Confiabilidad en ecografía muscular esquelética por evaluadores experimentados y novatos de cuidados críticos

Introducción: La ecografía muscular es una herramienta válida para monitorizar la pérdida de masa muscular de personas críticamente enfermas. El nivel de experiencia es clave para la precisión de las mediciones. Objetivo: Evaluar la confiabilidad interobservador de evaluadores experimentados y novatos midiendo grosor y eco-intensidad del cuádriceps y tibial anterior. Métodos: Estudio observacional transversal. Participaron 24 kinesiólogos de cuidados críticos; 5 experimentados (> 4 años de experiencia ecográfica) y 19 novatos (sin experiencia previa, por lo que recibieron entrenamiento de 16 horas). De forma estandarizada, cada evaluador midió ecográficamente el grosor (centímetros) del cuádriceps y tibial anterior de 10 modelos sanos y jóvenes usando equipos portátiles (transductores lineales y convexos). Se calculó el Coeficiente de Correlación Intraclase y el Cambio Mínimo Detectable (95% intervalo de confianza). Además, los novatos calificaron la eco-intensidad de 19 ecografías musculares de personas críticamente enfermas con la escala Heckmatt (calificación visual cualitativa) y se midió el acuerdo con los experimentados (Spearman Rho). Resultados: Se realizaron 960 mediciones de grosor muscular (experimentados = 200 y novatos = 760). La media del grosor del cuádriceps y tibial anterior fue 4,4 ± 0,77 y 2,4 ± 0,35 centímetros para los experimentados y 4,2 ± 0,80 y 2,2 ± 0,39 centímetros para los novatos, respectivamente. La confiabilidad de cuádriceps y tibial anterior fue 0,82 y 0,86 para los experimentados y 0,76 y 0,41 para los novatos. El Cambio Mínimo Detectable osciló entre 0,14-0,33 centímetros. La puntuación media de Heckmatt fue 2,6 ± 0,83 puntos, con una confiabilidad de 0,68 y una concordancia con los experimentados de 0,78 [p < 0,001]. Conclusiones: La confiabilidad interobservador de los experimentados fue excelente y la de los novatos moderada a buena. El nivel de experiencia podría determinar los resultados de confiabilidad.

Background: Muscle ultrasound is a valid tool to monitor muscle mass loss in critically ill patients. The level of experience is essential to the accuracy of the measurements. Aim: To evaluate the interobserver reliability of experienced and novice raters measuring muscle thickness and echo intensity of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior. Material and Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Twenty-four critical care physiotherapists participated (5 experienced and 19 novice). Following a standardized ultrasound protocol, each rater measured the thickness (centimeters) of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior of 10 healthy and young models using linear and convex probes of portable devices. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the Minimal Detectable Change (95% confidence interval) were calculated. Additionally, the novices scored the echo intensity of 19 muscle ultrasound images of critically ill patients using the Heckmatt score (qualitative assessment). The agreement with experienced raters was evaluated (Spearman Rho). Results: 960 muscle thickness measurements were performed (experienced = 200 and novice = 760). The mean thickness of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior was 4.4 ± 0.77 and 2.4 ± 0.35 centimeters for the experienced and 4.2 ± 0.80 and 2.2 ± 0.39 centimeters for the novices, respectively. Quadriceps' and tibialis' anterior reliability were 0.82 and 0.86 for experienced and 0.76 and 0.41 for novices, respectively. The Minimal Detectable Change ranged from 0.14-0.33 centimeters. The mean Heckmatt score was 2.6 ± 0.83 points, with a reliability of 0.68 and an agreement with the experimenters of 0.78 [p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Interobserver reliability was excellent for experienced raters and moderate to good for novice raters. The level of experience could determine the reliability of the results.

[Muscle ultrasound: reliability across experience levels in critical care physiotherapists]. / Confiabilidad en ecografía muscular esquelética por evaluadores experimentados y novatos de cuidados críticos.

BACKGROUND: Muscle ultrasound is a valid tool to monitor muscle mass loss in critically ill patients. The level of experience is essential to the accuracy of the measurements. AIM: To evaluate the interobserver reliability of experienced and novice raters measuring muscle thickness and echo intensity of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study. Twenty-four critical care physiotherapists participated (5 experienced and 19 novice). Following a standardized ultrasound protocol, each rater measured the thickness (centimeters) of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior of 10 healthy and young models using linear and convex probes of portable devices. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the Minimal Detectable Change (95% confidence interval) were calculated. Additionally, the novices scored the echo intensity of 19 muscle ultrasound images of critically ill patients using the Heckmatt score (qualitative assessment). The agreement with experienced raters was evaluated (Spearman Rho). RESULTS: 960 muscle thickness measurements were performed (experienced = 200 and novice = 760). The mean thickness of the quadriceps and tibialis anterior was 4.4 ± 0.77 and 2.4 ± 0.35 centimeters for the experienced and 4.2 ± 0.80 and 2.2 ± 0.39 centimeters for the novices, respectively. Quadriceps' and tibialis' anterior reliability were 0.82 and 0.86 for experienced and 0.76 and 0.41 for novices, respectively. The Minimal Detectable Change ranged from 0.14-0.33 centimeters. The mean Heckmatt score was 2.6 ± 0.83 points, with a reliability of 0.68 and an agreement with the experimenters of 0.78 [p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver reliability was excellent for experienced raters and moderate to good for novice raters. The level of experience could determine the reliability of the results.

Respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing: review of definitions and non-invasive monitoring tools for intensive care ventilators during pandemic times. / Impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio: revisión de definiciones y herramientas no invasivas de ventiladores de cuidados intensivos durante tiempos de pandemia.

Technological advances in mechanical ventilation have been essential to increasing the survival rate in intensive care units. Usually, patients needing mechanical ventilation use controlled ventilation to override the patients respiratory muscles and favor lung protection. Weaning from mechanical ventilation implies a transition towards spontaneous breathing, mainly using assisted mechanical ventilation. In this transition, the challenge for clinicians is to avoid under and over assistance and minimize excessive respiratory effort and iatrogenic diaphragmatic and lung damage. Esophageal balloon monitoring allows objective measurements of respiratory muscle activity in real time, but there are still limitations to its routine application in intensive care unit patients using mechanical ventilation. Like the esophageal balloon, respiratory muscle electromyography and diaphragmatic ultrasound are minimally invasive tools requiring specific training that monitor respiratory muscle activity. Particularly during the coronavirus disease pandemic, non invasive tools available on mechanical ventilators to monitor respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing have been extended to individualize mechanical ventilation based on patients needs. This review aims to identify the conceptual definitions of respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing and to identify non invasive maneuvers available on intensive care ventilators to measure these parameters. The literature highlights that although respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing are intuitive concepts, even distinguished authors disagree on their definitions.

Los avances tecnológicos de la ventilación mecánica han sido parte esencial del aumento de la sobrevida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Desde la conexión a la ventilación mecánica, comúnmente se utiliza ventilación controlada sin la consecuente participación de los músculos respiratorios del paciente, con el fin de favorecer la protección pulmonar. El retiro de la ventilación mecánica implica un periodo de transición hacia la respiración espontánea, utilizando principalmente ventilación mecánica asistida. En esta transición, el desafío de los clínicos es evitar la sub y sobre asistencia ventilatoria, minimizando el esfuerzo respiratorio excesivo, daño diafragmático y pulmonar inducidos por la ventilación mecánica. La monitorización con balón esofágico permite mediciones objetivas de la actividad muscular respiratoria en tiempo real, pero aún hay limitaciones para su aplicación rutinaria en pacientes ventilados mecánicamente en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Al igual que el balón esofágico, la electromiografía de los músculos respiratorios y la ecografía diafragmática son herramientas que permiten monitorizar la actividad muscular de la respiración, siendo mínimamente invasivas y con requerimiento de entrenamiento específico. Particularmente, durante la actual pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus se ha extendido el uso de herramientas no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores mecánicos para monitorizar el impulso (drive), esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio, para promover una ventilación mecánica ajustada a las necesidades del paciente. Consecuentemente, el objetivo de esta revisión es identificar las definiciones conceptuales de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio utilizadas en el contexto de la unidad de cuidados intensivos, e identificar las maniobras de medición no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores de cuidados intensivos para monitorizar impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio. La literatura destaca que, aunque los conceptos de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio se perciben intuitivos, no existe una definición clara. Asimismo, destacados autores los definen como conceptos diferentes.

Impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio: revisión de definiciones y herramientas no invasivas de ventiladores de cuidados intensivos durante tiempos de pandemia / Respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing: review of definitions and non-invasive monitoring tools for intensive care ventilators during pandemic times

Los avances tecnológicos de la ventilación mecánica han sido parte esencial del aumento de la sobrevida en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Desde la conexión a la ventilación mecánica, comúnmente se utiliza ventilación controlada sin la consecuente participación de los músculos respiratorios del paciente, con el fin de favorecer la protección pulmonar. El retiro de la ventilación mecánica implica un periodo de transición hacia la respiración espontánea, utilizando principalmente ventilación mecánica asistida. En esta transición, el desafío de los clínicos es evitar la sub y sobre asistencia ventilatoria, minimizando el esfuerzo respiratorio excesivo, daño diafragmático y pulmonar inducidos por la ventilación mecánica. La monitorización con balón esofágico permite mediciones objetivas de la actividad muscular respiratoria en tiempo real, pero aún hay limitaciones para su aplicación rutinaria en pacientes ventilados mecánicamente en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Al igual que el balón esofágico, la electromiografía de los músculos respiratorios y la ecografía diafragmática son herramientas que permiten monitorizar la actividad muscular de la respiración, siendo mínimamente invasivas y con requerimiento de entrenamiento específico. Particularmente, durante la actual pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus se ha extendido el uso de herramientas no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores mecánicos para monitorizar el impulso (drive), esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio, para promover una ventilación mecánica ajustada a las necesidades del paciente. Consecuentemente, el objetivo de esta revisión es identificar las definiciones conceptuales de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio utilizadas en el contexto de la unidad de cuidados intensivos, e identificar las maniobras de medición no invasivas disponibles en los ventiladores de cuidados intensivos para monitorizar impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio. La literatura destaca que, aunque los conceptos de impulso, esfuerzo y trabajo respiratorio se perciben intuitivos, no existe una definición clara. Asimismo, destacados autores los definen como conceptos diferentes.

Technological advances in mechanical ventilation have been essential to increasing the survival rate in intensive care units. Usually, patients needing mechanical ventilation use controlled ventilation to override the patient's respiratory muscles and favor lung protection. Weaning from mechanical ventilation implies a transition towards spontaneous breathing, mainly using assisted mechanical ventilation. In this transition, the challenge for clinicians is to avoid under and over assistance and minimize excessive respiratory effort and iatrogenic diaphragmatic and lung damage. Esophageal balloon monitoring allows objective measurements of respiratory muscle activity in real time, but there are still limitations to its routine application in intensive care unit patients using mechanical ventilation. Like the esophageal balloon, respiratory muscle electromyography and diaphragmatic ultrasound are minimally invasive tools requiring specific training that monitor respiratory muscle activity. Particularly during the coronavirus disease pandemic, non invasive tools available on mechanical ventilators to monitor respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing have been extended to individualize mechanical ventilation based on patient's needs. This review aims to identify the conceptual definitions of respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing and to identify non invasive maneuvers available on intensive care ventilators to measure these parameters. The literature highlights that although respiratory drive, inspiratory effort, and work of breathing are intuitive concepts, even distinguished authors disagree on their definitions.

Evaluating a Muscle Ultrasound Education Program: Theoretical Knowledge, Hands-on Skills, Reliability, and Satisfaction of Critical Care Physiotherapists.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate learning results of critical care physiotherapists participating in a muscle ultrasound (MUS) educational program. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A custom-made 20-hour MUS course was performed over a 2-week time period, including knobs familiarization, patient positioning, anatomic landmarks, image acquisition, and limb muscle measurements. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen critical care physiotherapists with little to no prior experience in ultrasound (N=19). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Theoretical knowledge, hands-on skills acquisition, and satisfaction were assessed. Inter- and intrarater reliability on landmarks, thickness, and pennation angle of quadriceps between participants was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Reliability among instructors measured prior to the course was also reported as a reference. RESULTS: The percentage score (mean±SD) of knowledge questionnaires was 69±11 (pre-course), 89±10 (post-course), and 92±9 (hands-on skills). Course satisfaction scores ranged from 90%-100%. Pooled interrater reliability of participants (median ICC [interquartile range]) was good (0.70 [0.59-0.79]) for thickness, moderate (0.47 [0.46-0.92]) for landmarks, and absent (0.00 [0.00-0.05]) for pennation angle and the intrarater reliability was good (0.76 [0.51-0.91]) for thickness and weak (0.35 [0.29-0.52]) for pennation angle. Interrater ICC values for instructors were excellent (0.90) for thickness, good (0.67) for landmarks, and moderate (0.41) for pennation angle and intrarater ICC values were excellent (0.94) for thickness and good (0.75) for pennation angle. CONCLUSIONS: Although our sample was quite small and homogeneous, increased theoretical knowledge, high hands-on performance acquisition, and good satisfaction of physiotherapists were observed. Reliability was moderate to excellent for thickness and landmarks and absent to weak for pennation angle. Landmarking and pennation angle remain challenges for physiotherapist training in the application of MUS. Further studies are needed to identify variables that could modify reliability during MUS training.