Biomechanics of internal fixation in Hoffa fractures - A comparison of four different constructs.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the biomechanical effectiveness of four different bone-implant constructs in preventing fracture displacement under axial loading. METHODS: Twenty artificial femora had a standardized coronally oriented fracture of the lateral femoral condyle, representing a Hoffa fracture classified as a Letenneur type I. Four different fixation constructs were applied to the synthetic bones for biomechanical testing. The constructs consisted of a posterolateral (PL) buttressing locking plate in conjunction with two cannulated lag screws inserted from posterior to anterior (PA) - Group 1; Two cannulated screws inserted from anterior to posterior (AP) without plating- Group 2; A posterolateral (PL) buttressing locking plate in isolation - Group 3; and a combination of two lag screws from anterior to posterior (AP) in addition to a horizontal one-third tubular locking plate - Group 4. An axial load was applied to the fracture site with a constant displacement speed of 20 mm/min, and the test was interrupted when a secondary displacement was detected determining a fixation failure. We recorded the maximum applied force and the maximum fracture displacement values. RESULTS: Group 1 demonstrated the highest overall bone-implant axial stiffness with the lowest secondary displacement under loading. Groups 3 and 4 showed equivalent mechanical behavior. Group 2 presented the lowest mechanical stiffness to axial loading. The combination of the one-third tubular locking plate with anterior-to-posterior lag screws (Group 4) resulted in 302 % increase in fixation stiffness when compared to anterior-to-posterior lag screws only (Group 2). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the mechanical superiority of having a plate applied parallel to the main fracture plane in the setting of coronally oriented femoral condyle fractures. The addition of a horizontal plate, perpendicular to the main fracture plane, significantly increased the resistance to shearing forces at the fracture site when compared to constructs adopting just cannulated screws. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Biomechanical study.

Busch-Hoffa fracture: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Accomplish a thorough review on the existing biomechanical and clinical studies about coronal plane fractures of the distal femur. METHODS: We performed an electronic search of PubMed/MEDLINE database from April to June, 2023. The terms for the database search included "Hoffa fractures," OR "Busch-Hoffa fractures" OR "coronal plane fractures of the distal femur." RESULTS: The search identified 277 potentially eligible studies. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 113 articles were analyzed in terms of the most important topics related to coronal plane fractures of the distal femur. CONCLUSION: Lateral coronal plane fractures of the distal femur are more frequent than medial, present a more vertical fracture line, and usually concentrate on the weight bearing zone of the condyle. The Letenneur system is the most used classification method for this fracture pattern. Posterior-to-anterior fixation using isolated lag screws (for osteochondral fragments-Letenneur type 2) or associated with a posterior buttressing plate (when the fracture pattern is amenable for plate fixation-Letenneur types 1 and 3) is biomechanically more efficient than anterior-to-posterior fixation. Anterior-to-posterior fixation using lag screws complemented or not by a plate remains a widely used treatment option due to the surgeons' familiarity with the anterior approaches and lower risk of iatrogenic neurovascular injuries. There is no consensus in the literature regarding diameter and number of screws for fixation of coronal plane fractures of the distal femur.