Signet ring cells and conditional survival after trimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Although signet ring cell (SRC) histology is associated with resistance to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and worse overall survival (OS) in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), its prognostic relationship among patients who survive the early period following resection is unknown. EAC patients who underwent trimodality therapy at a single institution (2006-2018) were identified. Bayesian multivariable regression (BMR) analyses of OS and additional OS from a 3-year landmark were performed. RESULTS: Of 631 patients, SRCs were present in 16.0% (N = 101). SRC was associated with shorter median OS (45.8 [95% confidence interval: 31.0-96.7] vs. 79.8 [63.0-107.2] months; p = 0.014). In BMR analysis, the absence of an SRC component was moderately associated with improved OS (probability of beneficial effect, PBE = 0.879). Three-year conditional BMR analysis of additional OS (N = 357) showed that SRC status no longer had a prognostic effect (PBE = 0.546); higher pathological stage was strongly associated with worse additional OS (PBE < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of SRC portends worse OS following trimodality therapy for EAC. However, this prognostic impact is dynamic and abates by 3 years postoperatively. In contrast, a higher pathological stage is strongly associated with poor overall and 3-year conditional survival. DISCUSSION: These findings may inform postoperative patient counseling and surveillance protocols.

Pulmonary Surgical Margins for Metastatic Osteosarcoma: Is Negative Margin Enough?

BACKGROUND: In advanced osteosarcoma, the lung is the most frequent site of distant metastasis, with metastasectomy often used for local disease control. The influence of pulmonary resection margin length on outcomes for osteosarcoma has not been well explored. This study sought to evaluate the impact of margin length relative to tumor size on local recurrence and survival in lung-limited metastatic osteosarcoma. METHODS: Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma who underwent lung resection between 2000 and 2020 were identified from a single institution. Clinicopathologic variables were collected. The margin length-to-tumor size ratio (MTR) was calculated per nodule and classified relative to an MTR of 0.5. The primary outcome was development of local recurrence per nodule. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate covariates. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients with 689 nodules met inclusion criteria, with mean age of 35.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 20.9-46.6 years). Patients were predominantly male (n = 87; 61.3%) and White (n = 106; 72.5%). Most nodules (n = 644; 93.5%) were resected through thoracotomy. The mean tumor size was 0.8 cm (IQR, 0.5-1.70 cm), with an average margin length of 0.3 cm (IQR, 0.1-0.7 cm). Among all nodules, 299 (43.4%) had an MTR >0.5. Systemic therapy was received by 94 patients (66.2%) preoperatively and by 100 patients (70.4%) postoperatively. Importantly, the study found that an MTR >0.5 conferred a protective effect against disease recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In resected pulmonary metastatic osteosarcoma, a margin length greater than one-half the size of the pulmonary nodule is associated with a lower incidence of local disease recurrence. This finding has implications for the subsequent need for additional therapy and disease-free status, thus meriting attentive intraoperative consideration.

Patient-reported outcome measures in surgical patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers: A qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with pancreatic and gastroesophageal (PGE) cancers experience high symptom burden, but patient experience throughout multimodality treatment remains unclear. We aimed to delineate the experience and symptom burden of patients throughout their perioperative course. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were performed with 17 surgical patients with PGE cancer. Interview transcripts were analyzed and symptoms were ranked by frequency. An expert panel assessed the relevance of these symptom inventory items. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients included, 35% (n = 6) underwent gastrectomy, 30% (n = 5) underwent esophagectomy, and 35% (n = 6) underwent pancreatectomy; 76% (n = 13) received neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation. Overall, 32 symptoms were reported, and 19 were reported by over 20% of patients. An expert panel rated nine symptoms to be relevant or very relevant to PGE surgical patients. These symptoms (difficulty swallowing, heartburn/reflux, diarrhea, constipation, flushing/sweating, stomach feeling full, malaise, dizziness, or feeling cold) were added to the core MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) if they were commonly reported or reached a threshold relevancy score. CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative study, we developed a provisional symptom inventory for patients undergoing surgery for PGE cancer. This symptom inventory module of the MDASI for PGE surgical patients will be psychometrically tested for validity and reliability.

Improving care in lung cancer surgery: a review of quality measures and evolving standards.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Pulmonary resection, in addition to perioperative systemic therapies, is a cornerstone of treatment for operable patients with early-stage and locoregional disease. In recent years, increased emphasis has been placed on surgical quality metrics: specific and evidence-based structural, process, and outcome measures that aim to decrease variation in lung cancer care and improve long term outcomes. These metrics can be divided into potential areas of intervention or improvement in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of care and form the basis of guidelines issued by organizations including the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). This review focuses on established quality metrics associated with lung cancer surgery with an emphasis on the most recent research and guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Over the past 18 months, quality metrics across the peri-operative care period were explored, including optimal invasive mediastinal staging preoperatively, the extent of intraoperative lymphadenectomy, surgical approaches related to minimally invasive resection, and enhanced recovery pathways that facilitate early discharge following pulmonary resection. SUMMARY: Quality metrics in lung cancer surgery is an exciting and important area of research. Adherence to quality metrics has been shown to improve overall survival and guidelines supporting their use allows targeted quality improvement efforts at a local level to facilitate more consistent, less variable oncologic outcomes across centers.

Early Interventional Treatment of High Output Chyle Leak After Esophagectomy is Associated With Improved Survival.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate overall survival and length of stay (LOS) associated with differing management for high output (>1 L over 24 hours) leaks (HOCL) after cancer-related esophagectomy. BACKGROUND: Although infrequent, chyle leak after esophagectomy is an event that can lead to significant perioperative sequelae. Low-volume leaks appear to respond to nonoperative measures, whereas HOCLs often require invasive therapeutic interventions. METHODS: From a prospective single-institution database, we retrospectively reviewed patients treated from 2001 to 2021 who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Within that cohort, we focused on a subgroup of patients who manifested a HOCL postoperatively. Clinicopathologic and operative characteristics were collected, including hospital LOS and survival data. RESULTS: A total of 53/2299 patients manifested a HOCL. These were mostly males (77%), with a mean age of 62 years. Of this group, 15 patients received nonoperative management, 15 patients received prompt (<72 hours from diagnosis) interventional management, and 23 received late interventional management. Patients in the late intervention group had longer LOSs compared with early intervention (slope = 9.849, 95% CI: 3.431-16.267). Late intervention (hazard ratio: 4.772, CI: 1.384-16.460) and nonoperative management (hazard ratio: 4.731, CI: 1.294-17.305) were associated with increased mortality compared with early intervention. Patients with early intervention for HOCL had an overall survival similar to patients without chyle leaks in survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HOCL should receive early intervention to possibly reverse the prognostic implications of this potentially detrimental complication.

Octreotide's role in the management of post-esophagectomy chylothorax.

The use of octreotide in managing intrathoracic chyle leak following esophagectomy has gained popularity in the adult population. While the benefits of octreotide have been confirmed in the pediatric population, there remains limited evidence to support its use in the adults post-esophagectomy. Thus, we performed a single-institution cohort study to characterize its efficacy. The study was performed using a prospective, single-center database, from which clinicopathologic characteristics were extracted of patients who had post-esophagectomy chyle leaks. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of octreotide use on chest tube duration (CTD), hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall survival (OS). In our cohort, 74 patients met inclusion criteria, among whom 27 (36.5%) received octreotide. Kaplan-Meier revealed no significant effect of octreotide on CTD (P = 0.890), LOS (P = 0.740), or OS (P = 0.570). Multivariable Cox regression analyses further corroborated that octreotide had no effect on CTD (HR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-1.20, P = 0.155), LOS (HR = 0.64, CI: 0.34-1.21, P = 0.168), or OS (1.08, CI: 0.53-2.19, P = 0.833). Octreotide use in adult patients with chyle leak following esophagectomy lacks evidence of association with meaningful clinical outcomes. Level 1 evidence is needed prior to further consideration in this population.

Disparities in early-stage lung cancer outcomes at minority-serving hospitals compared with nonminority serving hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: Disparities in cancer care are omnipresent and originate from a multilevel set of barriers. Our objectives were to describe the likelihood of undergoing surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer at minority-serving hospitals (MSHs), and evaluate the association of race/ethnicity with resection based on MSH status. METHODS: A retrospective study using the National Cancer Database (2008-2016) was conducted including patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. MSHs were defined as hospitals in the top decile of providing care to Hispanic or African American patients. The primary outcome evaluated was receipt of definitive surgery at MSHs vs non-MSHs. Outcomes related to race/ethnicity stratified by hospital type were also investigated. RESULTS: A total of 142,580 patients were identified from 1192 hospitals (120 MSHs and 1072 non-MSHs). Most patients (85% [n = 121,240]) were non-Hispanic White, followed by African American (9% [n = 12,772]), and Hispanic (3%, [n= 3749]). MSHs cared for 7.4% (n = 10,491) of the patients included. In adjusted analyses, patients treated at MSHs were resected less often than those at non-MSHs (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00; P = .0495). African American patients were less likely to receive surgery in the overall analysis (P < .01), and at MSHs specifically (P < .01), compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Hispanic patients had similar rates of resection in the overall analysis (P = .11); however, at MSHs, they underwent surgery more often compared with non-Hispanic White patients (P = .02). Resected patients at MSHs had similar overall survival (median, 91.7 months; 95% CI, 86.6-96.8 months) compared with those resected at non-MSHs (median, 85.7 months; 95% CI, 84.5-86.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer underwent resection less often at MSHs compared with non-MSHs. Disparities related to underutilization of surgery for African American patients continue to persist, regardless of hospital type.