High prevalence of ultrasound detected carotid atherosclerosis in subjects with low Framingham risk score: potential implications for screening for subclinical atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular (CV) risk assigned by the Framingham risk score (FRS) misses many subjects destined for CV events. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) as measured by computed tomography and carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and plaque assessment using B-mode ultrasound can identify subclinical atherosclerosis. The comparative relation of CAC and CIMT and carotid plaque after integration into the FRS is not established. The aim of this study was to develop a CV screening approach incorporating FRS, CAC, and CIMT. METHODS: The prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis, defined as CAC score > 0, CIMT > or = 75th percentile, or plaque > or = 1.5 mm, was determined in the groups with low, intermediate, and high FRS among 136 asymptomatic subjects. The CIMT and CAC values were used to determine "vascular age" and "coronary calcium" age, respectively, with established nomograms. RESULTS: In the 103 low-risk (FRS < 10%) subjects, 41%, 50%, 59%, and 66% had CAC scores > 0, CIMT > or = 75th percentile, plaque > or = 1.5 mm, and CIMT > or = 75th percentile or plaque > or = 1.5 mm, respectively. In the 33 subjects with intermediate (n = 14) or high (n = 19) FRS, 70%, 81%, 87%, and 87% had CAC scores > 0, CIMT > or = 75th percentile, plaque > or = 1.5 mm, and CIMT > or = 75th percentile or plaque > or = 1.5 mm, respectively. Fifty-two percent of subjects with coronary calcium scores of zero had carotid plaque. Adjusted for FRS, body mass index was an independent predictor of abnormal CIMT in the low-FRS group, but not of abnormal CAC. Mean vascular CIMT age was significantly higher than coronary calcium age (61.6 + or - 11.4 vs 58.3 + or - 11.1 years, P = .001), and both were significantly higher than chronologic age (56.9 + or - 10.1 years) (P < .0001 and P < .04, respectively). CIMT upgraded or downgraded FRS by >5% in more cases than CAC (42% vs 17%). CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients without CV disease, CIMT and plaque assessment are more likely to revise FRS than CAC. Body mass index predicts increased CIMT in low-FRS subjects. These findings may have broad implications for screening in low-FRS subjects.

Reproducibility of proximal isovelocity surface area, vena contracta, and regurgitant jet area for assessment of mitral regurgitation severity.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement of proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) and vena contracta (VC) for differentiating severe from nonsevere mitral regurgitation (MR). BACKGROUND: Recommendation for MR evaluation stresses the importance of VC width and effective regurgitant orifice area by PISA measurements. Reliable and accurate assessment of MR is important for clinical decision making regarding corrective surgery. We hypothesize that color Doppler-based quantitative measurements for classifying MR as severe versus nonsevere may be particularly susceptible to interobserver agreement. METHODS: The PISA and VC measurements of 16 patients with MR were interpreted by 18 echocardiologists from 11 academic institutions. In addition, we obtained quantitative assessment of MR based on color flow Doppler jet area. RESULTS: The overall interobserver agreement for grading MR as severe or nonsevere using qualitative and quantitative parameters was similar and suboptimal: 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1 to 0.52) for jet area-based MR grade, 0.28 (95% CI: 0.11 to 0.45) for VC measurements, and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.58) for PISA measurements. Significant univariate predictors of substantial interobserver agreement for: 1) jet area-based MR grade was functional etiology (p = 0.039); 2) VC was central MR (p = 0.013) and identifiable effective regurgitant orifice (p = 0.049); and 3) PISA was presence of a central MR jet (p = 0.003), fixed proximal flow convergence (p = 0.025), and functional etiology (p = 0.049). Significant multivariate predictors of raw interobserver agreement > or =80% included: 1) for VC, identifiable effective regurgitant orifice (p = 0.035); and 2) for PISA, central regurgitant jet (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The VC and PISA measurements for distinction of severe versus nonsevere MR are only modestly reliable and associated with suboptimal interobserver agreement. The presence of an identifiable effective regurgitant orifice improves reproducibility of VC and a central regurgitant jet predicts substantial agreement among multiple observers of PISA assessment.

Comparison of usefulness of left ventricular diastolic versus systolic function as a predictor of outcome following primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is an important predictor of morbidity and mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the role of diastolic function in predicting in-hospital events and LV ejection fraction (EF) 6 months after a first AMI that was treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prospectively enrolled 59 consecutive patients who were 60 +/- 15 years of age (48 men), presented at our institution with their first AMI, and were treated with primary PCI. Patients underwent 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography, including tissue Doppler imaging of 6 basal mitral annular regions within 24 hours after primary PCI and were followed until discharge. Clinical and echocardiographic variables at index AMI were compared with a combined end point of cardiac death, ventricular tachycardia, congestive heart failure, or emergency in-hospital surgical revascularization. Follow-up echocardiographic assessment was performed at 6 months in 24 patients. During hospitalization, 3 patients died, 7 developed congestive heart failure, 4 had ventricular tachycardia, and 1 required emergency surgical revascularization. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed the ratio of early mitral inflow diastolic filling wave (E) to peak early diastolic velocity of non-infarct-related mitral annulus (p < 0.01) (E') and mitral inflow E-wave deceleration time (p < 0.02) to be independent predictors of in-hospital cardiac events (generalized R2 = 0.66). In a stepwise multiple linear regression model, independent predictors of follow-up LVEF were mitral inflow deceleration time (R2 = 0.39, p = 0.002), baseline LVEF (R2 = 0.54, p < 0.02), and mitral inflow peak early velocity/mitral annular peak early velocity (or E/E') of infarct annulus (R2 = 0.66, p = 0.02). In conclusion, in patients who are treated with primary PCI for a first AMI, E/E' velocity ratio and mitral inflow E-wave deceleration time are strong predictors of in-hospital cardiac events and of LVEF at 6-month follow-up.