Innovations in topical ocular corticosteroid therapy for the management of postoperative ocular inflammation and pain.

Topical ophthalmic corticosteroids are of clinical benefit in the management of pain and inflammation after ocular surgery; however, their use can be associated with class-associated adverse events (AEs) and limited bioavailability. Selection of an appropriate topical corticosteroid depends on drug-specific variables such as AE profile, efficacy, potency, dosing, patient-specific administration needs, and formulation properties aimed at minimizing precorneal drug loss, increasing ocular surface drug residence time, and maximizing drug delivery to the anterior tissues. Recently, strategies for improving ocular penetration of ophthalmic formulations have included use of mucoadhesive formulations (ie, polycarbophil-containing gels) and drug particle size reduction, enabling faster drug dissolution and therefore increased bioavailability and penetration. Loteprednol etabonate (LE) is a carbon-20 ester corticosteroid developed through retrometabolic drug design with potent anti-inflammatory effects and a reduced propensity for eliciting corticosteroid class AEs. This drug has been formulated for topical ophthalmic use after surgery as 0.5% and 1% suspensions, a 0.5% ointment, and a 0.5% gel. Preclinical and clinical data for a new 0.38% LE gel will be reviewed demonstrating that reducing the drug particle size to the nanometer range in diameter provides effective ocular tissue penetration and resolution of pain and inflammation despite a reduced drug concentration (0.38%) and dosing frequency.

Corneal Cross-Linking: Current USA Status: Report From the Cornea Society.

The initial published clinical report on riboflavin/ultraviolet A corneal cross-linking (CXL) for treatment of progressive keratoconus dates back to 2003. CXL has since then been widely used outside the United States for treatment of progressive keratoconus and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Avedro Inc.'s corneal cross-linking system (KXL) for treatment of patients with progressive keratoconus and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia in April 2016. The procedure is not currently approved for stable keratoconus. There are 2 FDA-approved topical ophthalmic solutions for use in CXL. Riboflavin 5'-phosphate in 20% dextran ophthalmic solution 0.146% (Photrexa Viscous) and Riboflavin 5'-phosphate ophthalmic solution 0.146% (Photrexa) are intended for use with the KXL system. Photrexa Viscous is used in all CXL procedures, whereas Photrexa is indicated for use when the corneal stroma is thinner than 400 µm after completion of the Photrexa Viscous induction period. The FDA-approved procedure using the Dresden protocol (UV-A, 3 mW/cm for 30 min) induces cytologic and morphologic changes in the anterior 250 to 300 µm of the corneal stroma. It has been believed that a minimum thickness of 400 µm was necessary to protect the corneal endothelium from potential damage. The CXL procedure using the standard Dresden protocol is established as the gold standard for treatment of progressive keratoconus. CXL treatment is indicated for a list of conditions ranging from corneal ectasia to infectious keratitis. Newer protocols, treatment regimens, and expanded indications will require further refinements, investigations, and long-term studies.

U.S. Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Treatment of Corneal Ectasia after Refractive Surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for the treatment of corneal ectasia after laser refractive surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-nine subjects with corneal ectasia after previous refractive surgery. METHODS: The treatment group underwent standard CXL, and the sham control group received riboflavin alone without removal of the epithelium. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy criterion was the change over 1 year of topography-derived maximum keratometry (K), comparing treatment with control groups. Secondary outcomes evaluated were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, endothelial cell count, and adverse events. RESULTS: In the crosslinking treatment group, the maximum K value decreased by 0.7 diopters (D) from baseline to 1 year, whereas there was continued progression in the control group (1.3 D difference between treatment and control, P < 0.0001). In the treatment group, the maximum K value decreased by 2.0 D or more in 14 eyes (18%) and increased by 2.0 D or more in 3 eyes (4%). The CDVA improved by an average of 5.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) letters. Twenty-three eyes (32%) gained and 3 eyes (4%) lost 10 or more logMAR letters. The UDVA improved 4.5 logMAR letters. Corneal haze was the most frequently reported crosslinking-related adverse finding. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal collagen crosslinking was effective in improving the maximum K value, CDVA, and UDVA in eyes with corneal ectasia 1 year after treatment, with an excellent safety profile. CXL is the first approved procedure to diminish progression of this ectatic corneal process.

United States Multicenter Clinical Trial of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Treatment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with progressive keratoconus (n = 205). METHODS: The treatment group underwent standard CXL and the sham control group received riboflavin alone without removal of the epithelium. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy criterion was the change over 1 year of topography-derived maximum keratometry value, comparing treatment with control group. Secondary outcomes evaluated were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, endothelial cell count, and adverse events. RESULTS: In the CXL treatment group, the maximum keratometry value decreased by 1.6 diopters (D) from baseline to 1 year, whereas keratoconus continued to progress in the control group. In the treatment group, the maximum keratometry value decreased by 2.0 D or more in 28 eyes (31.5%) and increased by 2.0 D or more in 5 eyes (5.6%). The CDVA improved by an average of 5.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units. Twenty-three eyes (27.7%) gained and 5 eyes lost (6.0%) 10 logMAR or more. The UDVA improved 4.4 logMAR. Corneal haze was the most frequently reported CXL-related adverse finding. There were no significant changes in endothelial cell count 1 year after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal collagen crosslinking was effective in improving the maximum keratometry value, CDVA, and UCVA in eyes with progressive keratoconus 1 year after treatment, with an excellent safety profile. Corneal collagen crosslinking affords the keratoconic patient an important new option to decrease progression of this ectatic corneal process.

Dysfunctional tear syndrome: dry eye disease and associated tear film disorders - new strategies for diagnosis and treatment.

Dysfunctional tear syndrome (DTS) is a common and complex condition affecting the ocular surface. The health and normal functioning of the ocular surface is dependent on a stable and sufficient tear film. Clinician awareness of conditions affecting the ocular surface has increased in recent years because of expanded research and the publication of diagnosis and treatment guidelines pertaining to disorders resulting in DTS, including the Delphi panel treatment recommendations for DTS (2006), the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) (2007), the Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) Workshop (2011), and the updated Preferred Practice Pattern guidelines from the American Academy of Ophthalmology pertaining to dry eye and blepharitis (2013). Since the publication of the existing guidelines, new diagnostic techniques and treatment options that provide an opportunity for better management of patients have become available. Clinicians are now able to access a wealth of information that can help them obtain a differential diagnosis and treatment approach for patients presenting with DTS. This review provides a practical and directed approach to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with DTS, emphasizing treatment that is tailored to the specific disease subtype as well as the severity of the condition.

Lasik Xtra® Provides Corneal Stability and Improved Outcomes.

A new procedure which combines LASIK and corneal cross-linking (Lasik Xtra®) has been proposed as an alternative to traditional LASIK. It is aimed at restoring strength to the cornea, increasing stability in visual outcomes, increasing the accuracy of the refractive correction, and potentially lowering enhancement rates. This article reviews the current clinical evidence which has been published on the topic and reviews both the safety and efficacy argument for the procedure.

Bromfenac ophthalmic solution for the treatment of postoperative ocular pain and inflammation: safety, efficacy, and patient adherence.

Ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used by clinicians to manage ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery. Over the past decade, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved multiple topical NSAIDs for these purposes, including several reformulated products. One of these medications, bromfenac ophthalmic solution, has a long and extensive history, with proven efficacy and safety in patients following cataract surgery. The evolution of bromfenac ophthalmic solution over the years has involved either lowering the concentration of the active ingredient or extending the dosing interval to improve patient adherence/compliance. This review will focus on the history and progression of bromfenac ophthalmic solution and report the available patient preference and adherence data regarding this ocular NSAID throughout its evolution.

Loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic gel 0.5% following cataract surgery: integrated analysis of two clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of loteprednol etabonate (LE) gel 0.5% compared with vehicle in the treatment of postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery, using the integrated analysis of data from two identical, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, vehicle-controlled trials. METHODS: Patients with anterior chamber cell (ACC) inflammation ≥ grade 2 (6-15 cells) 1 day post-surgery were randomized to receive 1 or 2 drops of LE gel 0.5% or vehicle 4 times per day instilled in the study eye for 14 days. Primary outcome measures included the proportion of patients with complete resolution of ACC and grade 0 (no) pain on postoperative Day 8. Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs), changes from baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity (VA), biomicroscopy, and funduscopy findings. Gel comfort was graded by patients according to drop sensation. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population included 813 patients (409 LE gel 0.5% and 404 vehicle). At postoperative Day 8, 30.8% and 15.1% of patients randomized to LE gel 0.5% or vehicle, respectively, had complete resolution of ACC, while 74.3% and 43.8% of patients, respectively, had grade 0 pain (P < 0.001 for both). Tolerability assessments for ocular itching, photophobia, and tearing favored LE gel 0.5% compared with vehicle at different time points beginning at Day 3. Two patients in the LE gel 0.5% group and 1 patient in the vehicle group exhibited a transient treatment-emergent increase in IOP ≥ 10 mmHg. Treatment-related AEs were generally mild to moderate and occurred less frequently with LE gel 0.5% than with vehicle. Reports of treatment-related blurred vision were rare (n = 2, vehicle). CONCLUSION: LE gel 0.5% was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of postoperative pain and inflammation following ocular surgery, with minimal risk of IOP elevation.

Efficacy and safety of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel in the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy and safety of a new gel formulation loteprednol etabonate 0.5% in the treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery. SETTING: Seventeen United States clinical sites. DESIGN: Prospective double-masked parallel-group study. METHODS: Patients with anterior chamber cell (ACC) grade 2 or higher after cataract surgery were randomized to loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel or vehicle 4 times a day for 14 days. Primary outcome measures included the proportion of patients with complete resolution of ACC and grade 0 (no) pain on postoperative day 8. Safety measures included adverse events, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, biomicroscopy and funduscopy findings, and tolerability (ocular symptoms and drop comfort). RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population included 406 patients (203 per treatment). On day 8, 30.5% of patients in the loteprednol etabonate group and 16.3% of patients in the vehicle group had complete resolution of ACC, whereas 72.9% and 41.9%, respectively, had grade 0 pain (both P<.001). Significant treatment differences for complete resolution of ACC and grade 0 pain favoring loteprednol etabonate were also found on day 15 and day 18. One patient in each treatment group had a significant increase in IOP (≥ 10 mm Hg). Analyses of pain, photophobia, and tearing favored loteprednol etabonate at different time points beginning on day 3. More than 85% of patients in each treatment group reported no discomfort on drop instillation. CONCLUSION: Loteprednol etabonate gel 0.5% was efficacious and safe in treating postoperative inflammation and pain. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Rajpal is a consultant to Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Allergan, Inc., and Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Dr. Siou-Mermet and Ms. Erb are employees of Bausch & Lomb, Inc. Dr. Roel has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Intraocular pressure elevations with loteprednol etabonate: a retrospective chart review.

PURPOSE: Ocular corticosteroids can cause elevations in intraocular pressure (IOP). The purpose of this study was to characterize the timing and severity of IOP elevations in patients receiving loteprednol etabonate 0.5% or loteprednol etabonate 0.5%/tobramycin 0.3%. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at 5 academic and private practices. Any patient who experienced an elevation in IOP ≥5 mm Hg while using loteprednol etabonate or loteprednol etabonate/tobramycin was eligible for inclusion in the study. Data collected included patient demographics, medical and ophthalmic history, concomitant medications, reason for treatment, IOP, and medical and surgical interventions. RESULTS: Fifty patients experienced IOP elevations after use of topical loteprednol etabonate and were included in the study. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) patient age was 58.8 (20.3) years and 66% were women. The most common reasons for prescribing loteprednol etabonate were dry eye (30%), postoperative therapy (22%), and allergic conjunctivitis (16%). Before treatment, 28% of patients had a history of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Mean (SD) IOP before treatment was 15.5 (3.2) mm Hg and increased to a mean (SD) of 24.7 (6.5) mm Hg, a statistically significant increase of 9.2 (SD: 5.8; range: 5-29) mm Hg (P<0.0001). The median duration of treatment with loteprednol etabonate at the time of observed IOP elevation was 55 days (range: 3 days to 3 years). Twenty-four percent of patients required IOP-lowering medications and 8% required surgery to control the elevated IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Alternatives to corticosteroids should be considered when long-term treatment is required for an ocular surface condition.

Twice-daily, preservative-free ketorolac 0.45% for treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily, preservative-free ketorolac 0.45% (Acuvail; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California, USA) administration for treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. METHODS: Two multicenter, double-masked studies randomized 511 cataract surgery patients (2:1) to receive twice-daily ketorolac 0.45% or vehicle in the operative eye for 16 days, beginning 1 day before surgery. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a summed ocular inflammation score of 0 for anterior chamber cell and flare on postoperative day 14. The main secondary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with no pain on postoperative day 1. RESULTS: On day 14, 52.5% of ketorolac patients and 26.5% of vehicle patients had an summed ocular inflammation score of 0 (P < .001). On day 1, 72.4% of ketorolac patients and 39.7% of vehicle patients had a pain score of 0 (P < .001). Median time to pain resolution was 1 day in the ketorolac group and 2 days in the vehicle group (P < .001). The percentage of ketorolac and vehicle patients who had a +3-line or more improvement in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline was 60.5% versus 44.0% on day 14 (P = .002). Overall, adverse events were more prevalent in the vehicle group than in the ketorolac group (48.5% vs 35.2%; P = .004). Burning or stinging (per a composite Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) was reported by 1.5% of ketorolac patients and 0.6% of vehicle patients. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-daily ketorolac 0.45% was well tolerated and effectively treated inflammation and pain following cataract surgery.