Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(9): e14615, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817578

ABSTRACT

This study aims to investigate the value and determine the accuracy of spleen stiffness in predicting the degree of esophageal varices and bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.The age, gender, liver stiffness, spleen stiffness, and gastroscopy results of 124 inpatients or outpatients with liver cirrhosis and healthy volunteers, who underwent both gastroscopy and FibroScan testing in the fasting state, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the gastroscopy results, the patients and healthy volunteers were divided into six groups: varicose bleeding, severe varices, moderate varices, mild varices, no varices, and healthy control group. Then, the receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn, and the corresponding area under each curve was calculated and evaluated to predict the severity of varices based on the relevance of the area and its parameters.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of liver stiffness and spleen stiffness for predicting severe and moderate varices in the bleeding group was 0.955 and 0.989, respectively. The cut-off values were 29.6 kPa and 45.5 kPa, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of liver stiffness for predicting varicose bleeding was 0.860 (95% CI: 0.789-0.931). The liver stiffness cut-off value for predicting varicose bleeding was 33.2 kPa, with a specificity and sensitivity of 66.02% and 95.24%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of spleen stiffness for predicting varicose bleeding was 0.923 (95% CI: 0.875-0.971). A spleen stiffness cut-off value of 55.2 kPa had a sensitivity and specificity of 90.48% and 86.41%, respectively.Spleen stiffness can predict the degree of esophageal varices and bleeding in liver cirrhosis patients, and has good predictive accuracy.


Subject(s)
Elasticity Imaging Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/diagnostic imaging , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Liver Cirrhosis/physiopathology , Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Area Under Curve , Elasticity , Elasticity Imaging Techniques/methods , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/etiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spleen/physiopathology
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 23(44): 7875-7880, 2017 Nov 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29209128

ABSTRACT

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination of sufentanil and propofol injection in patients undergoing endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) for esophageal varices (EVs). METHODS: Patients with severe EVs who underwent EIS with sufentanil and propofol anesthesia between April 2016 and July 2016 at our hospital were reviewed. Although EIS and sequential therapy were performed under endotracheal intubation, we only evaluated the efficacy and safety of anesthesia for the first EIS procedure. Patients were intravenously treated with 0.5-1 µg/kg sufentanil. Anesthesia was induced with 1-2 mg/kg propofol and maintained using 2-5 mg/kg per hour of propofol. Information, regarding age, sex, weight, American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification, indications, preanesthetic problems, endoscopic procedure, successful completion of the procedure, anesthesia time, recovery time, and anesthetic agents, was recorded. Adverse events, including hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, and hypoxia, were also noted. RESULTS: Propofol and sufentanil anesthesia was provided in 182 procedures involving 140 men and 42 women aged 56.1 ± 11.7 years (range, 25-83 years). The patients weighed 71.4 ± 10.7 kg (range, 45-95 kg) and had ASA physical status classifications of II (79 patients) or III (103 patients). Ninety-five patients had a CTP classification of A and 87 had a CTP classification of B. Intravenous anesthesia was successful in all cases. The mean anesthesia time was 33.1 ± 5.8 min. The mean recovery time was 12.3 ± 3.7 min. Hypotension occurred in two patients (1.1%, 2/182). No patient showed hypertension during the endoscopic therapy procedure. Bradycardia occurred in one patient (0.5%, 1/182), and hypoxia occurred in one patient (0.5%, 1/182). All complications were easily treated with no adverse sequelae. All endoscopic procedures were completed successfully. CONCLUSION: The combined use of propofol and sufentanil injection in endotracheal intubation-assisted EIS for EVs is effective and safe.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia/methods , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/therapy , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Propofol/adverse effects , Sclerotherapy/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/instrumentation , Esophagoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Polidocanol , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Sclerotherapy/instrumentation , Sclerotherapy/methods , Sufentanil/administration & dosage , Sufentanil/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...