Characteristics and prognosis of EGFR mutations in small cell lung cancer patients in the NGS era

Purpose Targeted therapy has not been effective for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Although some studies have reported on EGFR mutations in SCLC, a systematic investigation into the clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics and prognosis of EGFR-mutated SCLCs is lacking. Methods Fifty-seven SCLC patients underwent next-generation sequencing technology, with 11 in having EGFR mutations (group A) and 46 without (group B). Immunohistochemistry markers were assessed, and the clinical features and first-line treatment outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results Group A consisted primarily of non-smokers (63.6%), females (54.5%), and peripheral-type tumors (54.5%), while group B mainly comprised heavy smokers (71.7%), males (84.8%), and central-type tumors (67.4%). Both groups showed similar immunohistochemistry results and had RB1 and TP53 mutations. When treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy, group A had a higher treatment response rate with overall response and disease control rates of 80% and 100%, respectively, compared to 57.1% and 100% in group B. Group A also had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (8.20 months, 95% CI 6.91–9.49 months) than group B (2.97 months, 95% CI 2.79–3.15), with a significant difference (P = 0.043). Additionally, the median overall survival was significantly longer in group A (16.70 months, 95% CI 1.20–32.21) than in group B (7.37 months, 95% CI 3.85–10.89) (P = 0.016). Conclusion EGFR-mutated SCLCs occurred more frequently in non-smoking females and were linked to prolonged survival, implying a positive prognostic impact. These SCLCs shared immunohistochemical similarities with conventional SCLCs, and both types had prevalent RB1 and TP53 mutations (AU)

Characteristics and prognosis of EGFR mutations in small cell lung cancer patients in the NGS era.

PURPOSE: Targeted therapy has not been effective for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Although some studies have reported on EGFR mutations in SCLC, a systematic investigation into the clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics and prognosis of EGFR-mutated SCLCs is lacking. METHODS: Fifty-seven SCLC patients underwent next-generation sequencing technology, with 11 in having EGFR mutations (group A) and 46 without (group B). Immunohistochemistry markers were assessed, and the clinical features and first-line treatment outcomes of both groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Group A consisted primarily of non-smokers (63.6%), females (54.5%), and peripheral-type tumors (54.5%), while group B mainly comprised heavy smokers (71.7%), males (84.8%), and central-type tumors (67.4%). Both groups showed similar immunohistochemistry results and had RB1 and TP53 mutations. When treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus chemotherapy, group A had a higher treatment response rate with overall response and disease control rates of 80% and 100%, respectively, compared to 57.1% and 100% in group B. Group A also had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (8.20 months, 95% CI 6.91-9.49 months) than group B (2.97 months, 95% CI 2.79-3.15), with a significant difference (P = 0.043). Additionally, the median overall survival was significantly longer in group A (16.70 months, 95% CI 1.20-32.21) than in group B (7.37 months, 95% CI 3.85-10.89) (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: EGFR-mutated SCLCs occurred more frequently in non-smoking females and were linked to prolonged survival, implying a positive prognostic impact. These SCLCs shared immunohistochemical similarities with conventional SCLCs, and both types had prevalent RB1 and TP53 mutations.

Combined small cell lung cancer: current progress and unmet needs.

Combined small cell lung cancer (CSCLC) is a specific subtype of lung cancer characterized by a pathological mixture of small cell lung cancer and any subtype of non-small cell lung cancer components. Currently, our understanding of the clinicopathological features, origin, molecular characterization, treatment, and prognosis of CSCLC remains limited. CSCLCs represent examples of intratumor heterogeneity and pose challenges for accurate diagnosis. Are there any distinct clinicopathologic and molecular differences between pure SCLC and CSCLC? Furthermore, the prognostic outcomes and optimal treatments for CSCLC are urgently needed. This article aims to summarize the current biological features and clinical management of CSCLC, providing a reference for further understanding of this heterogeneous form of small cell lung cancer.

Recurrent pleural effusion as a rare manifestation after prolonged PD1 inhibitor (camrelizumab)-based immunotherapy: A case report.

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) pose a significant challenge for the widespread adoption of immuno-oncology therapies, but their symptoms can vary widely. In particular, the relationship between irAEs and pleural effusion (PE) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. In this report, we present the case of an advanced NSCLC patient who developed persistent PE despite receiving camrelizumab (an anti-programmed death receptor 1 [PD-1] antibody) and chemotherapy as first-line treatment. While the patient's tumor biomarkers decreased after multiple cycles of treatment, the PE persisted despite negative findings on cytology and pleural biopsy. Additionally, the use of anti-angiogenic drugs failed to alleviate the PE. Screening for rheumatic connective tissue markers and tuberculosis yielded negative results, but intrathoracic dexamethasone injections in two doses resulted in a significant reduction of the PE. This case suggests that PE may represent a rare type of irAE that should be monitored for during prolonged immuno-oncology therapy.

A retrospective real-world experience of immunotherapy in patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has only made modest progress in the past decade, with two immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), atezolizumab and durvalumab, approved for the treatment of SCLC by January 2022. However, currently, there is limited real-world data on ES-SCLC patients received immunotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected and analyzed the demographic and treatment data of ES-SCLC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2017 to January 2022. Survival and prognosis information was obtained through follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 353 ES-SCLC patients were included, of which 165 received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as the first-line (FL) treatment (chemo-immune group), and 188 received chemotherapy (chemotherapy group). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of patients receiving immunotherapy as the FL treatment were better than the chemotherapy group (76.97% vs. 48.40%, p < 0.001, and 83.03% vs. 68.09%, p < 0.001). Moreover, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy as the FL treatment were better than the chemotherapy group (6.7 months vs. 5.1 months, p < 0.001, and 12.5 months vs. 11.2 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the OS of ES-SCLC patients who received immunotherapy as second-line treatment was better than that in the chemotherapy group (15.9 months vs. 12.9 months, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: ICIs combined with chemotherapy as the FL treatment could be beneficial to the ORR, DCR, PFS, and OS of ES-SCLC patients. Furthermore, ES-SCLC patients can benefit from ICIs in the second-line treatment, even if they had not received ICIs in the FL treatment.

A case report and literature review on respiratory failure with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a life-threatening adverse event.

Neuromuscular associated respiratory failure is a rare toxicity of immunotherapy for malignant tumors. In most cases, it may overlap with the symptoms of the primary disease or myocarditis, myositis and myasthenia gravis, resulting in difficult etiological diagnosis. Early detection and optimal treatment are still topics that need attention. Here, a case of 51-year-old male lung cancer patient with sintilimab-associated myasthenia gravis, myositis, and myocarditis overlap syndrome involving the diaphragm who developed severe type II respiratory failure was reported. After high-dose methylprednisolone, immunoglobulin and pyridostigmine intravenous injection with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, the patient's symptoms improved significantly and was discharged. One year later, the patient received immunotherapy again due to tumor progression. After 53 days, he developed dyspnea again. Chest X-ray demonstrated marked elevation of the diaphragm, and the electromyogram demonstrated dysfunction of diaphragm. With rapid diagnosis and timely treatment, the patient was finally discharged safely. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE was performed to identify all previously reported cases of immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated respiratory failure. The potential mechanisms of respiratory failure caused by ICI-associated diaphragmatic dysfunction may be related to T cell-mediated immune disturbances and we proposed possible diagnostic processes. For patients with unexplained respiratory failure who are receiving immunotherapy, standardized diagnostic strategies should be implemented immediately on admission before deciding whether to conduct a more invasive diagnostic procedure or empirical treatment.

Clinical impact of first-line PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients: A real-world multicenter propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVES: Our research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with etoposide and platinum (EP) for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and identify prognostic factors, as real-world outcomes and the inconsistency of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are uncertain. METHODS: We selected ES-SCLC patients in three centers and conducted a propensity score-matched analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted to compare the survival outcomes. We also performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to investigate predictors. RESULTS: Among 236 patients included, 83 pairs of cases were matched. The EP plus ICIs cohort had a longer median overall survival (OS) (17.3 months) than the EP cohort (13.4 months) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [0.45, 0.83]; p = 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was also longer in the EP plus ICIs cohort (8.3 months) than in the EP cohort (5.9 months) (HR, 0.44 [0.32, 0.60]; p < 0.001). The EP plus ICIs group had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (EP: 62.3%, EP + ICIs: 84.3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis presented that liver metastases (HR, 2.08; p = 0.018) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) (HR, 0.54; p = 0.049) were independent prognostic factors for OS, and performance status (PS) (HR, 2.11; p = 0.015), liver metastases (HR, 2.64; p = 0.002), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR, 0.45; p = 0.028) were for PFS in patients with chemo-immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data demonstrated that ICIs with chemotherapy as the first-line setting for ES-SCLC are effective and safe. PS, liver metastases, and inflammatory markers could serve as valuable risk factors.

A Risk-Scoring Model for Severe Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is one of the most common serious and fatal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The study sought to identify risk factors of all-grade and severe CIP and to construct a risk-scoring model specifically for severe CIP. METHODS: This observational, retrospective case-control study involved 666 lung cancer patients who received ICIs between April 2018 and March 2021. The study analyzed patient demographic, preexisting lung diseases, and the characteristics and treatment of lung cancer to determine the risk factors for all-grade and severe CIP. A risk score for severe CIP was developed and validated in a separate patient cohort of 187 patients. RESULTS: Among 666 patients, 95 patients were afflicted with CIP, of which 37 were severe cases. Multivariate analysis revealed age ≥ 65 years, current smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, squamous cell carcinoma, prior thoracic radiotherapy, and extra-thoracic radiotherapy during ICI were independently associated with CIP events. Five factors, emphysema (odds ratio [OR] 2.87), interstitial lung disease (OR 4.76), pleural effusion (OR 3.00), history of radiotherapy during ICI (OR 4.30), and single-agent immunotherapy (OR 2.44) were independently associated with severe CIP and were incorporated into a risk-score model (score ranging 0-17). The area under the model receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.769 in the development cohort and 0.749 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The simple risk-scoring model may predict severe CIP in lung cancer patients receiving ICIs. For patients with high scores, clinicians should use ICIs with caution or strengthen the monitoring of these patients.

Sintilimab with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world data study.

PURPOSE: The ORIENT-12 study demonstrated the promising results of sintilimab combined with gemcitabine and platinum (GP) therapy in squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) patients. However, the efficacy of sintilimab plus paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel and platinum (TP) in sqNSCLC is not yet known. METHODS: Real-life data were retrospectively collected from patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC who were treated with sintilimab plus TP (arm A) or sintilimab plus GP (arm B) between January 2019 and January 2021. Baseline characteristics, the efficacy of sintilimab, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included (arm A, n = 32 and arm B, n = 20). The overall response rate was 59.4% in arm A and 40.0% in arm B. The median progression-free survival was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-21.0) in arm A and 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.9-10.2) in arm B (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.25; p = 0.18). The median overall survival was 21.3 months (95% CI, 13.4-29.3) in arm A and 13.3 months (95% CI, 9.1-17.5) in arm B (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.28-1.36; p = 0.23). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 37.5% of the patients in arm A and 55.0% of the patients in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Sintilimab-TP may have similar clinical benefits compared with sintilimab-GP in patients with untreated advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. These results require further validation by prospective randomized controlled studies.

Safety and efficacy of immunotherapy rechallenge following checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced lung cancer patients: a retrospective multi-center cohort study.

Background: Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is one of the most fatal immune-related adverse events (irAE). However, only limited data are available on rechallenge with ICIs after CIP. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rechallenge after CIP in patients with advanced lung cancer to identify the potential populations that would benefit. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of advanced lung cancer patients who received further ICI treatment (rechallenge) or did not undergo re-administration after grade ≥1 CIP between May 2017 and May 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from first or second ICI initiation to disease progression (PFS1 and PFS2, respectively), death, or last follow-up (OS1 and OS2, respectively). The recurrence of CIP and new irAEs in these patients after ICI rechallenge were calculated. Results: Among 107 patients afflicted with CIP, 45 (42.1%) received ICI rechallenge. Multivariate analysis showed that severe grade (grades ≥3) and ground-glass opacity of pneumonitis lesions were negatively associated with rechallenge. Following rechallenge, 9 (20.0%) patients developed recurrent pneumonitis, and 11 (24.4%) developed a new irAE. Severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at initial CIP as well as levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP), and absolute white blood cell and neutrophil counts at the time of ICI rechallenge were associated with a higher recurrence rate. The median (95% confidence interval) PFS1 and PFS2 were 17.9 (9.9-24.2) and 15.5 (5.5-25.6) months, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) OS1 and OS2 were 23.5 (16.5-30.5) and 18.4 (10.1-26.7) months, respectively. Lower OS2 was observed in patients with severe grade of CIP and poor performance status at the initial CIP, recurrence of CIP, and in patients with high levels of CRP and IL-6 at rechallenge. Only IL-6 was found to affect OS2 on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: ICI rechallenge following CIP may be a promising treatment for patients with advanced lung cancer, particularly in those with low-grade of CIP and good performance status at initial CIP, and low levels of IL-6 and CRP at the time of initial challenge. Prospective studies are needed for further verification.

Immune thrombocytopenia in a small cell lung cancer patient treated with atezolizumab: a case report.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), an enormous oncological breakthrough in the last 10 years, have become the standard treatments for several types of solid cancers. Although ICIs are generally well tolerated and result in favorable outcomes, they also cause unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs) across bodily systems and organs. Compared to most common irAEs, which occur in the endocrine, skin, pulmonary system, and gastrointestinal tract, haematological irAEs (haem-irAEs) are relatively rare but potentially life-threatening events that are occasionally irreversible and refractory. Currently, haem-irAEs are not sufficiently understood, management, and lack consensus, while other common irAEs have well been characterized and managed. The reports of ICI-related thrombocytopenia in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are rarely seen. Hence, we reported a rare case of severe steriod-resistant ICI-related thrombocytopenia after received chemotherapy plus anti-PD-L1 inhibitor in SCLC patient. Our case exemplifies the diagnosis, diagnosis of exclusion, treatment, and prognosis of thrombocytopenia in the pattern of combination therapy, meanwhile, the subject of diagnosis, therapies, therapeutic strategies for refractory type and incidence, potential biomarkers, mechanisms and prognosis in ICI-related thrombocytopenia have been fully discussed. Case Description: Herein, we present a 64-year-old man diagnosed advanced SCLC developed refractory immune-related severe thrombocytopenia, who achieved favorable outcomes of cancer following chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab administrated. Routine blood re-examination on the third day of 6th therapy showed a thrombocyte count of 11×109/L. Combined the medical history and the results of laboratory tests, the diagnosis of ICI-induced thrombocytopenia was confirmed. Despite large doses of methylprednisolone, immunoglobulin, and rituximab, intermittent platelet transfusion, thrombopoietin being administrated to the patient, there were no signs of platelet count and hemoglobin improvement. Currently, this is the first case about atezolizumab induced thrombocytopenia in SCLC patient, while there is extremely rare haem-irAEs reported in SCLC. Conclusions: Although ICI-related severe thrombocytopenia is rare, it may persist or even be fatal. Clinicians should pay more attention to its diagnosis and prompt treatment. Once developed thrombocytopenia, large doses of methylprednisolone, ntermittent platelet transfusion, thrombopoietin should be timely administrated, also plasma exchange or rilzabrutinib, other immunosuppressive drugs, or IL-6 inhibitor warrant apply if steriod-resistant.

Proposed clinical phases for the improvement of personalized treatment of checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis.

Background: Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is a lethal immune-related adverse event. However, the development process of CIP, which may provide insight into more effective management, has not been extensively examined. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 56 patients who developed CIP. Clinical characteristics, radiological features, histologic features, and laboratory tests were analyzed. After a comprehensive analysis, we proposed acute, subacute, and chronic phases of CIP and summarized each phase's characteristics. Results: There were 51 patients in the acute phase, 22 in the subacute phase, and 11 in the chronic phase. The median interval time from the beginning of CIP to the different phases was calculated (acute phase: ≤4.9 weeks; subacute phase: 4.9~13.1 weeks; and chronic phase: ≥13.1 weeks). The symptoms relieved from the acute phase to the chronic phase, and the CIP grade and Performance Status score decreased (P<0.05). The main change in radiologic features was the absorption of the lesions, and 3 (3/11) patients in the chronic phase had persistent traction bronchiectasis. For histologic features, most patients had acute fibrinous pneumonitis in the acute phase (5/8), and most had organizing pneumonia in the subacute phase (5/6). Other histologic changes advanced over time, with the lesions entering a state of fibrosis. Moreover, the levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-10 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) increased in the acute phase and decreased as CIP progressed (IL-6: 17.9 vs. 9.8 vs. 5.7, P=0.018; IL-10: 4.6 vs 3.0 vs. 2.0, P=0.041; hsCRP: 88.2 vs. 19.4 vs. 14.4, P=0.005). Conclusions: The general development process of CIP can be divided into acute, subacute, and chronic phases, upon which a better management strategy might be based devised.

Identification and validation of a ferroptosis-related prognostic risk-scoring model and key genes in small cell lung cancer.

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive lung malignancy with high relapse rates and poor survival outcomes. Ferroptosis is a recently identified type of cell death caused by excessive intracellular iron accumulation and lipid peroxidation, which may mediate tumor-infiltrating immune cells to influence anti-cancer immunity. But prognostic value of ferroptosis-related genes and its relationship with the treatment response of immunotherapies in SCLC have not been elucidated. Methods: The RNA-sequencing and clinical data of SCLC patients were downloaded from the cBioPortal database. A ferroptosis-related prognostic risk-scoring model was constructed based on univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the risk-scoring model. And the correlations between ferroptosis-related prognostic genes and immune microenvironment were explored. The IC50 values of anti-cancer drugs were downloaded from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database and the correlation analysis with the key gene thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) was performed. In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was employed to detect the expression of TXNIP in 20 SCLC patients who received first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Immunotherapeutic response according to iRECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours for immunotherapy trials) were recorded. Results: We constructed a risk-score successfully dividing patients in the low- and high-risk groups (with better and worse prognosis, respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) of this risk-scoring model was 0.812, showing it had good utility in predicting the prognosis of SCLC. Moreover, ferroptosis-related genes were associated with the degree of immune infiltration of SCLC. Most importantly, we found that the TXNIP expression was highly correlated with the degree of immune invasion and the efficacy of chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy in SCLC patients. Conclusions: The ferroptosis-related prognostic risk-scoring model proposed in this study can potentially predict the prognosis of SCLC patients. TXNIP may serve as a potential biomarker to predict the prognosis and efficacy of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in SCLC patients.

Peripheral Blood Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis, Severity, and Prognosis of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially fatal immune-related adverse event that occurs during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, the roles played by peripheral blood parameters in CIP development remain unclear. Here, we aimed to identify which blood biomarkers correlated with the development and prognosis of CIP in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 87 patients with CIP (CIP group) and 87 patients without CIP (control group). Cytokines, blood routine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and albumin (ALB) were collected at baseline (before ICIs), at onset of pneumonitis (in the CIP group), and before the last dose of ICI (in the control group). We compared the baseline values and changes over time in various blood parameters between the CIP and control groups. The CIP outcomes were collected and compared according to the median values of these parameters. RESULTS: Squamous carcinoma (odds ratio [OR]: 3.02; p = 0.004) and ICI monotherapy (OR: 6.56; p = 0.004) correlated with a high risk of CIP. In the CIP group, interleukin (IL)-6 and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) at CIP were significantly increased relative to baseline. By contrast, IL-6 and PLR reduced over time in the control group. Significant decrease in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and increases in IL-10, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and LDH levels were observed from baseline to CIP. No significant change in these parameters was observed in the control group relative to baseline. ALB decreased in both groups, but the decrease in the CIP group was greater (9.21% vs. 2.44%; p = 0.020). High IL-6 levels (OR: 5.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-23.86; p = 0.033), and low levels of ALB (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04-0.64; p = 0.009) measured at the time of CIP symptom onset were associated with severe pneumonitis. Low concentration of IL-6 (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.03-0.95; p = 0.044) and high ALB levels (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.08-0.94; p = 0.040) were correlated with favorable overall survival in CIP. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in IL-6, IL-10, NLR, PLR, and LDH levels or reduced ALC and ALB levels were associated with the occurrence of CIP in lung cancer patients. High IL-6 and low ALB levels at onset of CIP were related to severe grade and poor prognosis of CIP.

Case Report: A Rare Case of Metachronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancers in a Patient With Successful Management by Switching From Anti-PD-1 Therapy to Anti-PD-L1 Therapy.

Without global standard diagnostic criteria, distinguishing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) from intrapulmonary metastasis or histologic transformation has been a big challenge in clinical practice. Here, we described a rare case of metachronous adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in a patient who developed drug resistance to pembrolizumab. Both DNA-sequencing and RNA-sequencing were performed on primary adenocarcinoma and resistant lesions. Through the comparison of primary adenocarcinoma and novel lesion mutation profiles, along with bioinformatic estimation of immune proportion by using RNA sequence data, we revealed the origin and tumor microenvironment of the two lesions. No shared mutations were detected between lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and SCLC from the same patient, suggesting these two lesions might be from separate primary lung cancers. Compared to LUAD, SCLC showed a relatively cold microenvironment, including negative PD-L1. The patient obtained durable clinical benefits upon treatment with atezolizumab, without experiencing immune-related adverse events. Disease progression should be monitored with prompt re-biopsy and molecular profiling to spot a potential histologic change and to shed light on therapeutic alternatives. The use of atezolizumab, either alone or in combination with other agents, may be a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with both LUAD and SCLC.