Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 193(1): 161-173, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35239071

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) helps increase breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), there is a growing concern for overtreatment. By estimating the expected BCSS of AST using PREDICT, this study aims to quantify the number of patients treated with AST without benefit to provide estimates of overtreatment. METHODS: Data of all non-metastatic unilateral breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2015 were retrieved from cancer registries from The Netherlands and the USA. The PREDICT tool was used to estimate AST survival benefit. Overtreatment was defined as the proportion of patients that would have survived regardless of or died despite AST within 10 years. Three scenarios were evaluated: actual treatment, and recommendations by the Dutch or USA guidelines. RESULTS: 59.5% of Dutch patients were treated with AST. 6.4% (interquartile interval [IQI] = 2.5, 8.2%) was expected to survive at least 10 years due to AST, leaving 93.6% (IQI = 91.8, 97.5%) without AST benefit (overtreatment). The lowest expected amount of overtreatment was in the targeted and chemotherapy subgroup, with 86.5% (IQI = 83.4, 89.6%) overtreatment, and highest in the only endocrine treatment subgroup, with 96.7% (IQI = 96.0, 98.1%) overtreatment. Similar results were obtained using data from the USA, and guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION: Based on PREDICT, AST prevents 10-year breast cancer death in 6.4% of the patients treated with AST. Consequently, AST yields no survival benefit to many treated patients. Especially improved personalization of endocrine therapy is relevant, as this therapy is widely used and is associated with the highest amount of overtreatment.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Overtreatment
2.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 41(2): 323-329, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29086057

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm on image quality in patients after complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with fenestrated and branched devices. METHODS: Routine follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations were performed between February 2016 and May 2017 in 18 patients who underwent a complex EVAR procedure at our institution. Objective analysis was performed by measuring the standard deviation (SD) of attenuation (Hounsfield Units), and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in regions of interests in the stented visceral arteries. Subjective analysis of the degree of artifacts and stent visualization was performed independently by two interventional radiologists, blinded to the image reconstruction. RESULTS: The SD of attenuation was significantly lower in all target visceral arteries (p < .001), the celiac artery (p = .002), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; p = .043), and renal arteries (p < .001) in the CT images with SEMAR reconstruction. The CNR significantly increased in all SEMAR-reconstructed target visceral arteries (overall: p < .001, celiac artery: p = .009; SMA: p = .003; renal arteries: p < .001). The reviewers rated a significantly lower artifact degree in all target vessels (overall: p < .001, celiac artery: p = .001; SMA: p = .008; renal arteries: p < .001) and a significantly improved visualization of the stent patency in all target vessels (overall: p < .001, celiac artery: p = .031; SMA: p = .047; renal arteries: p < .001) in the SEMAR images. Overall preference of both reviewers was in favor of the SEMAR reconstruction in 15/18 cases (83%). CONCLUSION: Reconstruction with SEMAR algorithm significantly improves CTA image quality in patients after complex EVAR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Case series.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Artifacts , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aorta, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Metals , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...