the frontline for individuals with mental health problems, often deal with work-related common psychiatric disorders. We aimed to determine the prevalence of work-related common psychiatric disorders in general practice and associated patients' and GPs' characteristics. HERACLES, a cross-sectional study among 2019 working patients of 121 GPs in the Nord - Pas-de-Calais region in France. Common psychiatric disorders were assessed using the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview, patient-perceived psychological distress and GP-diagnosed psychiatric disorders. The work-relatedness of common psychiatric disorders was ascertained by the GP and/or the patient. Prevalence rates adjusted on age were calculated by sex and associated characteristics were ascertained using multilevel Poisson regression models. The prevalence of work-related common psychiatric disorders ascertained using the MINI was estimated at 25.6% [23.7-27.5], 24.5% [22.6-26.4] for self-reported psychological distress and 25.8% [23.9-27.7] for GP-diagnosed psychiatric disorders. Age, history of psychiatric disorders, consultation for psychological purpose and GP's characteristics were associated with MINI-identified psychiatric disorders. The prevalence of work-related common psychiatric disorders among working adults seen in general practice is high but further studies are needed to support this results.


Subject(s)
General Practitioners/psychology , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Practice , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Primary Health Care
2.
Euro Surveill ; 18(24)2013 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23787161

ABSTRACT

In May 2013, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection was diagnosed in an adult male in France with severe respiratory illness, who had travelled to the United Arab Emirates before symptom onset. Contact tracing identified a secondary case in a patient hospitalised in the same hospital room. No other cases of MERS-CoV infection were identified among the index case's 123 contacts, nor among 39 contacts of the secondary case, during the 10-day follow-up period.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Travel , Contact Tracing , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Fatal Outcome , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Respiratory Tract Infections/transmission , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , United Arab Emirates
3.
Occup Environ Med ; 65(8): 544-51, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18056749

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the potential health effects of the coarse fraction of ambient particles. The aim of this study is to estimate the links between fine (PM(2.5)) and coarse particle (PM(2.5-10)) levels and cardiorespiratory hospitalisations in six French cities during 2000-2003. METHODS: Data on the daily numbers of hospitalisations for respiratory, cardiovascular, cardiac and ischaemic heart diseases were collected. Associations between exposure indicators and hospitalisations were estimated in each city using a Poisson regression model, controlling for confounding factors (seasons, days of the week, holidays, influenza epidemics, pollen counts, temperature) and temporal trends. City-specific findings were combined to obtain excess relative risks (ERRs) associated with a 10 mug/m(3) increase in PM(2.5) and PM(2.5-10 )levels. RESULTS: We found positive associations between indicators of particulate pollution and hospitalisations for respiratory infection, with an ERR of 4.4% (95% CI 0.9 to 8.0) for PM(2.5-10 )and 2.5% (95% CI 0.1 to 4.8) for PM(2.5). Concerning respiratory diseases, no association was observed with PM(2.5), whereas positive trends were found with PM(2.5-10), with a significant association for the 0-14-year-old age group (ERR 6.2%, 95% CI 0.4 to 12.3). Concerning cardiovascular diseases, positive associations were observed between PM(2.5) levels and each indicator, although some did not reach significance; trends with PM(2.5-10 )were weaker and non-significant except for ischaemic heart disease in the elderly (ERR 6.4%, 95% CI 1.6 to 11.4). CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with other studies, our results indicate that the coarse fraction may have a stronger effect than the fine fraction on some morbidity endpoints, especially respiratory diseases.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Particle Size , Particulate Matter/analysis , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Air Pollutants/toxicity , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cities , France/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Particulate Matter/toxicity , Respiratory Tract Diseases/etiology , Urban Health
4.
Sante Publique ; 18(1): 71-84, 2006 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16676715

ABSTRACT

The relationship between air pollution and mortality is now admissible with a sufficiently high level of causality proven. This link allows for health impact assessment to be carried out with a significant degree of accuracy, such as the case for the results which are presented here from the nine French cities involved in the Apheis programme. This health impact assessment is based on the methodology developed by the World Health Organization. The number of avoidable deaths is contained between categories ranging from 2.0 to 4.3, 4.0 to 8.9, and from 15.0 to 31.5 per 100,000 inhabitants according to very short term effects, short term effects and long term effects, respectively. There are two scenarios which can be envisioned for the reduction of fine particles levels which are capable of obtaining similar results for both very short term and short term effects. The first involves diminishing the daily concentrations which are above 20 microg/m3 until they reach this value, and the second entails systematically decreasing the daily levels by 5 microg/m3. The first strategy of reducing values to stabilize at 20 microg/m3 has been shown to be the one most favourable and promising for the long term effects. This strategy therefore confirms the reliability and strength of the recommendation formulated at the national level.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Mortality/trends , Urban Health , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death , Cities , Environmental Exposure , France , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Models, Theoretical , Particle Size , Respiratory Tract Diseases/mortality , Risk , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Urban Population , World Health Organization
5.
Presse Med ; 33(19 Pt 1): 1323-7, 2004 Nov 06.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15615238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the short term effects of air pollution on mortality and hospitalisation for cardiovascular or respiratory disorders in the nine French cities (Bordeaux, Le Havre, Lille, Lyon, Marseille, Paris, Rouen, Strasbourg and Toulouse) of the Surveillance Air et Santé program. METHODS: Data were available on mortality and hospitalisation were available, respectively, from 1990 to 1997 and 1995 to 1999. Exposure data were the concentrations of sulphur dioxide, particles with a diameter of less than or equal to 10 mm, black smoke, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and carbon monoxide. The analysis assessed the relationships, in each of the cities, between the daily numbers of deaths and hospitalisations and the daily levels of polluting agents, taking into account confounding factors. A combined relative risk was calculated for all the cities. The number of deaths and hospitalisations attributable to air pollution was then estimated for each of the cities, based on the relative risk. RESULTS: Significant relationships were found for mortality, from whatever cause, and for hospitalisations for respiratory disorders in children aged under 15. If the levels of air pollution were reduced to 10 microg/m3 in the nine cities, 2800 premature deaths and 750 hospitalisations for respiratory disorders in children would be avoided, every year. CONCLUSION: Today, it is possible to assess the benefits of reducing air pollution in terms of health in the short term. These analyses would provide a sanitary dimension to the strategies for the reduction of urban pollution on local and European level.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/poisoning , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Mortality/trends , Population Surveillance , Public Health , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Collection , Epidemiologic Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged
7.
Rev Mal Respir ; 18(4 Pt 1): 387-95, 2001 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11547246

ABSTRACT

Time series studies conducted in the field of air pollution aim at testing and quantifying short-term relations which can exist between daily air pollution levels and daily health effects. The method used for this type of survey has sometimes been misunderstood mainly because individual factors and indoor exposure to air pollutants were not taken into account. The adjustment on these individual confounding factors commonly used in classic epidemiologic studies (case-control studies, cohort studies) is not adequate to times series studies which are based on aggregate data. This is different for those factors that change over time according to the levels of air pollution (meteorological conditions, influenza epidemics, trend of health cases) which, when being analysed, must be taken into account either indirectly through time modelling or directly through non-linear modelling processes. During this last decade, numerous studies using the time series method have been published and have found short-term associations between daily levels of air pollution commonly observed and daily respiratory mortality. The consistency of the numerous results published in the international literature are more arguments in favour of non-confounding short-term relations between air pollution and respiratory mortality.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/mortality , Urban Population , Adult , Aged , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Ecology , Female , Humans , Male , Meteorological Concepts , Risk Factors , Seasons , Smoking/adverse effects , Time Factors
8.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 49(1): 3-12, 2001 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11226914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims at quantifying air pollution effects on mortality and at evaluating the feasibility of a standardized epidemiological surveillance system of air pollution in 9 French cities. METHODS: Data collection and analysis followed a standardized protocol. Data pollution depended on the development of local air quality surveillance networks (number of indicators, number of stations.). The Generalised Additive Models (GAM) were used to quantify the association between air pollution and mortality. RESULTS: In the 9 studied areas, associations between all causes, cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, and air pollution indicators were observed. These associations were linear without threshold. Depending on the pollutants, excess in mortality related to an interquartile increase in acid-particulate pollution varied between 0.3 and 3.5% for total mortality, 0.5 and 6.3% for cardiovascular mortality, and between 0.1 and 12% for respiratory mortality. Photochemical air pollution varied between 0.4 and 7.3% for total mortality, 1.4 and 6.7% for cardiovascular mortality, and between 1.7 and 30.4% for respiratory mortality. CONCLUSION: In spite of a standardized common protocol, some disparities, inherent to the local characteristics, were noted (length of time series, numbers of ambient urban stations selected and pollutants available.). Nevertheless, this pilot study showed that multicentric epidemiological monitoring of air pollution effects on health was feasible. Yet, this requires to validate the results obtained through a re-analysis of the mortality data on a longer period of study. It also requires to study the feasibility and the relevance of the use of other health indicators, such as hospital admissions.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution/adverse effects , Air Pollution/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Mortality , Population Surveillance , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , Air Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Bias , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death , Data Collection/methods , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Epidemiological Monitoring , Feasibility Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Linear Models , Models, Statistical , Pilot Projects , Population Surveillance/methods , Respiratory Tract Diseases/mortality , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...