Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am Heart J ; 230: 25-34, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32980363

ABSTRACT

Smoking is associated with incident heart failure (HF), yet limited data are available exploring the association between smoking status and long-term outcomes in HF with reduced vs. preserved ejection fraction (i.e., HFrEF vs. HFpEF). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of HF patients undergoing coronary angiography from 1990-2010. Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and HF were stratified by EF (< 50% vs. ≥50%), smoking status (prior/current vs. never smoker), and level of smoking (light/moderate vs. heavy). Time-from-catheterization-to-event was examined using Cox proportional hazard modeling for all-cause mortality (ACM), ACM/myocardial infarction/stroke (MACE), and ACM/HF hospitalization with testing for interaction by HF-type (HFrEF vs. HFpEF). RESULTS: Of 14,406 patients with CAD and HF, 85% (n = 12,326) had HFrEF and 15% (n = 2080) had HFpEF. At catheterization, 61% of HFrEF and 57% of HFpEF patients had a smoking history. After adjustment, there was a significant interaction between HF-type and the association between smoking status and MACE (interaction P = .009). Smoking history was associated with increased risk for MACE in patients with HFrEF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.18 [1.12-1.24]), but not HFpEF (HR 1.01 [0.90-1.12]). Active smokers had increased mortality following adjustment compared to former smokers regardless of HF-type (HFrEF HR 1.19 [1.06-1.32], HFpEF HR 1.30 [1.02-1.64], interaction P = .50). Heavy smokers trended towards increased risk of adverse outcomes versus light/moderate smokers; these findings were consistent across HF-type (interaction P > .12). CONCLUSION: Smoking history was independently associated with worse outcomes in HFrEF but not HFpEF. Regardless of HF-type, current smokers had higher risk than former smokers.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , Heart Failure/etiology , Stroke Volume , Tobacco Smoking/adverse effects , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization , Cause of Death , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Ex-Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospitalization , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Non-Smokers/statistics & numerical data , North Carolina/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/etiology , Time Factors , Tobacco Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoking/mortality , Tobacco Smoking/trends , Universities
2.
Am Heart J ; 212: 72-79, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30954832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that neck circumference (NC) is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. Limited research is available regarding the association between NC and cardiovascular outcomes in African Americans. METHODS: Using data from the Jackson Heart Study, we included participants with recorded NC measurements at baseline (2000-2004). Baseline characteristics for the included population were summarized by tertiles of NC. We then calculated age- and sex-adjusted cumulative incidence of clinical cardiovascular outcomes and performed Cox proportional-hazards with stepwise models. RESULTS: Overall, 5,290 participants were categorized into tertiles of baseline NC defined as ≤37 cm (n = 2179), 38-40 cm (n = 1552), and >40 cm (n = 1559). After adjusting for age and sex, increasing NC was associated with increased risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization (cumulative incidence = 13.4% [99% CI, 10.7-16.7] in the largest NC tertile vs 6.5% [99% CI, 4.7-8.8] in the smallest NC tertile), but not mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or coronary heart disease (all P ≥ .1). Following full risk adjustment, there was a nominal increase in the risk of HF hospitalization with increasing NC, but this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio per 1-cm increase, 1.04 [99% CI, 0.99-1.10], P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of African American individuals, a larger NC was associated with increased risk for HF hospitalization following adjustment for age and sex, but this risk was not statistically significant after adjusting for other clinical variables. Although NC is not independently associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events, it may offer prognostic information particularly related to HF hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Body Size/physiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/ethnology , Neck/anatomy & histology , Risk Assessment/methods , Age Factors , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL