Inhibitory control in poker: Do experienced non-pathological poker gamblers exhibit better performance than healthy controls on motor, verbal and emotional expression inhibition?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Strategic games, such as poker, require gamblers to develop several skills to perform better than others and to expect a potential gain. Players must remain as unpredictable and unreadable as possible by inhibiting the expression of their emotions in response to both good and bad poker events. The aim of the present study was to compare several aspects of the inhibition process in experienced poker gamblers and controls to better understand how inhibitory control is involved in poker performance. METHODS: Thirty experienced non-pathological poker gamblers (EG) and thirty healthy controls with no or limited poker experience (HC) completed 3 cognitive tasks. Each task measured a specific type of inhibition: motor inhibition [Go/No-Go task], verbal inhibition [Hayling Sentence Completion Task] and expressive inhibition [expressive suppression task, which combines subjective, expressive (facial EMG) and physiological (skin conductance, heart interbeat interval, cardiovascular and respiratory activation) measures of emotional experience]. Linear mixed models with random effects were performed. RESULTS: Inhibitory control skills were similar between the two groups, regardless of the form of inhibition tested. The only difference observed in EG was a higher ability to partially suppress the physiological expression of emotion. However, this difference was only present for negative and positive emotional induction and was not maintained for emotional induction related to poker situations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The development of specific inhibition skills in experienced poker gamblers was not supported and raises questions about the transferability of poker skills previously discussed in the literature.

[General practitioners and the challenge of endometriosis screening and care: results of a survey]. / Les médecins traitants devant le défi du dépistage et de la prise en charge de l'endométriose : résultats d'une enquête.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the knowledge of general practitioners concerning the endometriosis diagnostic and care. POPULATION AND METHODS: Survey enrolling 100 general practitioners of the 76th Seine Maritime French department (region of Upper Normandy) who usually perform gynaecological follow up, asked to answer an irreversible 36 item step-by-step questionnaire. RESULTS: Among them, 44% perform more than one gynaecological consultation each week. They were 63% to feel ill at ease in the diagnosis and follow up of women presenting with endometriosis. One half of physicians could not cite three main symptoms of the disease out of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Only 38% of general practitioners perform a clinical gynaecological examination when they suspect the endometriosis, and 28% of them recommended MRI to confirm the diagnosis. They are 24% to refer the patient without delay, but only 52% to the universitary hospital, which is the tertiary regional referral center, while 68% of them refer to a fellow practicing in a private facility. They were 64% to believe that therapeutic amenorrhea is on the bottom of the medical therapy. General practitioners were more likely to accurately answer the questionnaire when they attended gynaecological advanced courses during previous 5 years and when they followed up more than three patients previously managed for endometriosis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: General practitioners' knowledge about endometriosis is limited, with possible direct consequences on the delay of the diagnosis. The attendance of gynaecological advanced courses and the exchange of information between gynaecologic surgeons and general practitioners who follow up the patients appear to be two-way to improve the accuracy of the answers to the questionnaire.