ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that neonates with symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and absent ductus arteriosus (ADA) have worse clinical outcomes compared with those with a ductus arteriosus (DA), and that this difference is driven by those born with ADA and with critically deficient pulmonary blood flow (CDPBF). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of neonates who underwent intervention for symptomatic TOF comparing death and reintervention between subjects with and without a DA identified on fetal echocardiogram or on echocardiogram performed in the first postnatal day. Exclusion criteria were as follows: inability to define DA status, collaterals supplying pulmonary blood flow, atrioventricular septal defect, and absent pulmonary valve. We defined CDPBF as undergoing a procedure to augment pulmonary blood flow on the date of birth or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation prior to such a procedure. RESULTS: The study cohort included 519 patients, among whom 11% had ADA. Patients with ADA were more likely to have a genetic syndrome and had smaller branch pulmonary artery size. In analyses adjusting for center, interventional treatment strategy, genetic syndrome, and minimum branch pulmonary artery size, ADA was associated with higher mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio of 2.37 (95% CI: 1.07,5.27; P = .034). Seven patients had CDPBF (1.3% of the entire cohort and 12% of patients with ADA). CONCLUSIONS: A minority of symptomatic TOF neonates have ADA, which is associated with higher adjusted mortality risk compared with those with a DA. CDPBF appears to be a rare but important entity in this population.
Subject(s)
Tetralogy of Fallot , Humans , Tetralogy of Fallot/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Infant, Newborn , Female , Male , Echocardiography , Cohort Studies , Ductus Arteriosus/diagnostic imaging , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early growth following primary or staged repair of neonatal symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of consecutive infants with sTOF who underwent initial intervention at age ≤30 days, from 2005 to 2017. Management strategies were either primary repair or staged repair (ie, initial palliation followed by complete repair). The primary outcome was change in weight-for-age z-score (ΔWAZ) from the initial intervention to age 6 ± 2 months. Secondary outcomes included method and mode of feeding, feeding-related medications, and feeding-related readmissions. Propensity score adjustment was used to account for baseline differences between groups. A secondary analysis was performed comparing patients stratified by the presence of adequate growth (6-month ΔWAZ > -0.5) or inadequate growth (6-month ΔWAZ ≤ -0.5), independent of treatment strategy. RESULTS: The study cohort included 143 primary repair subjects and 240 staged repair subjects. Prematurity was more common in the staged repair group. After adjustment, median ΔWAZ did not differ between treatment groups over the first 6 months of life (primary: -0.43 [IQR, -1.17 to 0.50]; staged: -0.31 [IQR, -1.31 to 0.71]; P = .55). For the entire cohort, ΔWAZ was negative (-0.36; IQR, -1.21 to 0.63). There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes. Secondary analysis revealed that the subjects with adequate growth were more likely to be orally fed at initial hospital discharge (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In neonates with sTOF, growth trajectory over the first 6 months of life was substandard, irrespective of treatment strategy. Those patients with adequate growth were more likely to be discharged from the index procedure on oral feeds.