Investigation of a potential upstream harmonization based on image appearance matching to improve radiomics features robustness: a phantom study.

Objective. Radiomics is a promising valuable analysis tool consisting in extracting quantitative information from medical images. However, the extracted radiomics features are too sensitive to variations in used image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. This limited robustness hinders the generalizable validity of radiomics-assisted models. Our aim is to investigate a possible harmonization strategy based on matching image quality to improve feature robustness.Approach.We acquired CT scans of a phantom with two scanners across different dose levels and percentages of Iterative Reconstruction algorithms. The detectability index was used as a comprehensive task-based image quality metric. A statistical analysis based on the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was performed to determine if matching image quality/appearance could enhance the robustness of radiomics features extracted from the phantom images. Additionally, an Artificial Neural Network was trained on these features to automatically classify the scanner used for image acquisition.Main results.We found that the ICC of the features across protocols providing a similar detectability index improves with respect to the ICC of the features across protocols providing a different detectability index. This improvement was particularly noticeable in features relevant for distinguishing between scanners.Significance.This preliminary study demonstrates that a harmonization based on image quality/appearance matching could improve radiomics features robustness and heterogeneous protocols can be used to obtain a similar image appearance in terms of the detectability index. Thus protocols with a lower dose level could be selected to reduce the amount of radiation dose delivered to the patient and simultaneously obtain a more robust quantitative analysis.

A single phantom, a single statistical method for low-contrast detectability assessment.

PURPOSE: The assessment of low-contrast-details is a part of the quality control (QC) program in digital radiology. It generally consists of evaluating the threshold contrast (Cth) detectability details for different-sized inserts, appropriately located in dedicated QC test tools. This work aims to propose a simplified method, based on a statistical model approach for threshold contrast estimation, suitable for different modalities in digital radiology. METHODS: A home-madelow-contrast phantom, made of a central aluminium insert with a step-wedge, was assembled and tested. The reliability and robustness of the method were investigated for Mammography, Digital Radiography, Fluoroscopy and Angiography. Imageswere analysed using our dedicated software developed on Matlab®. TheCth is expressed in the same unit (mmAl) for all studied modalities. RESULTS: This method allows the collection of Cthinformation from different modalities and equipment by different vendors, and it could be used to define typical values. Results are summarized in detail. For 0.5 diameter detail, Cthresults are in the range of: 0.018-0.023 mmAl for 2D mammography and 0.26-0.34 mmAl DR images. For angiographic images, for 2.5 mm diameter detail, the Cths median values are 0.55, 0.4, 0.06, 0.12 mmAl for low dose fluoroscopy, coronary fluorography, cerebral and abdominal DSA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The statistical method proposed in this study gives a simple approach for Low-Contrast-Details assessment, and the typical values proposed can be implemented in a QA program for digital radiology modalities.

On the dependence of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging on scanner system characteristics and acquisition parameters: A large multicenter and multiparametric phantom study with unsupervised clustering analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multicenter phantom study was to exploit an innovative approach, based on an extensive acquisition protocol and unsupervised clustering analysis, in order to assess any potential bias in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimation due to different scanner characteristics. Moreover, we aimed at assessing, for the first time, any effect of acquisition plan/phase encoding direction on ADC estimation. METHODS: Water phantom acquisitions were carried out on 39 scanners. DWI acquisitions (b-value = 0-200-400-600-800-1000 s/mm2) with different acquisition plans (axial, coronal, sagittal) and phase encoding directions (anterior/posterior and right/left, for the axial acquisition plan), for 3 orthogonal diffusion weighting gradient directions, were performed. For each acquisition setup, ADC values were measured in-center and off-center (6 different positions), resulting in an entire dataset of 84 × 39 = 3276 ADC values. Spatial uniformity of ADC maps was assessed by means of the percentage difference between off-center and in-center ADC values (Δ). RESULTS: No significant dependence of in-center ADC values on acquisition plan/phase encoding direction was found. Ward unsupervised clustering analysis showed 3 distinct clusters of scanners and an association between Δ-values and manufacturer/model, whereas no association between Δ-values and maximum gradient strength, slew rate or static magnetic field strength was revealed. Several acquisition setups showed significant differences among groups, indicating the introduction of different biases in ADC estimation. CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised clustering analysis of DWI data, obtained from several scanners using an extensive acquisition protocol, allows to reveal an association between measured ADC values and manufacturer/model of scanner, as well as to identify suboptimal DWI acquisition setups for accurate ADC estimation.

Patient dose in angiographic interventional procedures: A multicentre study in Italy.

PURPOSE: The Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM considers interventional radiology to be a special practice involving high doses of radiation and requiring strict monitoring to ensure the best quality assurance programs. This work reports the early experience of managing dose data from patients undergoing angiography in a multicentre study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on a survey of about 15,200 sample procedures performed in 21 Italian hospitals centres involved on a voluntary basis. The survey concerned the collection of data related to different interventional radiology procedures: interventional cardiology, radiology, neuroradiology, vascular surgery, urology, endoscopy and pain therapy from a C-Arm and fixed units. The analysis included 11 types of procedures and for each procedure, air-kerma, kerma-area product and fluoroscopy time were collected. RESULTS: The duration and dose values of fluoroscopic exposure for each procedure is strongly dependent on individual clinical circumstances including the complexity of the procedure; the observed distribution of patient doses was very wide, even for a specified protocol. The median values of the parameters were compared with the diagnostic reference levels (DRL) proposed for some procedures in Italy (ISTISAN) or internationally. This work proposes local DRL values for three procedures. CONCLUSION: This first data collection serves to take stock of the situation on patient's dosimetry in several sectors and is the starting point for obtaining and updating DRL recalling that these levels are dependent on experience and technology available.

Surgeon eye lens dose monitoring in catheterization lab: A multi-center survey: Invited for ECMP 2018 Focus Issue.

PURPOSE: To perform a multi-centre survey on the eye lens equivalent dose absorbed by primary interventionalist during catheterization procedures, using a personal dosimeter placed close to the eye lens. METHODS: 15 different cardiologists working in 3 different centers, for a total of 5 operating rooms were enrolled. All of them were provided with a single thermoluminescent dosimeter positioned on the inner side of the temples of eyeglasses. The dose monitoring, performed on a two-months basis, started in 2016 and is still running. All dose measurements were performed by a ISO 17025 standard accredited dosimetry service thus providing certified uncertainties as well. Correlation of eye lens and wrist dose with KAP was also investigated. RESULTS: A total number of 101 eye lens measurements were performed. Annual eye lens dose estimation was obtained for all 15 surgeons (mean, mode, range, standard deviation: 10.8, 8, 4.9-27.3, 5.6  mSv, respectively). Uncertainties on annual eye lens dose estimations ranged between 10% and 20%. No significant correlation was found between eye lens dose and KAP. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiologists involved in catheterization procedures may receive annual eye lens doses close to the ICRP 118 dose limit and thus individual monitoring with a dedicated dosimeter should be carried out. Uncertainty assessment play a relevant role in eye lens equivalent dose estimation to ensure not to exceed dose limit.

Lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: A large scale multi-institutional planning comparison for interpreting results of multi-institutional studies.

PURPOSE: A large-scale multi-institutional planning comparison on lung cancer SABR is presented with the aim of investigating possible criticism in carrying out retrospective multicentre data analysis from a dosimetric perspective. METHODS: Five CT series were sent to the participants. The dose prescription to PTV was 54Gy in 3 fractions of 18Gy. The plans were compared in terms of PTV-gEUD2 (generalized Equivalent Uniform Dose equivalent to 2Gy), mean dose to PTV, Homogeneity Index (PTV-HI), Conformity Index (PTV-CI) and Gradient Index (PTV-GI). We calculated the maximum dose for each OAR (organ at risk) considered as well as the MLD2 (mean lung dose equivalent to 2Gy). The data were stratified according to expertise and technology. RESULTS: Twenty-six centers equipped with Linacs, 3DCRT (4% - 1 center), static IMRT (8% - 2 centers), VMAT (76% - 20 centers), CyberKnife (4% - 1 center), and Tomotherapy (8% - 2 centers) collaborated. Significant PTV-gEUD2 differences were observed (range: 105-161Gy); mean-PTV dose, PTV-HI, PTV-CI, and PTV-GI were, respectively, 56.8±3.4Gy, 14.2±10.1%, 0.70±0.15, and 4.9±1.9. Significant correlations for PTV-gEUD2 versus PTV-HI, and MLD2 versus PTV-GI, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in terms of PTV-gEUD2 may suggest the inclusion of PTV-gEUD2 calculation for retrospective data inter-comparison.

Quality assurance multicenter comparison of different MR scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging.

PURPOSE: To propose a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality assurance procedure that can be used for multicenter comparison of different MR scanners for quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six centers (35 MR scanners with field strengths: 1T, 1.5T, and 3T) were enrolled in the study. Two different DWI acquisition series (b-value ranges 0-1000 and 0-3000 s/mm(2) , respectively) were performed for each MR scanner. All DWI acquisitions were performed by using a cylindrical doped water phantom. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values as well as ADC values along each of the three main orthogonal directions of the diffusion gradients (x, y, and z) were calculated. Short-term repeatability of ADC measurement was evaluated for 26 MR scanners. RESULTS: A good agreement was found between the nominal and measured mean ADC over all the centers. More than 80% of mean ADC measurements were within 5% from the nominal value, and the highest deviation and overall standard deviation were 9.3% and 3.5%, respectively. Short-term repeatability of ADC measurement was found <2.5% for all MR scanners. CONCLUSION: A specific and widely accepted protocol for quality controls in DWI is still lacking. The DWI quality assurance protocol proposed in this study can be applied in order to assess the reliability of DWI-derived indices before tackling single- as well as multicenter studies.