ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, the adoption of universal hearing screening in newborns has led to earlier detection of hearing problems and significant lowering of the age of first cochlear implantation. As a consequence, recipients are now expected to keep their cochlear implants (CIs) for a longer period of time. Comprehensive longitudinal information on CI reliability is essential for device choice. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability (in children and adults) of the latest generation of the Digisonic(®) SP CI launched in 2006 by Neurelec. Failure rate (FR) and cumulative survival rate (CSR) for a 5-year period were calculated. This survey is a multicenter retrospective study. A questionnaire was sent to nine CI centers requesting information about patients implanted with Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP CIs. FR and CSR over a 5-year period were calculated on this group. Collaborating centers collected data on 672 patients (362 children and 310 adults) implanted between March 2006 and March 2011. The overall rate of explantation was 2.23 % (15 cases): six devices were explanted due to device failure (0.89 %) and nine were explanted for medical reasons (1.34 %). Four patients were lost to follow-up. The CSR at 5 years was 98.51 % on all patients, 98.48 % for children and 98.57 % for adults. FR was 0.97 % for adults and 0.83 % for children. This first independent study that assesses FR and CSR on the current generation of Digisonic(®) SP CI represents an important resource that can help clinicians and patients during their device choice.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Prosthesis Design , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cochlear Implantation , Device Removal , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report speech performance in quiet and in noise, sound localization with cochlear implanted children bilaterally. Their performances were compared also in unilateral conditions. In addition, speech and language evaluation was analyzed. METHODS: Twenty-three children implanted with Neurelec Digisonic SP devices in 3 tertiary centres were tested on a battery of speech perception tests in quiet and in noise. Localization was assessed by lateralization tasks (90° and 30°). Progress in speech and language development and subjective assessment of benefit were assessed using several rating scales and questionnaires (categories of auditory perception, speech intelligibility rating, family participating rating scale). RESULTS: Children scored better when tested in bilateral conditions rather than in unilateral conditions. In quiet, the mean scores for the poorer and better side were 52% and 73%, respectively. In the bilateral condition, the mean score increased to 83%. In noise, the mean scores were 39% and 57% respectively, which increased to a mean of 70% in the bilateral condition. Nine children (<9 years) completed the ±90° lateralization task. For both unilateral conditions performance was not significantly different from chance level. In the bilateral condition, the mean score was 86%. The ±30° lateralization score was completed by eight of the older children (>9 years). The scores in the unilateral conditions were closed to chance level, but significantly better in the bilateral condition (mean of 86%). CONCLUSIONS: Performances in bilateral conditions were significantly better than in unilateral conditions on speech perception in quiet and in noise. Localization was significantly better when tested in the bilateral condition for ±90° lateralization task for the younger children and the ±30° task for the older children. All these results supported the hypothesis than bilateral cochlear implantation is more beneficial than unilateral implantation in children.
Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness/surgery , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/surgery , Noise , Sound Localization , Speech Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implantation , Deafness/diagnosis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/diagnosis , Hearing Tests/methods , Humans , Language Development , Male , Prosthesis Design , Risk Assessment , Speech Production Measurement , Speech Reception Threshold Test , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
CONCLUSION: Patients implanted with the Digisonic® SP device showed better identification scores than those implanted with the Convex device, with skills continuing to improve over a longer time period. Technological improvements were beneficial in terms of speech perception in quiet. OBJECTIVE: To compare speech perception skills for post-lingually deaf patients implanted with a previous Neurelec device, the Digisonic® Convex, with those implanted with a more recent one, the Digisonic® SP, which provides more electrodes and a faster stimulation rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 100 implanted patients, 45 with the Digisonic® Convex implant and 55 with the Digisonic® SP. Speech perception (dissyllabic words and sentences, in open set) was evaluated until 1 year after implantation. RESULTS: Patients fitted with the Digisonic® SP implant showed significantly better scores after 3, 6, and 12 months (mean scores: 53%, 62%, and 68% for words; 58%, 69%, and 75% for sentences) than those fitted with the Convex implant (34%, 42%, and 43% for words; 38%, 59%, and 51% for sentences). The improvement in speech perception after implantation for SP patients continued throughout the 12 months for words and 6 months for sentences, versus 6 months for words and 3 months for sentences for Convex patients.