Reliability, validity and clinical usability of a robotic assessment of finger proprioception in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis often leads to proprioceptive impairments of the hand. However, it is challenging to objectively assess such deficits using clinical methods, thereby also impeding accurate tracking of disease progression and hence the application of personalized rehabilitation approaches. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate test-retest reliability, validity, and clinical usability of a novel robotic assessment of hand proprioceptive impairments in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). METHODS: The assessment was implemented in an existing one-degree of freedom end-effector robot (ETH MIKE) acting on the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint. It was performed by 45 pwMS and 59 neurologically intact controls. Additionally, clinical assessments of somatosensation, somatosensory evoked potentials and usability scores were collected in a subset of pwMS. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability of robotic task metrics in pwMS was good (ICC=0.69-0.87). The task could identify individuals with impaired proprioception, as indicated by the significant difference between pwMS and controls, as well as a high impairment classification agreement with a clinical measure of proprioception (85.00-86.67%). Proprioceptive impairments were not correlated with other modalities of somatosensation. The usability of the assessment system was satisfactory (System Usability Scale ≥73.10). CONCLUSION: The proposed assessment is a promising alternative to commonly used clinical methods and will likely contribute to a better understanding of proprioceptive impairments in pwMS.

Performance of Activities of daily living in people with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) may result in activity and participation limitations, including the performance of activities of daily living (ADL). This study aims at systematically investigate ADL performance by using Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) in people with MS (PwMS) of all disease types and within the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) range from 1.0 - 8.0. METHODS: Eight multiple sclerosis (MS) centres participated in data collection of a consecutive sample of PwMS. Participants were referred for assessment to occupational therapy (OT) by treating physician or recruited from neurology department in each hospital and assessed by EDSS and AMPS. The AMPS is an observational, criterion referenced ADL assessment, providing values for a person's ADL performance in terms of motor and process skills. Criterion referenced cut-off scores were established at 2.0 for motor skills and at 1.0 for process skills and both values above the cut-off score indicate competent (independent, safe, efficient and effortless) ADL performance. Process skills refer to the act of carrying out a series of actions and is summarized in terms of efficiency, like initiating without pauses, continuing actions through to completion, performing actions in logical order (sequences), choosing, and completing the task as planned (heeds). RESULTS: Two hundred and ten PwMS were recruited (48 +/- 13 years of age, 145 women/65 men, average disease duration was 11.8 +/- 9.6 years, average EDSS was 4.8+/-1.8). Average motor skills score was 1.01+/- 1.12 (indicating need for assistance with evidence of increased clumsiness/physical effort) and average process skills score was 1.02 +/- 0.66 (risk zone, questionable efficiency and more likely to need assistance). Overall, motor skills and process skills decreased with increasing EDSS score. No need for assistance in motor skills was indicated in subjects with lower EDSS scores (1.0 - 2.5). In higher EDSS group (≥4.5), 57% of subjects needed assistance in motor skills and 27% in process skills. The competency in process skills was either questionable or reduced within all EDSS scores. However, 33-38% of subjects with higher EDSS scores (6.0-8.5) showed competent performance in process skills. Overall correlation between motor and process scores was moderate (r = 0.56, p<0.0001), but no significant relationships between motor and process skills were found in the lower EDSS (1-2.5) and high EDSS scores (8-8.5). Further, EDSS and disease type were significant predictors, explaining 52.7% of motor skills and 22.3% of process skills performance. CONCLUSION: Problems in ADL performance were found in EDSS categories 1.0 to 8.0 and in all disease types, therefore it is advisable to screen all PwMS for ADL deficits and provide relevant rehabilitation interventions.

What is the distribution of trunk impairments and its relationship with disability level in individuals with multiple sclerosis?

BACKGROUND: Trunk control is essential for movement, balance and walking and is ignored in the regular medical follow-up. OBJECTIVE: First, to describe the distribution of trunk impairments in the full range of disability levels in individuals with MS. Second, to identify the relationship between trunk control, measured by the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS 2.0.), and general disability measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). METHODS: 154 individuals with MS were included (mean age 53.6; SD 11.06), EDSS ranging from 1.0- 8.5 (mean 4.47; SD 2.55). The relationship between EDSS and TIS 2.0. was calculated by Spearman correlation coefficient for the total sample and subgroups, EDSS ≤ 4 versus EDSS ≥ 4.5. RESULTS: Trunk impairments were detected throughout the full range of disability, including individuals with low disability. Pelvic elevation and lower trunk rotation appeared most difficult to perform. In the total sample, a moderate correlation was found (rho= -0.608**) between disability (EDSS) and trunk performance (TIS 2.0.). Sub-analyses revealed a poor correlation (rho= -0.193) for the EDSS ≤ 4 subgroup and a strong correlation for the EDSS ≥ 4.5 subgroup (rho= -0.712**). CONCLUSION: The results advocate for including trunk assessment already at early disease stages of MS, particularly of pelvic elevation and trunk rotation, and dedicated rehabilitation strategies.

The content and effects of trunk rehabilitation on trunk and upper limb performance in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) could have an impaired trunk and reduced postural control, which negatively impacts activities of daily living. Evidence is growing to consider the positive effects of trunk training on fall incidence and balance problems. Effects on trunk and upper limb performance is unknown. This systematic review provides an overview of trunk training programs and their effects in MS, specifically focusing on the content of training modalities and the effects on trunk and upper limb performance. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Two electronic databases were used: PubMed and Web Of Science (WOS). Intervention studies (with- and without control group) published in English, investigating the effects of active trunk training on trunk and upper limb performance in pwMS, were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Sixteen studies met the criteria, investigating different rehabilitation modalities. The included interventions in the review varied between more generic postural interventions such as Pilates (N.=8) and Ai Chi (N.=1), with a focus on abdominal muscle activation, breathing, neutral position and lower extremity movements. Further, specifically developed trunk training programs like GroupCoreDIST/ SIT / CoDuSe (N.=6) and Bobath based trunk training (N.=1) are detected, with the main focus on trunk strengthening and dynamic movements. An overall improvement in trunk performance was reported in several tests on trunk strength, stability and coordination. While the majority of the programs integrated the upper limb, only half of them used upper limb outcome measures to evaluate the effect. Here, overall significant improvements were found for the upper limb. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed that different types of trunk training programs can improve trunk and upper limb function in PwMS. The findings of this review suggest that a focus on trunk training to achieve effects on upper limb is reasonable. Future research is needed to further explore relations and the effect sizes.

Systematic evaluation of the guidelines for rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis patients: an overview according to ICF functioning domains.

High-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing care on managing multiple sclerosis (MS). There is currently no review that compiles recommendations of high-quality CPGs to guide decision-making for MS rehabilitation. The aim was to identify evidence-based recommendations in high-quality multidisciplinary English CPGs for rehabilitation in MS. CPGs published in the last 10 years (2009-2019) that described recommendations on rehabilitation were searched in PubMed, Turning Research into Practice database, International Guideline databases, National Guideline databases and websites of MS organizations. Quality assessment of CPGs was conducted by two evaluators using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Recommendations were classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the International Classification of Health Intervention (ICHI) and documented in terms of strength of recommendation and level of evidence. Five CPGs satisfied the inclusion criteria. Of 120 recommendations, 38 had a strong level with moderate to low level of evidence, 61 were of weak strength and 18 were formulated by the consensus of experts. Recommendations were categorized into 12 domains and 1 chapter on the body function level, 1 chapter on activity level and 2 domains on external factors. The existing CPGs demonstrated more than 100 evidence level recommendations to be followed at the clinical practice, most in body functions of the ICF. Developing up-to-date CPGs with more focus on activity and participation domains for countries with various healthcare backgrounds may be useful for a best clinical practice.

Differential effects and discriminative validity of motor and cognitive tasks varying in difficulty on cognitive-motor interference in persons with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-motor interference (CMI) has been well recognized in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS); however, there are limited data on effects of task difficulty. OBJECTIVE: Examine (1) the effects of motor and cognitive tasks varying in difficulty on the magnitude of CMI and (2) the discriminative validity of CMI between pwMS and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Nine cognitive-motor dual-task (DT) conditions (combinations of three cognitive and three walking tasks) were examined. Outcome measures were DT-performance and dual-task cost (DTC) of gait parameters and correct answers. Task differences and overall group-effects were analysed by mixed model analysis, plus the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests or multivariate analysis of variances (MANOVAs), respectively. RESULTS: Task effects were examined in 82 pwMS (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS): 3.3 ± 1.0) and discriminative validity in a subsample (35 pwMS and 33 HC). Motor-DTC and DT-performance were affected by difficulty of both the cognitive task (p < 0.001) and the walking condition (p ⩽ 0.002), while cognitive-DTC only varied between cognitive tasks with a large difference in difficulty (p ⩽ 0.005) and not between walking conditions (p ⩾ 0.125). None of the DTCs differed between groups. CONCLUSION: CMI, and especially motor performance, is affected by difficulty of the DT. Although pwMS performed worse on the tasks than HC, none of the DT-conditions showed a discriminative DTC.

Structured Cognitive-Motor Dual Task Training Compared to Single Mobility Training in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis, a Multicenter RCT.

The aim was to compare the effectiveness of dual-task training (DTT) compared to single mobility training (SMT) on dual-task walking, mobility and cognition, in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Forty pwMS were randomly assigned to the DTT or SMT groups. The DTT-group performed dual-task exercises using an interactive tablet-based application, while the SMT-group received conventional walking and balance exercises. Both interventions were supervised and identical in weeks (8) and sessions (20). Nine cognitive-motor dual-task conditions were assessed at baseline, after intervention and at 4-weeks follow-up (FU). The dual-task cost (DTC), percentage change of dual-task performance compared to single-task performance, was the primary outcome. Mobility and cognition were secondarily assessed. Mixed model analyses were done with group, time and the interaction between group and time as fixed factors and participants as random factors. Significant time by group interactions were found for the digit-span walk and subtraction walk dual-task conditions, with a reduction in DTC (gait speed) for the DTT maintained at FU. Further, absolute dual-task gait speed during walking over obstacles only improved after the DTT. Significant improvements were found for both groups in various motor and cognitive measures. However, the DTT led to better dual-task walking compared to the SMT.

Design and Characterization of a Robotic Device for the Assessment of Hand Proprioceptive, Motor, and Sensorimotor Impairments.

Hand function is often impaired after neurological injuries such as stroke. In order to design patient-specific rehabilitation, it is essential to quantitatively assess those deficits. Current clinical scores cannot provide the required level of detail, and most assessment devices have been developed for the proximal joints of the upper limb. This paper presents a new robotic platform for the assessment of proprioceptive, motor, and sensorimotor hand impairments. A detailed technical evaluation demonstrated the capabilities to render different haptic environments required for a comprehensive assessment battery, and showed that the device is suitable for human interaction due to its ergonomic design. A preliminary study on proprioceptive assessment using a gauge position matching task with one healthy, one stroke, and one multiple sclerosis subject showed that the robotic system is able to rapidly and sensitively quantify proprioceptive deficits, and has the potential to be integrated into the clinical settings.

Intensity-dependent clinical effects of an individualized technology-supported task-oriented upper limb training program in Multiple Sclerosis: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Task-oriented training promotes functional recovery in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Know-how to determine an individualized training intensity and intensity-dependent effects are, however, unknown. The objective of the study was to investigate the feasibility and the clinical effects of a task-oriented upper limb training program at different individualized training intensities with conventional occupational therapy. METHODS: People with MS (n = 20, EDSS range 4-8) were divided into three groups, receiving task-oriented training at 100% (n = 7) or 50% (n = 8) of their individual maximal number of repetitions, or conventional occupational therapy (n = 5). Effects were evaluated using different upper limb capacity and perceived performance measures on activity level, and measures on body functions and structures level. RESULTS: Mixed model analyses revealed significant improvements (p < 0.05) over time on the Box and block test (BBT), Action Research Arm Test and the Manual Ability Measure-36. Significant interaction effects (group*time) in favor of the task-oriented group training at the highest intensity were found for BBT and static fatigue index during a maximal sustained handgrip strength test. CONCLUSION: All participants were able to perform the task-oriented training at their individualized intensity without any adverse effects. Several improvements over time were found for all intervention groups, however the results suggest a superiority of task-oriented training at 100%. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ON CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: = NCT02688231.

Cognitive-motor interference in persons with multiple sclerosis during five upper limb motor tasks with different complexity.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-motor interference in multiple sclerosis has been well examined during walking, but not during upper limb (UL) performance. OBJECTIVES: To examine the dual-task cost (DTC) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and healthy controls (HC) in various type and complexity of UL motor tasks. METHOD: In total, 30 pwMS without major UL impairment and 30 HC performed five different UL tasks, in single condition and combined with the phonemic word list generation task. The percent change in performances was evaluated by the motor, cognitive, and combined DTC. The motor tasks consisted of four unimanual (sustained hand grip strength, box-and-block test, Purdue pegboard test, finger tapping task) and one bimanual task (Purdue pegboard test). Group and task differences were analyzed with unpaired and paired t-tests, respectively, and overall effect with a multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: The motor DTC ranged between 10% (Purdue pegboard bimanual) and 35% (box-and-block test). The cognitive DTC ranged between -8% (finger tapping test) and +21% (bimanual Purdue pegboard). The magnitude of the combined DTC did not differ significantly between pwMS and HC in any task. CONCLUSION: DTC is influenced by the complexity of the UL task, but was not significantly different between HC and cognitive intact, but mildly motor disabled pwMS.

Perceived and actual arm performance in multiple sclerosis: relationship with clinical tests according to hand dominance.

BACKGROUND: The real-life relevance of frequently applied clinical arm tests is not well known in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the relation between real-life arm performance and clinical tests in MS. METHODS: Thirty wheelchair-bound MS patients and 30 healthy controls were included. Actual and perceived real-life arm performance was measured by using accelerometry and a self-reported measure (Motor Activity Log). Clinical tests on 'body functions & structures' (JAMAR handgrip strength, Motricity Index (MI), Fugl Meyer (FM)) and 'activity' level (Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Action Research Arm test) of the International Classification of Functioning were conducted. Statistical analyses were performed separately for current dominant and non-dominant arm. RESULTS: For all outcome measures, MS patients scored with both arms significantly lower than the control group. Higher correlations between actual arm performance and clinical tests were found for the non-dominant arm (0.63-0.80). The FM (55%) was a good predictor of actual arm performance, while the MI (46%) and NHPT (55%) were good predictors of perceived arm performance. CONCLUSIONS: Real-life arm performance is decreased in wheelchair-bound MS patients and can be best predicted by measures on 'body functions & structures' level and fine motor control. Hand dominance influenced the magnitude of relationships.