Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
IJID Reg ; 11: 100379, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38855022

ABSTRACT

Objectives: We aimed to compare the clinical severity and outcome among laboratory-confirmed Omicron variant cases admitted between January and December 2022. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in Hasan Sadikin General Hospital between January and December 2022. We enrolled patients aged ≥18 years with laboratory-confirmed Omicron infection. Data were collected from clinical records and a whole genome sequencing database. We compared the risk of severe symptoms and mortality using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, comorbidities, and vaccination status. Results: We enrolled 255 patients and the main sub-lineages were BA.1 (16.1%), BA.2 (11.4%), BA.5 (35.7%), XBB (22.7%), and BQ.1 (14.1%). Compared with BA.1/BA.2, BA.5 sub-lineages were associated with severe symptoms (adjusted odds ratio of 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1-8.2, P <0.05). The highest risk of severe symptoms and mortality was linked with a high number of comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio of 7.8, 95% confidence interval 1.7-22.4, P <0.05). Booster vaccination was protective of severity and mortality. Conclusions: Disease severity was associated with BA.5 sub-lineages and multiple comorbidities. Good management is particularly important for people with comorbidities. Furthermore, booster vaccination is also required to reduce severity and mortality.

2.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(24)2023 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38132270

ABSTRACT

Quantitative determination of anti-SARS-CoV2-S-RBD is necessary for the evaluation of vaccination effectiveness. The surrogate viral neutralization test (SVNT) is approved for measuring anti-SARS-CoV2-S-RBD, but a point-of-care platform is needed to simplify anti-SARS-CoV-2-S-RBD measurement. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a rapid fluorescent immunoassay-based kit, FastBio-RBDTM, compared to the SVNT. During April-September 2021, we enrolled two groups of subjects, convalescent subjects and subjects without a COVID-19 history. The subjects were tested for the anti-SARS-CoV2-S-RBD antibody using FastBio-RBDTM and the GenScript-cPASSTM SVNT. We measured the correlation coefficient and conducted an ROC analysis to determine the best cut-off value of anti-SARS-CoV2-S-RBD against the SVNT percent inhibition levels of 30% and 60%. We included 109 subjects. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S-RBD strongly correlated to SVNT % inhibition with an R value of 0.866 (p < 0.0001). The ROC analysis showed that the anti-SARS-CoV-2-S-RBD of 6.71 AU/mL had 95.7% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity to detect a percentage inhibition of 30%. The anti-SARS-CoV-2-S-RBD of 59.76 AU/mL had a sensitivity of 88.1% and specificity of 97.0% to detect a percentage inhibition of 60%. FastBio-RBDTM could determine the presence and level of anti-SARS-CoV-2-S-RBD with good sensitivity and specificity. It has the potential to be deployed in health facilities with limited resources.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL