ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Asthma affects 5% to 13% of pregnant women, and many require daily pharmacotherapy to achieve asthma control; however, adherence to medication during pregnancy often decreases. OBJECTIVE: To understand the association between the use of or adherence to asthma medication with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Using linked population-based administrative databases from Alberta, Canada (2012-2018), pregnant women with asthma were categorized based on asthma medication use 1 year before pregnancy: short-acting ß-agonists (SABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and ICS with long-acting ß-agonists (ICS+LABA). Women on ICS+LABA were grouped by trajectory of adherence during pregnancy using group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the associations between the use of or trajectories of adherence to asthma medication during pregnancy with asthma exacerbation and maternal/neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 13,509 of 238,751 (5.7%) pregnant women had asthma before pregnancy (SABA: 24.7%; ICS: 12.5%; ICS+LABA: 25.1%; none: 36.1%). The use of SABA (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21, 2.64), ICS (aOR: 3.37, 95% CI: 2.10, 5.39), and ICS+LABA (aOR: 3.64, 95% CI: 2.57, 5.17) had greater odds of disease exacerbation than no asthma medication during pregnancy. ICS+LABA adherence groups during pregnancy included low (79.8%), moderate-to-decreasing (14.0%), and moderate-to-increasing (6.2%). The moderate-to-decreasing (aOR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.84) and moderate-to-increasing (aOR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.83) adherence groups had greater odds of disease exacerbation than the low adherence group. ICS use during pregnancy decreased odds of preterm birth (aOR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.99) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.97). Other group comparisons were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows the importance of continuing asthma maintenance medication during pregnancy to improve outcomes. Future research should study the postpartum and long-term outcomes with asthma medication during pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents , Asthma , Medication Adherence , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Pregnancy , Female , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/epidemiology , Adult , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Infant, Newborn , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Alberta/epidemiology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Administration, Inhalation , Disease Progression , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Rationale & Objective: Female reproductive health is recognized as a predictor of morbidity, mortality, and quality of life, although data in the setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are limited. Study Design: A mixed-methods study was employed. Phase 1 was an anonymous, internet-based survey. Phase 2 was semistructured interviews offered to all respondents upon survey completion. Setting & Participants: The survey was disseminated internationally from October 4, 2021, to January 7, 2022, to individuals aged 18-50 years with both a uterus and CKD diagnosis. Outcomes: Menstrual health and contraceptive use by CKD stage (dialysis, nondialysis CKD, and transplant). Analytical Approach: Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Interview data were analyzed using the framework method of analysis. Results: Of 152 respondents, 98 (mean age 33 ± 0.7 years; n = 20 dialysis, n = 59 nondialysis CKD, n = 19 transplant) satisfied the inclusion criteria, representing 3 continents. The most common causes of CKD among survey respondents were hereditary causes in dialysis (n = 6, 30%) and glomerulonephritis in nondialysis CKD (n = 22, 37%) and transplant (n = 6, 32%). The majority reported heavy menstrual bleeding (n = 12, 86% dialysis; n = 46, 94% nondialysis CKD; n = 14, 100% transplant). Less than half of participants were consistently able to afford period products. Condoms were the most common contraceptive reported. Most participants reported no contraceptive use (n = 10, 50% dialysis; n = 37, 63% nondialysis CKD; n = 7, 37% transplant), primarily because of "fear". Interviews (n = 6) revealed a perception of a relationship between kidney function and menstrual health, concerns about contraceptive use, and a desire for greater multidisciplinary care to improve kidney and reproductive health. Limitations: Self-reported outcomes, need for internet access and a device. Conclusions: Abnormal menstruation and period poverty (ie, inability to afford period products and the socioeconomic consequences of menstruation) were common, and contraceptive use was low among female individuals with CKD, highlighting an important gap in the sex-specific care of this population. Plain-Language Summary: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in female individuals is accompanied by menstrual disorders and low contraceptive use. However, most data are limited to the dialysis and transplant populations. Therefore, this mixed-methods study aimed to describe self-assessed menstruation and contraceptive use across all stages of CKD. People aged 18-50 years with a uterus and CKD diagnosis were invited to participate in an online survey shared internationally as well as an optional telephone interview. Abnormal menstruation and period poverty (ie, inability to afford period products and the socioeconomic consequences of menstruation) were common, and contraceptive use was low among female individuals with CKD, highlighting an important gap in the sex-specific care of this population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent U.S. immigration policy has increasingly focused on asylum deterrence and has been used extensively to rapidly deport and deter asylum-seekers, leaving thousands of would-be asylum-seekers waiting indefinitely in Mexican border cities, a large and growing proportion of whom are pregnant and parenting women. In the border city of Tijuana, Mexico, these women are spending unprecedented durations waiting under unsafe humanitarian conditions to seek safety in the U.S, with rising concerns regarding increases in gender-based violence (GBV) among this population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given existing gaps in evidence, we aimed to describe the lived experiences of GBV in the context of asylum deterrence policies among pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women at the Mexico-U.S. border. METHODS: Within the community-based Maternal and Infant Health for Refugee & Asylum-Seeking Women (MIHRA) study, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 30 asylum-seeking women in Tijuana, Mexico between June and December 2022. Eligible women had been pregnant or postpartum since March 2020, were 18-49 years old, and migrated for the purposes of seeking asylum in the U.S. Drawing on conceptualizations of structural and legal violence, we conducted a thematic analysis of participants' experiences of GBV in the context of asylum deterrence policies and COVID-19. RESULTS: Pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women routinely faced multiple forms of GBV perpetuated by asylum deterrence policies at all stages of migration (pre-migration, in transit, and in Tijuana). Indefinite wait times to cross the border and inadequate/unsafe shelter exacerbated further vulnerability to GBV. Repeated exposure to GBV contributed to poor mental health among women who reported feelings of fear, isolation, despair, shame, and anxiety. The lack of supports and legal recourse related to GBV in Tijuana highlighted the impact of asylum deterrence policies on this ongoing humanitarian crisis. CONCLUSION: Asylum deterrence policies undermine the health and safety of pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women at the Mexico-U.S. border. There is an urgent need to end U.S. asylum deterrence policies and to provide respectful, appropriate, and adequately resourced humanitarian supports to pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women in border cities, to reduce women's risk of GBV and trauma.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gender-Based Violence , Infant , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Mexico , Pandemics , ParentingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Given the prevalence of women seeking surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), there is a need to understand women's decision-making regarding uterine-preserving versus hysterectomy-based surgeries. Historically, hysterectomy-based surgeries have been the preferred treatment for pelvic organ prolapse; however, contemporary evidence supports uterine-preserving surgeries as equivalent. At present, the lack of information available to the general public and limited options presented at surgical consultation for pelvic organ prolapse may hinder women's autonomy as they navigate surgical treatment. OBJECTIVES: To examine the factors affecting women's decision-making processes regarding uterine-preserving or hysterectomy-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. DESIGN: This is a qualitative study. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with women seeking surgery for pelvic organ prolapse to explore the factors affecting women's decision-making between hysterectomy-based and uterine-preserving surgeries. RESULTS: Women (n = 26) used clinical and personal factors to determine which surgery was best. Women noted that the lack of evidence (clinical and/or anecdotal) available to them hindered their decision-making, causing them to rely more on their own interpretations of the evidence, what they perceived to be "normal," and what their surgeon recommended. Even with standardized discussion regarding the existing clinical equipoise between surgeries at the clinical consultation, some women still had misperceptions that hysterectomy-based surgery would convey the lowest risk of prolapse recurrence and be best for severe prolapse. CONCLUSION: There is a need for more transparency in discussions about prolapse and the factors affecting women's decision-making for surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Clinicians should be prepared to offer the option of hysterectomy-based or uterine-preserving surgeries and to clearly explain the clinical equipoise between these procedures.
Subject(s)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Surgeons , Female , Humans , Male , Hysterectomy , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Qualitative Research , Referral and ConsultationABSTRACT
In addition to altering public infrastructure and social patterning, the COVID-19 pandemic has delayed many pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries. POP-related stigma, symptomology and the experience of waiting for POP surgery can negatively impact women's quality of life and mental health. The experience of preoperative POP patients during the pandemic thus entails a new intersection of gendered, stigmatic and medical realities. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 preoperative POP patients as part of a larger qualitative study, 20 of whom spontaneously volunteered information about how the pandemic coloured their experience living with and awaiting surgery for POP. Interviews occurred between January and July 2021, which coincided with the second and third waves of the pandemic in Alberta, Canada, and before full immunisation was available for all Albertans. Pandemic-related interview excerpts were thematically analysed, and four main findings emerged. (1) Though surgical delay meant living with unpleasant symptoms for longer than anticipated, some sought this out in order to protect vulnerable loved ones from possible hospital-acquired infection, (2) shifting and unclear hospital policies and logistics resulted in intense preoperative stress, at times causing women to temporarily cease treatment, (3) decreased access to public restroom infrastructure caused women to reduce their outings and (4) the imperative to minimise social gatherings made it easier for women to engage in POP-related, shame-based self-isolation without the notice of friends and family. As they can influence postoperative outcomes and treatment adherence, trends observed should be of interest to clinicians and policymakers alike.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Humans , Female , Pandemics , Quality of Life , Alberta/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/epidemiology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/psychologyABSTRACT
Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) occurs when one or more pelvic organs descend into or through the vaginal opening, significantly impacting physical and mental health. POP affects the female reproductive tract and, overwhelmingly, people who identify as women. However, little research has examined the impact of gendered expectations on women's treatment-seeking for POP and their decision-making around surgery for POP. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 26 women seeking surgery for POP in Alberta, Canada. Data were analyzed from a gender-based lens, using the Framework Method. Participants reported the need to balance their identities as women, partners, and mothers in their pursuit of treatment and faced many barriers to treatment related to their gendered responsibilities. Findings highlight the gendered experiences of prolapse in the context of healthcare needs and can inform policies and practices which promote more equitable access to prolapse treatment.
Subject(s)
Mothers , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Alberta , Female , Humans , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/psychology , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , VaginaABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether patient characteristics were associated with gender expression, and to further determine impact of gender expression on patient selection of hysterectomy or uterine-preservation in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. METHODS: Within a prospective cohort, a self-reported gender expression tool classified patients as expressing gender polar (i.e., reporting only feminine traits) or non-polar gender scores (i.e., reporting feminine and masculine traits). Multivariate modeling explored associations of gender expression with traditional socio-demographic variables, and with selection of hysterectomy or uterine-preserving surgery. Descriptive statistics of socio-demographic variables were reported by frequency, proportion and mean (SD). RESULTS: 177 participants completed the gender score questionnaire. Overall, the sample had a more feminine gender expression with the majority of respondents classified as gender polar (67.23%, n = 119). Participants with non-polar gender scores were 2.53 times (95% 1.05-6.09) more likely to choose uterine preservation versus hysterectomy-based surgery. Gender polarity was weakly associated with age, but no other sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSION: Gender expression is not tightly associated with socio-demographic variables, and is thus a novel measurement in gynecologic research. Gender polarity appears to be associated with choice to undergo hysterectomy. Further research is required to understand this relationship and implications in clinical outcomes.
Subject(s)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Hysterectomy/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterus/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a multidimensional reproductive health issue, which negatively affects women's sexual well-being. Using the circular sexual response cycle as a framework, we sought to evaluate women's sexual experiences living with POP. METHODS: Measures of genital self-image, sexual distress, sexual satisfaction, and sexual function were administered before conducting semistructured interviews. Participants were 16 heterosexual partnered women seeking surgical and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic POP. RESULTS: Standardized questionnaires indicated normal genital self-image, sexual satisfaction, and sexual function; however, sexual distress scores exceeded normal cutoffs. Eight themes emerged, including reasons for having sex, willingness to initiate and sexual receptivity, contextual factors, sexual stimuli, sexual arousal, responsive desire, outcomes, and spontaneous sexual desire. In contrast to quantitative findings, themes demonstrated sexual difficulty. Women with POP mainly engage in sex out of obligation and report reduced sexual initiation and receptiveness, as well as a negative impact on genital self-image. Pelvic organ prolapse was perceived to adversely affect subjective arousal, responsive desire, and spontaneous desire, despite intact physiological arousal. Difficulty experiencing subjective arousal was profound and seemed to be limited by preoccupation with POP. Sexual satisfaction and rewards were diminished after POP, including orgasmic capacity. Rewarding motivators to engage in sex were seldom discussed and often overshadowed by experiencing guilt and obligation related to sex. CONCLUSIONS: The circular sexual response cycle largely fit participants' experiences; however, POP inhibits subjective arousal, which prevents responsive desire for many. Patients may need better support to cope with preoccupation with POP, indicating that addressing the psychosocial symptoms of POP should be prioritized.
Subject(s)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Quality of Life , Female , Humans , Libido , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Sexual Behavior , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of pelvic organs into the vagina resulting in bulge symptoms and occurs in approximately 50% of women. Almost 20% of women will elect surgical correction of this condition by age 85. Removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) with concomitant vaginal vault suspension is a long-standing practice in POP surgery to address apical (uterine) prolapse. Yet, contemporary evidence on the merits of this approach relative to preservation of the uterus through suspension is needed to better inform surgical decision making by patients and their healthcare providers. The objective of this study is to evaluate POP-specific health outcomes and service utilisation of women electing uterine suspension compared with those electing hysterectomy and vaginal vault suspension for POP surgery up to 1-year postsurgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective cohort study planning to enrol 321 adult women with stage ≥2 POP from multiple sites in Alberta, Canada. Following standardised counselling from study surgeons, participants self-select either a hysterectomy based or uterine preservation surgical group. Data are being collected through participant questionnaires, medical records and administrative data linkage at four time points spanning from the presurgical consultation to 1-year postsurgery. The primary outcome is anatomic failure to correct POP, and secondary outcomes include changes in positioning of pelvic structures, retreatment, subjective report of bulge symptoms, pelvic floor distress and impact, sexual function and health service use. Data will be analysed using inverse probability weighting of propensity scores and generalised linear models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (REB19-2134). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, presentations at national and international conferences, and educational handouts for patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04890951.
Subject(s)
Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Uterine Prolapse , Aged, 80 and over , Alberta , Cohort Studies , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Hysterectomy , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Prolapse/surgery , Vagina/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Rapid repeat pregnancy (RRP), a birth occurring within 33 months of a previous birth, is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. RRP occurs among 25%-35% of adolescents who become pregnant. The current study examines trends in and outcomes of adolescent RRP in the Canadian context. METHODS: Using population-based data from the Discharge Abstract Database, we linked maternal and newborn records from labour and delivery hospitalizations across Canada (excluding Québec) from fiscal years 2004/2005 to 2014/2015. Women were included if they were aged younger than 20 years at the index birth event and delivered an infant during the study period. We assessed absolute rates of RRP and differences between groups using χ2 tests. Linear tests for trend assessed change over time. Conditional logistic regression models assessed odds of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in RRPs compared with first pregnancies. RESULTS: Overall, we captured 67 957 adolescent pregnancies during the study period. Of these, 32.9% (95% CI 32.5%-33.2%) had an RRP. Rates of RRP were higher among 18- to 19-year-olds (34.1%; 95% CI 33.6%-34.5%) than 15- to 17-year-olds (30.4%; 95% CI 29.7%-31.0%). There was substantial variation in RRP rates across provinces and territories, from 24.5% (95% CI 23.6%-35.6%) in British Columbia to 47.3% (95% CI 46.1%-48.4%) in Manitoba. Generally, the odds of maternal or neonatal morbidity were similar in second pregnancies. However, adolescents had decreased odds of having a small-for-gestational-age infant in their second pregnancy (P < 0.001), affecting 0.4% (95% CI 0.3%-0.7%) of second pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who experience a pregnancy are at high risk of experiencing an RRP; however, odds of maternal and neonatal morbidity were similar in second and first pregnancies.
Subject(s)
Birth Intervals , Pregnancy in Adolescence/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Maternal Age , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominant hereditary disorder which affects cardiovascular structure and function. With medical advances, more women with MFS experience pregnancy, which may increase maternal and neonatal risk. Existing research has been limited by small or clinical samples. This study examines the association of MFS and adverse maternal, neonatal, and obstetric outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the discharge abstract database, containing all labor and delivery hospitalizations in Canada (excluding Quebec) from fiscal years 2004-2015 where women delivered a live- or stillbirth. We measured maternal and neonatal morbidity, preterm births (<37 weeks), small-for-gestational-age births, perinatal mortality, and adverse maternal cardiovascular events. For each outcome, we calculated the absolute risk for women with and without MFS and used generalized estimating equations with a logit function to calculate odds. RESULTS: Overall, 2,682,461 women delivered a live or stillborn infant in Canada during the study period, with 135 birth events to women with MFS. Women with MFS did not have significantly higher odds of severe maternal morbidity during their delivery (aOR:1.3; 95%CI: 0.4-4.0). Similarly, their infants did not have significantly higher odds of neonatal morbidity. However, infants born to women with MFS were significantly more likely to be born preterm (aOR:2.6; 95%CI: 1.6-4.3) and to be small-for-gestational-age (aOR:1.8; 95%CI:1.0-3.1). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study indicates that, although some women with MFS may experience higher odds of maternal and/or neonatal morbidity during labor and delivery, the majority of women with MFS can have healthy births with proper clinical management.
Subject(s)
Marfan Syndrome , Premature Birth , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Marfan Syndrome/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Premature Birth/etiology , StillbirthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Turner syndrome (TS) occurs in approximately 1 in 2500 live female births and is caused by the partial or complete loss of one of the X chromosomes, resulting in abnormalities such as ovarian failure and infertility. However, pregnancy in women with TS may still occur via spontaneous pregnancy or through oocyte donation. Limited data exists on pregnancy in women with TS that could aid in clinical care. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study using data from the Discharge Abstract Database (2004-2015), which contains all labor and delivery hospitalizations across Canada (excluding Quebec) where women delivered a live or stillborn infant. The odds of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes for women with and without TS were calculated using backwards multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations, adjusting for the Obstetric Comorbidity Index, mode of delivery, and year. RESULTS: Overall, 2,682,284 women delivered a live or stillborn infant during the study period and 44 birth events occurred for women with TS. No severe maternal morbidity or adverse cardiovascular events occurred for women with TS at their labor and delivery hospitalization. However, infants born to women with TS were 3.6 times more likely (95% CI: 1.7-7.8) to experience neonatal morbidity than those born to women without TS. These infants also were more likely to have had a preterm birth (aOR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.6-5.4) and to be small-for-gestational-age (aOR: 4.5, 95% CI: 2.4-8.4). CONCLUSION: This study adds further understanding of the likelihood of adverse outcomes for pregnant women with TS.
Subject(s)
Premature Birth , Turner Syndrome , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Stillbirth , Turner Syndrome/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Importance: With the help of medical advances, more women with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) are becoming pregnant. Adverse maternal, obstetric, and neonatal events occur more frequently in women with ACHD than in the general obstetric population. Adult congenital heart disease is heterogeneous, yet few studies have assessed whether maternal and neonatal outcomes differ across ACHD subtypes. Objective: To assess the association of ACHD and its subtypes with pregnancy, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the Discharge Abstract Database, which contains information on all hospitalizations in Canada (except Quebec) from fiscal years 2001-2002 through 2014-2015. Discharge Abstract Database information was linked with maternal and infant hospital records across Canada. All women who gave birth in hospitals during the study period were included in the study. Data were analyzed from December 18, 2017, to March 22, 2019. Exposures: Women with ACHD were identified using diagnostic and procedural codes. Subtypes of ACHD were classified using the Anatomic and Clinical Classification of Congenital Heart Defects scheme. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were defined a priori and included severe maternal morbidity (measured using the Maternal Morbidity Outcomes Indicator), neonatal morbidity and mortality (measured using the Neonatal Adverse Outcomes Indicator), ischemic placental disease, preterm birth, congenital anomalies, and small-for-gestational-age births. Absolute and relative rates of each outcome were calculated overall and by ACHD subtype. Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations assessed crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for each outcome in women with ACHD compared with women without ACHD after adjustment for comorbidities, mode of delivery, and study year. Results: The 2114 women with ACHD included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 29.4 [5.7] years) had significantly higher odds of maternal morbidity (aOR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.2-3.4) and neonatal morbidity and mortality (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.1) compared with women without ACHD (n = 2â¯682â¯451). Substantial variation was observed between women with different subtypes of ACHD. For example, the aORs of preterm birth (<37 weeks) varied from 0.4 (95% CI, 0.4-0.5) for women with anomalies of atrioventricular junctions and valves to 4.7 (95% CI, 2.9-7.5) for women with complex anomalies of atrioventricular connections. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that women with different subtypes of ACHD are not uniformly at risk for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Although some women with ACHD can potentially expect healthy pregnancies, it appears that clinical care should be modified to address the heightened risks of certain ACHD subtypes.
Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/complications , Humans , Infant , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the impacts of structural violence on women and how this can influence their trajectory into and their sustainable exits from homelessness. METHODS: The research is qualitative and community-based, including 15 interviews with mothers living in emergency shelters and a group interview with nine professionals. An advisory group was formed through partnership with community services to provide project oversight and guide and interpret the results. A member check group consisting of seven mothers with recent experiences of homelessness was engaged to further refine findings and implications. The research team used Critical Social Theory, in particular feminist theory, as an analysis framework in order to account for the implications of structural violence on mothers with diverse and complex histories. RESULTS: The results highlight three structural-level factors: gendered pathways into homelessness, systems of support that create structural barriers, and disjointed services that exacerbate trauma. CONCLUSION: The authors propose systems-level changes rooted in trauma-informed approaches to facilitate a sustainable exit from homelessness for mothers and their children.