Intussuscepted Metachronous small bowel tumor after treatment for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Small Bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignant neoplasm without specific signs or symptoms. It's been associated with late stage disease presentations. Midterm outcomes have suggested that after successful removal of colorectal carcinoma, there is higher risk for developing a further primary (metachronous) colorectal tumor. However when it comes to small bowel, metachronous carcinomas are unusual. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old female who underwent an emergency Hartmann's procedure two years previously and treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon at stage IIB with loco-regional recurrence. The patient presented with bowel obstruction secondary to a small bowel intussusception, confirmed by computed tomography. An emergent exploratory laparotomy was performed and confirmed of an ileal tumor as the cause of small bowel intussusception and clinical bowel obstruction. Histopathology confirmed a primary small bowel mucinous adenocarcinoma with node metastasis (T3N1M0, stage IIIB). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Patients who develop a small or large bowel adenocarcinoma have high risk of presenting a second tumor at both sites. Since data available to guide therapeutic decisions for patients presenting with small bowel metachronic tumors are scarce, the role of adjuvant therapy in patients who undergo curative resection remains unclear. The aim of this manuscript is present a case report of a patient admitted for a rare obstructive small bowel intussusception therefore underwent surgery for metachronic small bowel carcinoma from colorectal primary witch previously treated by surgery and adjuvant chemiotherapy. Studies about strategies for detection at an earlier stage, optimal treatment and prognosis are mandatory for this disease.

Pacientes quirúrgicos e intervenciones enfermeras estandarizadas. Estudio descriptivo sobre resultados / Descriptive study of the results of nursing interventions applied to surgical patients

Objetivos: conocer la evolución de los resultados de salud de los pacientes quirúrgicos durante su estancia hospitalaria, evaluando criterios de resultado NOC al ingreso y alta. Método: estudio prospectivo observacional realizado en las plantas de hospitalización quirúrgica del Hospital General de Vic, con pacientes que precisaron una intervención quirúrgica de cualquier especialidad, a partir de 18 añ;os, con niveles de riesgo anestésico I, II o III. Las variables principales de resultado fueron indicadores asociados a cada NOC de un plan de cuidados estandarizado, basado en el concepto «paciente tipo». Resultados: participaron 460 pacientes, de ellos 69(15%) fueron intervenidos de operaciones del sistema musculoesquelético y 391(85%) de operaciones del aparato digestivo, urinario y órganos genitales masculinos y femeninos, de operaciones de la piel, tegumentos y/o sistema endocrino. Las puntuaciones NOC al alta de todos los pacientes se mantuvieron o mejoraron, nunca empeoraron y en todos los pacientes el número de caídas y de infecciones recurrentes fue una constante. Prácticamente ningún enfermo se cayó, ni se infectó. Conclusiones: la mayoría de los pacientes quirúrgicos en el momento de recibir el alta hospitalaria mejoran o mantienen sus condiciones de ingreso y los que empeoran nunca lo hacen sustancialmente(AU)

Objectives: Knowing the evolution of health outcomes of surgical patients during their hospital stay, evaluating NOC outcome criteria at admission and discharge. Material and methods: Prospective observational study conducted in the surgical hospital wards of the Hospital General de Vic, with patients who required surgical intervention of any specialty, of 18 or more years old and anesthetic risk levels I, II or III. The main outcome variables were indicators associates with each NOC of a standard of care based on the "patient type" concept. Results: Four hundred and six patients participated. Of these, 69 (15%) were operated of the musculoskeletal system and 391 (85%) were operated on the digestive or urinary systems, male/female genitalia, skin, integuments, and endocrine system. NOC scores high of all patients were maintained or improved, never worse and in all patients the number of falls and recurrent infections was constant, virtually no patient fell or became infected. Conclusions: The majority of surgical patients at the time of hospital discharge improves or maintain their conditions of admission and patients who never worse substantially(AU)

[Descriptive study of the results of nursing interventions applied to surgical patients]. / Pacientes quirúrgicos e intervenciones enfermeras estandarizadas. Estudio descriptivo sobre resultados.

OBJECTIVES: Knowing the evolution of health outcomes of surgical patients during their hospital stay, evaluating NOC outcome criteria at admission and discharge. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted in the surgical hospital wards of the Hospital General de Vic, with patients who required surgical intervention of any specialty, of 18 or more years old and anesthetic risk levels I, II or III. The main outcome variables were indicators associates with each NOC of a standard of care based on the "patient type" concept. RESULTS: Four hundred and six patients participated. Of these, 69 (15%) were operated of the musculoskeletal system and 391 (85%) were operated on the digestive or urinary systems, male/ female genitalia, skin, integuments, and endocrine system. NOC scores high of all patients were maintained or improved, never worse and in all patients the number of falls and recurrent infections was constant, virtually no patient fell or became infected. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surgical patients at the time of hospital discharge improves or maintain their conditions of admission and patients who never worse substantially.

Concepto «paciente tipo»: utilidad para el cuidado de los pacientes quirúrgicos / The concept of “patient type”: utility for the care of surgical patients

Objetivo. Identificar y describir las necesidades y las características de los pacientes intervenidos de patología quirúrgica y describir un modelo de «paciente tipo» quirúrgico. Método. Se realizó un estudio transversal para describir un paciente tipo quirúrgico, formado por una o más tipologías con características y/o necesidades similares. La población de estudio fueron los pacientes ingresados en las plantas de hospitalización quirúrgicas de un hospital general, en un período de 10 meses. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, clínicas, grado de autonomía y necesidades según V. Henderson mediante una entrevista llevada a cabo durante el postoperatorio. Se realizaron análisis univariante, descriptivo estratificado y de correspondencias múltiples. Resultados. Participaron 270 pacientes de mediana o de baja complejidad, de diferentes especialidades quirúrgicas. Durante el proceso quirúrgico (preoperatorio y postoperatorio) casi la mitad de los pacientes se hipotensaban, la frecuencia cardíaca no sufría cambios significativos y no variaba el riesgo de sufrir úlceras por presión según la escala de Norton. Un primer análisis estadístico clasificó a los pacientes quirúrgicos en 5 grupos y mostró la relación existente entre el grado de autonomía mediante el índice de Barthel, y el número de problemas personales de los pacientes según el modelo de Henderson. Posteriormente, el análisis de conglomerados clasificó a los pacientes quirúrgicos en 4 clases o tipos que explicaban el 70% de la varianza total. Conclusiones. Se ha identificado mediante el modelo de Henderson un «paciente tipo» formado por 4 clases. Se plantea su uso para facilitar el cuidado de los pacientes de mediana o de baja complejidad quirúrgica de diferentes especialidades(AU)

Objective. To describe a model of surgical “patient type” by identifying the needs and characteristics of surgical patients. Method. We performed a cross-sectional study of surgical patients with one or more diseases and similar needs and/or characteristics admitted to the surgical wards of a general hospital over a 10-month period. The variables analyzed were sociodemographic and clinical data, degree of autonomy, and Virginia Henderson′s needs, which were identified through an interview performed in the postoperative period. Univariate analysis, stratified descriptive statistics and multiple correspondence analysis were performed. Results. A total of 270 medium- or low-complexity patients from different surgical specialities took part in the analysis. During the surgical process (pre- and post-operative), almost a half of the patients suffered from hypotension, heart rate showed no significant changes and the risk of developing a pressure ulcer was unmodified according to Norton's scale. The first statistical analysis classified the surgical patients into five groups and showed the relationship between the degree of autonomy (measured through Barthel's index) and the number of personal problems (assessed according to the Henderson model). A subsequent statistical analysis classified the patients into four groups or types, explaining 70% of the total variance. Conclusions. Through the use of Virginia Henderson's model, a surgical patient type composed of four different groups was identified. The results of this study may be useful in the care of low- and medium-complexity patients in distinct surgical specialities(AU)

[The concept of "patient type": utility for the care of surgical patients]. / Concepto <>: utilidad para el cuidado de los pacientes quirúrgicos.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a model of surgical "patient type" by identifying the needs and characteristics of surgical patients. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional study of surgical patients with one or more diseases and similar needs and/or characteristics admitted to the surgical wards of a general hospital over a 10-month period. The variables analyzed were sociodemographic and clinical data, degree of autonomy, and Virginia Henderson's needs, which were identified through an interview performed in the postoperative period. Univariate analysis, stratified descriptive statistics and multiple correspondence analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 270 medium- or low-complexity patients from different surgical specialties took part in the analysis. During the surgical process (pre- and post-operative), almost a half of the patients suffered from hypotension, heart rate showed no significant changes and the risk of developing a pressure ulcer was unmodified according to Norton's scale. The first statistical analysis classified the surgical patients into five groups and showed the relationship between the degree of autonomy (measured through Barthel's index) and the number of personal problems (assessed according to the Henderson model). A subsequent statistical analysis classified the patients into four groups or types, explaining 70% of the total variance. CONCLUSIONS: Through the use of Virginia Henderson's model, a surgical patient type composed of four different groups was identified. The results of this study may be useful in the care of low- and medium-complexity patients in distinct surgical specialties.