ABSTRACT
Background: There remains a gap in understanding post-sepsis outcomes, particularly regarding the factors that influence the quality of life (QOL) among sepsis survivors during and after hospitalization. Objective: To determine factors impacting QOL among sepsis survivors during and after hospitalization based on the evaluation and synthesis of current evidence. Methods: This review encompassed studies published from January 2020 to December 2024, sourced from Scopus, PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and Web of Science. The process of identifying, screening, excluding, and including articles followed the guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Data synthesis for theme generation was conducted using the convergent integrated analysis framework as recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results: A total of 1164 records were identified from the databases. After removing 130 duplicates, 1034 articles remained for screening based on their titles and abstracts according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. At this stage, 1021 articles did not meet the criteria and were excluded, leaving 13 articles eligible for full-text screening. During this phase, 5 articles were excluded for various reasons, resulting in eight studies being included in the systematic review. Data synthesis of these studies revealed seven themes related to factors impacting QOL among sepsis survivors during and after hospitalization: 1) Physical Health Dimension, 2) Mental Health Dimension, 3) Treatment During Hospitalization, 4) Spiritual Dimension, 5) Social Support, 6) Mortality, and 7) Blood Biomarkers. Conclusion: This systematic review provides valuable insights into the factors affecting the quality of life among sepsis survivors during and after hospitalization. These findings enhance the current knowledge base and offer clinicians, researchers, and policymakers actionable insights to improve outcomes and well-being for sepsis survivors.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy and user acceptance of telehealth in managing patients with chronic conditions, including continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). However, the rates of telehealth service use in various patient groups have been low and have declined over time, which may affect important health outcomes. Telehealth service use in patients undergoing CAPD has been recognized as a key challenge that needs to be examined further. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the rates of telehealth service use over 4 months, identify factors influencing its use, and examine the relationship between telehealth service use and health outcomes in Thai people undergoing CAPD. METHODS: This cross-sectional study, which was a part of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial study, was conducted at a dialysis center in Bangkok, Thailand. The study included patients who were undergoing CAPD. These patients were randomly enrolled in the intervention group to receive telehealth service and additional standard care for 4 months. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires, including a demographic form, Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Scale, Perceived Usefulness Questionnaire, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire, and Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36 Questionnaire. Additionally, Google Analytics was used to obtain data on the actual use of the telehealth service. These data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, repeated-measures ANOVA, and regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were included in this study. The mean rate of telehealth service use throughout the period of 4 months was 62.06 (SD 49.71) times. The rate of telehealth service use was the highest in the first month (mean 23.48, SD 16.28 times) and the lowest in the third month (mean 11.09, SD 11.48 times). Independent variables explained 27.6% of the sample variances in telehealth service use. Older age (ß=.221; P=.002), higher perceived usefulness (ß=.414; P<.001), unemployment (ß=-.155; P=.03), and positive illness perception (ß=-.205; P=.004) were associated with a significantly higher rate of telehealth service use. Regarding the relationship between telehealth service use and health outcomes, higher rates of telehealth service use were linked to better quality of life (ß=.241; P=.002) and lower peritonitis (odds ratio 0.980, 95% CI 0.962-0.997; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insights into factors impacting telehealth service use, which in turn affect health outcomes in patients undergoing CAPD.