An outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in a public-facing office in England.

BACKGROUND: An outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with an attack rate of 55% (22/40 workers) occurred at a public-facing office in England from August to September 2021. Published evidence regarding outbreaks in office workplaces remains limited. AIMS: To describe an investigation of workplace- and worker-related risk factors following an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in a public-facing office. METHODS: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) Outbreak Investigation to Understand Transmission (COVID-OUT) study undertook an investigation of the outbreak. This included surface sampling, occupational environmental assessment, molecular and serological testing of workers, and detailed questionnaires. RESULTS: Despite existing COVID-19 control measures, surface sampling conducted during a self-imposed 2-week temporary office closure identified viral contamination (10/60 samples, 17% positive), particularly in a small, shared security office (6/9, 67% positive) and on a window handle in one open-plan office. Targeted enhanced cleaning was, therefore, undertaken before the office reopened. Repeat surface sampling after this identified only one positive (2%) sample. Ventilation was deemed adequate using carbon dioxide monitoring (typically ≤1000 ppm). Twelve workers (30%) responded to the COVID-OUT questionnaire, and all had been vaccinated with two doses. One-third of respondents (4/12) reported direct physical or close contact with members of the public; of these, 75% (3/4) reported a divider/screen between themselves and members of the public. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the potential utility of surface sampling to identify SARS-CoV-2 control deficiencies and the importance of evolving, site-specific risk assessments with layered COVID-19 mitigation strategies.

In situ cranioplasty with methylmethacrylate and wire lattice.

Most techniques of cranioplasty are expensive and require advance preparation if a custom-moulded prosthesis is to be used. Technical problems with cranioplasties using synthetic materials include sinking, elevation and rotation, while those with hydroxyapatite or bone graft cranioplasties include resorption and harvest site disfigurement. We report our technique of in situ cranioplasty using methylmethacrylate and a wire lattice that is fast, inexpensive and avoids these technical problems.

Primary diffuse leptomeningeal gliomatosis.

Primary diffuse leptomeningeal gliomatosis is a rare central nervous system neoplasm in which focal or diffuse evidence of gliomatous tissue is identified in the subarachnoid space with no evidence of a primary tumour. A case is presented and the differential diagnosis and management are discussed.

Preliminary experience with anterior cervical microdiscectomy and interbody titanium cage fusion (Novus CT-Ti) in patients with cervical disc disease.

BACKGROUND: Although the use of intervertebral fusion after anterior microdiscectomy in cervical disc disease remains controversial, a new surgical device is proposed for use in intervertebral fusion instead of bone graft. METHODS: This retrospective study at the Department of Neurosurgery, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, from January 1993 to December 1998, compares the results of surgery on 58 patients with anterior microdiscectomy and intervertebral bone graft fusion (Group A) (ADIBG) with a group of 52 patients who underwent anterior microdiscectomy and intervertebral titanium cage fusion (Group B) (ADITC) in cervical radiculopathy and spondylotic myelopathy. In both groups a "radical discectomy" was performed under the operating microscope. In group A, interbody fusion was performed with autologous tricortical bone graft. In group B, a new type of titanium device (Novus CT-Ti) was used (Sofamor Danek Group). RESULTS: There was no collapse or extrusion of the device and no complications at the donor site (the bone fragments used to fill the cage were taken from osteophytes or vertebral body fragments). The use of this device provides immediate stabilization, reduces or eliminates pain, promotes bone fusion between the vertebrae adjacent to the cage by allowing bone growth through the cage, reestablishes and maintains the intervertebral space, reduces the average hospitalization time, and allows a quicker return to work. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent ADITC did well and benefited from the surgery. Those who underwent ADITC did better than those who underwent ADIBG in regard to function, relief from pain, and complications. Early and good stability of the cervical spine seems to be the main advantage of using titanium cages.