Cardiac Computed Tomography of Native Cardiac Valves.

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a significant clinical problem associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although not being the primary imaging modality in VHD, cardiac computed tomography (CCT) provides relevant information about its morphology, function, severity grading, and adverse cardiac remodeling assessment. Aortic valve calcification quantification is necessary for grading severity in cases of low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis. Moreover, CCT details significant information necessary for adequate percutaneous treatment planning. CCT may help to detail the etiology of VHD as well as to depict other less frequent causes of valvular disease, such as infective endocarditis, valvular neoplasms, or other cardiac pseudomasses.

Photon-counting CT in Thoracic Imaging: Early Clinical Evidence and Incorporation Into Clinical Practice.

Photon-counting CT (PCCT) is an emerging advanced CT technology that differs from conventional CT in its ability to directly convert incident x-ray photon energies into electrical signals. The detector design also permits substantial improvements in spatial resolution and radiation dose efficiency and allows for concurrent high-pitch and high-temporal-resolution multienergy imaging. This review summarizes (a) key differences in PCCT image acquisition and image reconstruction compared with conventional CT; (b) early evidence for the clinical benefit of PCCT for high-spatial-resolution diagnostic tasks in thoracic imaging, such as assessment of airway and parenchymal diseases, as well as benefits of high-pitch and multienergy scanning; (c) anticipated radiation dose reduction, depending on the diagnostic task, and increased utility for routine low-dose thoracic CT imaging; (d) adaptations for thoracic imaging in children; (e) potential for further quantitation of thoracic diseases; and (f) limitations and trade-offs. Moreover, important points for conducting and interpreting clinical studies examining the benefit of PCCT relative to conventional CT and integration of PCCT systems into multivendor, multispecialty radiology practices are discussed.

Predicting postoperative systolic dysfunction in mitral regurgitation: CT vs. echocardiography.

Introduction: Volume overload from mitral regurgitation can result in left ventricular systolic dysfunction. To prevent this, it is essential to operate before irreversible dysfunction occurs, but the optimal timing of intervention remains unclear. Current echocardiographic guidelines are based on 2D linear measurement thresholds only. We compared volumetric CT-based and 2D echocardiographic indices of LV size and function as predictors of post-operative systolic dysfunction following mitral repair. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with primary mitral valve regurgitation who underwent repair between 2005 and 2021. Several indices of LV size and function measured on preoperative cardiac CT were compared with 2D echocardiography in predicting post-operative LV systolic dysfunction (LVEFecho <50%). Area under the curve (AUC) was the primary metric of predictive performance. Results: A total of 243 patients were included (mean age 57 ± 12 years; 65 females). The most effective CT-based predictors of post-operative LV systolic dysfunction were ejection fraction [LVEFCT; AUC 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92)] and LV end systolic volume indexed to body surface area [LVESViCT; AUC 0.88 (0.82-0.95)]. The best echocardiographic predictors were LVEFecho [AUC 0.70 (0.58-0.82)] and LVESDecho [AUC 0.79 (0.70-0.89)]. LVEFCT was a significantly better predictor of post-operative LV systolic dysfunction than LVEFecho (p = 0.02) and LVESViCT was a significantly better predictor than LVESDecho (p = 0.03). Ejection fraction measured by CT demonstrated significantly greater reproducibility than echocardiography. Discussion: CT-based volumetric measurements may be superior to established 2D echocardiographic parameters for predicting LV systolic dysfunction following mitral valve repair. Validation with prospective study is warranted.

Multimodality Imaging in Metabolic Syndrome: State-of-the-Art Review.

Metabolic syndrome comprises a set of risk factors that include abdominal obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein levels, and high blood pressure, at least three of which must be fulfilled for diagnosis. Metabolic syndrome has been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Multimodality imaging plays an important role in metabolic syndrome, including diagnosis, risk stratification, and assessment of complications. CT and MRI are the primary tools for quantification of excess fat, including subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, as well as fat around organs, which are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. PET has been shown to detect signs of insulin resistance and may detect ectopic sites of brown fat. Cardiovascular disease is an important complication of metabolic syndrome, resulting in subclinical or symptomatic coronary artery disease, alterations in cardiac structure and function with potential progression to heart failure, and systemic vascular disease. CT angiography provides comprehensive evaluation of the coronary and systemic arteries, while cardiac MRI assesses cardiac structure, function, myocardial ischemia, and infarction. Liver damage results from a spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease ranging from steatosis to fibrosis and possible cirrhosis. US, CT, and MRI are useful in assessing steatosis and can be performed to detect and grade hepatic fibrosis, particularly using elastography techniques. Metabolic syndrome also has deleterious effects on the pancreas, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and ovaries, including increased risk for several malignancies. Metabolic syndrome is associated with cerebral infarcts, best evaluated with MRI, and has been linked with cognitive decline. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Pickhardt in this issue.

Multimodality Imaging of Infective Endocarditis.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a complex multisystemic disease resulting from infection of the endocardium, the prosthetic valves, or an implantable cardiac electronic device. The clinical presentation of patients with IE varies, ranging from acute and rapidly progressive symptoms to a more chronic disease onset. Because of its severe morbidity and mortality rates, it is necessary for radiologists to maintain a high degree of suspicion in evaluation of patients for IE. Modified Duke criteria are used to classify cases as "definite IE," "possible IE," or "rejected IE." However, these criteria are limited in characterizing definite IE in clinical practice. The use of advanced imaging techniques such as cardiac CT and nuclear imaging has increased the accuracy of these criteria and has allowed possible IE to be reclassified as definite IE in up to 90% of cases. Cardiac CT may be the best choice when there is high clinical suspicion for IE that has not been confirmed with other imaging techniques, in cases of IE and perivalvular involvement, and for preoperative treatment planning or excluding concomitant coronary artery disease. Nuclear imaging may have a complementary role in prosthetic IE. The main imaging findings in IE are classified according to the site of involvement as valvular (eg, abnormal growths [ie, "vegetations"], leaflet perforations, or pseudoaneurysms), perivalvular (eg, pseudoaneurysms, abscesses, fistulas, or prosthetic dehiscence), or extracardiac embolic phenomena. The differential diagnosis of IE includes evaluation for thrombus, pannus, nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, Lambl excrescences, papillary fibroelastoma, and caseous necrosis of the mitral valve. The location of the lesion relative to the surface of the valve, the presence of a stalk, and calcification or enhancement at contrast-enhanced imaging may offer useful clues for their differentiation. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

The Radiology Journal Club: An Update on Best Practices and Lessons Learned From Other Specialties.

The discussion and critical appraisal of medical literature in a group setting has been incorporated in health care education for over a century and remains one of the structured didactic activities in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education radiology residency educational requirements. The panel members of the "Radiology Journal Club: Best Practice from Across the Country" Task Force of the Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance have collated best practices from radiology and other medical specialties to help radiology departments to establish or resume journal club as part of their residency or fellowship educational program. Key components include a leadership team to designate mentors, facilitators, and ad hoc content experts; to establish the scope, goals and learning objectives; to identify the target audience and level of faculty and trainee involvement; and establish appropriate meeting frequency. Providing relevant and easily accessible resources, mentoring and other preparatory materials can build trainee skill in critical appraisal of the medical literature, foster innovation, and advance radiological knowledge in this ever-evolving discipline.

Motion artifact correction in cardiac CT using cross-phase temporospatial information and synergistic attention gate and spatial transformer sub-networks.

Objectives.To improve quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images using a generalizable motion-correction algorithm.Approach. A neural network with attention gate and spatial transformer (ATOM) was developed to correct coronary motion. Phantom and patient CCTA images (39 males, 32 females, age range 19-92, scan date 02/2020 to 10/2021) retrospectively collected from dual-source CT were used to create training, development, and testing sets corresponding to 140- and 75 ms temporal resolution, with 75 ms images as labels. To test generalizability, ATOM was deployed for locally adaptive motion-correction in both 140- and 75 ms patient images. Objective metrics were used to assess motion-corrupted and corrected phantom and patient images, including structural-similarity-index (SSIM), dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), peak-signal-noise-ratio (PSNR), and normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE). In objective quality assessment, ATOM was compared with several baseline networks, including U-net, U-net plus attention gate, U-net plus spatial transformer, VDSR, and ResNet. Two cardiac radiologists independently interpreted motion-corrupted and -corrected images at 75 and 140 ms in a blinded fashion and ranked diagnostic image quality (worst to best: 1-4, no ties).Main results. ATOM improved quality metrics (p< 0.05) before/after correction: in phantom, SSIM 0.87/0.95, DSC 0.85/0.93, PSNR 19.4/22.5, NRMSE 0.38/0.27; in patient images, SSIM 0.82/0.88, DSC 0.88/0.90, PSNR 30.0/32.0, NRMSE 0.16/0.12. ATOM provided more consistent improvement of objective image quality, compared to the presented baseline networks. The motion-corrected images received better ranks than un-corrected at the same temporal resolution (p< 0.05): 140 ms images 1.65/2.25, and 75 ms images 3.1/3.2. The motion-corrected 75 ms images received the best rank in 65% of testing cases. A fair-to-good inter-reader agreement was observed (Kappa score 0.58).Significance. ATOM reduces motion artifacts, improving visualization of coronary arteries. This algorithm can be used to virtually improve temporal resolution in both single- and dual-source CT.

The current and future role of imaging of thoracic aortic disease: a North American society for cardiovascular imaging commentary on the 2022 AHA/ACC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease.

The 2022 AHA/ACC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease introduced important updates for managing thoracic aorta aortic disease (TAD). In particular, the Guidelines underscore multimodality imaging's role in diagnosis, risk assessment, and monitoring of patients with TAD. This commentary aims to distill key imaging aspects from the Guidelines to provide a concise reference for the cardiovascular imaging community. Primary areas of focus include: (1) The importance of imagers in the multidisciplinary TAD care team, (2) Appropriate imaging techniques along with their strengths and weaknesses, (3) Aortic measurement methods and how aortic size and growth should contribute to TAD risk assessment, (4) Imaging evaluation of acute aortic syndrome. We have also highlighted several areas of ongoing uncertainty and confusion, specifically related to aortic measurement techniques and descriptive terminology. Finally, a perspective on the future of TAD imaging is discussed with a focus on advanced imaging tools and techniques as well as the potential role of artificial intelligence.

Coronary artery stenosis quantification in patients with dense calcifications using ultra-high-resolution photon-counting-detector computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: To quantify differences in coronary artery stenosis severity in patients with calcified lesions between conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT. METHODS: Patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary CT angiography were prospectively recruited and scanned first on an EID-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers) and then a PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers) on the same day. EID-CT was performed with standard mode (192 â€‹× â€‹0.6 â€‹mm detector collimation) following our clinical protocol. PCD-CT scans were performed under UHR mode (120 â€‹× â€‹0.2 â€‹mm detector collimation). For each patient, left main, left anterior descending, right coronary artery, and circumflex were reviewed and the most severe stenosis from dense calcification for each coronary was quantified using commercial software. Additionally, each measured stenosis was assigned a severity category based on percent diameter stenosis, and changes in severity category across EID-CT and PCD-CT were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were enrolled, with 34 coronary artery stenoses analyzed. Stenosis was significantly reduced in PCD-CT compared to EID-CT (p â€‹< â€‹0.001), resulting in an average of 11% (SD â€‹= â€‹11%) reduction in percent diameter stenosis. Among the 34 lesions, 15 changed in stenosis severity category: 3 went from moderate to minimal, 1 from moderate to mild, 9 from mild to minimal, and 2 from minimal to mild with the use of PCD-CT compared to EID-CT. CONCLUSION: Use of UHR PCD-CT decreased percent diameter stenosis by an average of 11% relative to EID-CT, resulting in 13 of 34 stenoses being downgraded in stenosis severity category, potentially sparing patients from unnecessary intervention.

Infrapopliteal Segments on Lower Extremity CTA: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Energy-Integrating Detector CT and Photon-Counting Detector CT.

BACKGROUND. The higher spatial resolution and image contrast for iodine-containing tissues of photon-counting detector (PCD) CT may address challenges in evaluating small calcified vessels when performing lower extremity CTA by energy-integrating detector (EID) CTA. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of the study was to compare the evaluation of infrapopliteal vasculature between lower extremity CTA performed using EID CT and PCD CT. METHODS. This prospective study included 32 patients (mean age, 69.7 ± 11.3 [SD] years; 27 men, five women) who underwent clinically indicated lower extremity EID CTA between April 2021 and March 2022; participants underwent investigational lower extremity PCD CTA later the same day as EID CTA using a reduced IV contrast media dose. Two radiologists independently reviewed examinations in two sessions, each containing a random combination of EID CTA and PCD CTA examinations; the readers assessed the number of visualized fibular perforators, characteristics of stenoses at 11 infrapopliteal segmental levels, and subjective arterial sharpness. RESULTS. Mean IV contrast media dose was 60.0 ± 11.0 (SD) mL for PCD CTA versus 139.6 ± 11.8 mL for EID CTA (p < .001). The number of identified fibular perforators per lower extremity was significantly higher for PCD CTA than for EID CTA for reader 1 (R1) (mean ± SD, 6.4 ± 3.2 vs 4.2 ± 2.4; p < .001) and reader 2 (R2) (8.8 ± 3.4 vs 7.6 ± 3.3; p = .04). Reader confidence for assessing stenosis was significantly higher for PCD CTA than for EID CTA for R1 (mean ± SD, 82.3 ± 20.3 vs 78.0 ± 20.2; p < .001) but not R2 (89.8 ± 16.7 vs 90.6 ± 7.1; p = .24). The number of segments per lower extremity with total occlusion was significantly lower for PCD CTA than for EID CTA for R2 (mean ± SD, 0.5 ± 1.3 vs 0.9 ± 1.7; p = .04) but not R1 (0.6 ± 1.3 vs 1.0 ± 1.5; p = .07). The number of segments per lower extremity with clinically significant nonocclusive stenosis was significantly higher for PCD CTA than for EID CTA for R1 (mean ± SD, 2.2 ± 2.2 vs 1.6 ± 1.7; p = .01) but not R2 (1.1 ± 2.0 vs 1.1 ± 1.4; p = .89). Arterial sharpness was significantly greater for PCD CTA than for EID CTA for R1 (mean ± SD, 3.2 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 0.5; p < .001) and R2 (3.2 ± 0.4 vs 1.7 ± 0.8; p < .001). CONCLUSION. PCD CTA yielded multiple advantages relative to EID CTA for visualizing small infrapopliteal vessels and characterizing associated plaque. CLINICAL IMPACT. The use of PCD CTA may improve vascular evaluation in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Congenital or Acquired Heart Disease.

Pediatric heart disease is a large and diverse field with an overall prevalence estimated at 6 to 13 per 1,000 live births. This document discusses appropriateness of advanced imaging for a broad range of variants. Diseases covered include tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of great arteries, congenital or acquired pediatric coronary artery abnormality, single ventricle, aortopathy, anomalous pulmonary venous return, aortopathy and aortic coarctation, with indications for advanced imaging spanning the entire natural history of the disease in children and adults, including initial diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment monitoring, and early detection of complications. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: 2023 Update.

This document discusses preprocedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, evaluating the imaging modalities used in initial imaging for preprocedure planning under two variants 1) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of aortic root; and 2) Preintervention planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. US echocardiography transesophageal, MRI heart function and morphology without and with IV contrast, MRI heart function and morphology without IV contrast and CT heart function and morphology with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of aortic root. CTA chest with IV contrast, CTA abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast, CTA chest abdomen pelvis with IV contrast are usually appropriate for assessment of supravalvular aorta and vascular access. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Comparison of Photon-counting Detector and Energy-integrating Detector CT for Visual Estimation of Coronary Percent Luminal Stenosis.

Background Compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, the improved resolution of photon-counting detector (PCD) CT coupled with high-energy virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) has been shown to decrease calcium blooming on images in phantoms and cadaveric specimens. Purpose To determine the impact of dual-source PCD CT on visual and quantitative estimation of percent diameter luminal stenosis compared with dual-source EID CT in patients. Materials and Methods This prospective study recruited consecutive adult patients from an outpatient facility between January and March 2022. Study participants underwent clinical dual-source EID coronary CT angiography followed by a research dual-source PCD CT examination. For PCD CT, multienergy data were used to create VMIs at 50 and 100 keV. Two readers independently reviewed EID CT images followed by PCD CT images after a washout period. Readers visually graded the most severe stenosis in terms of percent diameter luminal stenosis for the left main, left anterior descending, right, and circumflex coronary arteries, unblinded to scanner type. Quantitative measures of percent stenosis were made using commercial software. Visual and quantitative estimates of percent stenosis were compared between EID CT and PCD CT using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results A total of 25 participants (median age, 59 years [range, 18-78 years]; 16 male participants) were enrolled. On EID CT images, readers 1 and 2 identified 39 and 32 luminal stenoses, respectively, with a percent diameter luminal stenosis greater than 0%. Visual estimates of percent stenosis were lower on PCD CT images than EID CT images (reader 1: median 20.6% [IQR, 8.8%-61.2%] vs 31.8% [IQR, 12.9%-69.7%], P < .001; reader 2: 6.5% [IQR, 0.4%-54.1%] vs 22.9% [IQR, 1.8%-67.4%], P = .002). No difference was observed between EID CT and PCD CT for quantitative measures of percent stenosis (median difference, -1.5% [95% CI: -3.0%, 2.5%]; P = .51). Conclusion Relative to using EID CT, using PCD CT led to decreases in visual estimates of percent stenosis. © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Murphy and Donnelly in this issue.

Milestones in CT: Past, Present, and Future.

In 1971, the first patient CT examination by Ambrose and Hounsfield paved the way for not only volumetric imaging of the brain but of the entire body. From the initial 5-minute scan for a 180° rotation to today's 0.24-second scan for a 360° rotation, CT technology continues to reinvent itself. This article describes key historical milestones in CT technology from the earliest days of CT to the present, with a look toward the future of this essential imaging modality. After a review of the beginnings of CT and its early adoption, the technical steps taken to decrease scan times-both per image and per examination-are reviewed. Novel geometries such as electron-beam CT and dual-source CT have also been developed in the quest for ever-faster scans and better in-plane temporal resolution. The focus of the past 2 decades on radiation dose optimization and management led to changes in how exposure parameters such as tube current and tube potential are prescribed such that today, examinations are more customized to the specific patient and diagnostic task than ever before. In the mid-2000s, CT expanded its reach from gray-scale to color with the clinical introduction of dual-energy CT. Today's most recent technical innovation-photon-counting CT-offers greater capabilities in multienergy CT as well as spatial resolution as good as 125 µm. Finally, artificial intelligence is poised to impact both the creation and processing of CT images, as well as automating many tasks to provide greater accuracy and reproducibility in quantitative applications.