ABSTRACT
PROBLEM: The earthquake that struck Haiti in January 2010 caused 1.5 million people to be displaced to temporary camps. The Haitian Ministry of Public Health and Population and global immunization partners developed a plan to deliver vaccines to those residing in these camps. A strategy was needed to determine whether the immunization targets set for the campaign were achieved. APPROACH: Following the vaccination campaign, staff from the Ministry of Public Health and Population interviewed convenience samples of households - in specific predetermined locations in each of the camps - regarding receipt of the emergency vaccinations. A camp was targeted for "mop-up vaccination" - i.e. repeat mass vaccination - if more than 25% of the children aged 9 months to 7 years in the sample were found not to have received the emergency vaccinations. LOCAL SETTING: Rapid monitoring was implemented in camps located in the Port-au-Prince metropolitan area. Camps that housed more than 5000 people were monitored first. RELEVANT CHANGES: By the end of March 2010, 72 (23%) of the 310 vaccinated camps had been monitored. Although 32 (44%) of the monitored camps were targeted for mop-up vaccination, only six of them had received such repeat mass vaccination when checked several weeks after monitoring. LESSONS LEARNT: Rapid monitoring was only marginally beneficial in achieving immunization targets in the temporary camps in Port-au-Prince. More research is needed to evaluate the utility of conventional rapid monitoring, as well as other strategies, during post-disaster vaccination campaigns that involve mobile populations, particularly when there is little capacity to conduct repeat mass vaccination.
Subject(s)
Disasters , Earthquakes , Immunization Programs/organization & administration , Relief Work/organization & administration , Haiti , Health Services Research , Humans , Immunization Programs/standards , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Relief Work/standards , Relief Work/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In March, 2006, oral rotavirus vaccine was added to Brazil's infant immunization schedule with recommended upper age limits for initiating (by age 14 weeks) and completing (by age 24 weeks) the two-dose series to minimize age-specific risk of intussusception following rotavirus vaccination. Several years after introduction, estimated coverage with rotavirus vaccine (83%) was lower compared to coverage for other recommended childhood immunizations (≥94%). METHODS: We analyzed data from Brazil's national immunization program on uptake of oral rotavirus vaccine by geographic region and compared administrative coverage estimates for first and second doses of oral rotavirus vaccine (Rota1 and Rota2) with first and second doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (DTP-Hib1 and DTP-Hib2). For 27 Brazilian cities, we compared differences between estimated rotavirus and DTP-Hib coverage in 2010 with delayed receipt of DTP-Hib vaccine among a cohort of children surveyed before rotavirus introduction. RESULTS: In 2010, infant vaccination coverage was 99.0% for DTP-Hib1 versus 95.2% for Rota1 (3.8% difference), and 98.4% for DTP-Hib2 versus 83.0% for Rota2 (15.4% difference), with substantial regional variation. Differences between DTP-Hib and rotavirus vaccination coverage in Brazilian cities correlated with delay in DTP-Hib vaccination among children surveyed. Age restrictions for initiating and completing the rotavirus vaccination series likely contributed to lower coverage with rotavirus vaccine in Brazil. CONCLUSION: To maximize benefits of rotavirus vaccination, strategies are needed to improve timeliness of routine immunizations; monitoring rotavirus vaccine uptake and intussusception risk is needed to guide further recommendations for rotavirus vaccination.
Subject(s)
Immunization Programs , Immunization Schedule , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Child, Preschool , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Haemophilus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Haemophilus influenzae , Humans , Infant , Male , Membrane Glycoproteins , RotavirusABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Since 1977, vaccinations to protect against tuberculosis, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, and measles (and rubella since 2009) have been offered to children in Haiti through the routine immunization program. From April to July 2009, a national vaccination coverage survey was conducted to assess the success of the routine immunization program at reaching children in Haiti. METHODS: A multi-stage cluster survey was conducted using a modified WHO method for household sampling. A standardized questionnaire was administered to collect vaccination histories, demographic information, and reasons for under-vaccination of children aged 12-23 months. A child who received the eight recommended routine vaccinations was considered fully vaccinated. The routine vaccination schedule was used to define valid doses and estimate the percentage of children vaccinated on time. RESULTS: Among 1345 children surveyed, 40.4% (95% CI: 36.6-44.2) of the 840 children with vaccination cards had received all eight recommended vaccinations. Coverage was highest for the Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine (87.3%), the first doses of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (92.0%), and oral poliovirus vaccine (93.4%) and lowest for measles vaccine (46.9%). Timely vaccination rates were lower. Assuming similar coverage for the 505 children without cards, coverage with the complete vaccination series among all surveyed children 31.9%. Reasons for under-vaccination included not having enough time to reach the vaccination location (24.8%), having a child who was ill (13.8%), and not knowing when, or forgetting, to go for vaccination (12.8%). CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Coverage for early-infant vaccines was high; however, most children did not complete the full vaccination series, and many children received vaccinations later than recommended. Efforts to improve the immunization program should include increasing the frequency of outreach services, training for vaccination staff to minimize missed opportunities, and better communicating the timing of vaccinations to encourage caregivers to bring their children for vaccinations at the recommended age. Efforts to promote the benefits of vaccination and card retention are also needed.
Subject(s)
Health Care Surveys , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Female , Haiti , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Infant , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccines/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A national campaign was conducted in Haiti in 2007-2008 to vaccinate all children and adolescents aged 1-19 years with measles-rubella vaccine in support of achieving the Region of the Americas' 2010 goal of eliminating rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). Measles-rubella vaccine was introduced into the country's routine childhood immunization schedule after the campaign. METHODS: A nationwide, stratified, multistage cluster sample survey of 20859 children was conducted to assess coverage using house-to-house interviews. RESULTS: Estimated national coverage with measles-rubella vaccine was 79.2% (95% confidence interval, 77.6%-80.7%), ranging from 90.2% in Nord-Ouest Department to 70.0% in Cite Soleil Metropolitan Area. National coverage was lower for children aged 1-5 years (76.7%) than for those aged 6-19 years (80.3%) (P< .001) but similar in rural departments (79.4%) and metropolitan areas (78.6%; P = .61). The reasons most frequently cited for nonparticipation in the campaign were that the child was ill or unavailable (18.6%), did not know vaccinations were important (13.8%), did not know when to go or forgot to go (13.3%), and did not have enough time (12.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The measles-rubella vaccination campaign was critical for raising rubella immunity levels in children and adolescents in Haiti. To remain free of rubella transmission and CRS, Haiti must also achieve and sustain high routine measles-rubella vaccination coverage and maintain high-quality integrated measles-rubella and CRS surveillance, including laboratory-based confirmation for reported rash illnesses. If routine measles-rubella vaccination coverage is suboptimal or if gaps in coverage are identified, additional mass campaigns with measles-rubella vaccine will be necessary.
Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Haiti/epidemiology , Health Policy , Humans , Infant , Measles Vaccine/immunology , Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Region of the Americas eliminated measles in 2002 through high first-dose routine measles vaccine coverage and vaccination campaigns every 4-6 years; a second routine dose at school entry was added in some countries. The impact of this second routine dose on measles elimination was evaluated. METHODS: Data on socioeconomic factors, demographic characteristics, vaccination coverage, and the estimated proportion of children (<15 years of age) susceptible to measles were compiled. Countries were grouped using propensity score methods, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare time to measles elimination between countries with a 1-dose schedule and those with a 2-dose schedule. RESULTS: One-dose (n = 14) and 2-dose (n = 7) countries did not differ with respect to median routine first-dose measles vaccine coverage, median coverage for 3 measles campaigns, or estimated percentage of susceptible children after routine first vaccination dose and campaigns. Compared with 1-dose countries, 2-dose countries had higher median gross national income per capita (P = .002), percentage of population living in urban areas (P = .04), and female literacy (P = .01), as well as lower infant mortality (P = .007); however, no differences in time to elimination were found. CONCLUSIONS: One-dose and 2-dose countries had similar times to measles elimination despite socioeconomic differences between their populations. A second routine dose might not have hastened measles elimination, because threshold immunity needed to eliminate measles was achieved with high first routine dose coverage and vaccination campaigns. Further research will be needed to determine the applicability of these findings to other regions.