Primary Tumor Sidedness Associated with Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes in Colon Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Background: Recent investigations have suggested that-sidedness is associated with the prognosis of colon cancer patients. However, the role of sidedness in surgical outcome is unclear. In this study, we tried to demonstrate the real role of sidedness in postoperative results for colon cancer patients receiving surgical intervention. Methods: This is a propensity score matching study using the database of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2009 to 2013. Sidedness groups including right-sided and left-sided colon cancer were created according to the associated diagnosis and procedure codes. Postoperative 30-day mortality, morbidity, overall complications, and total length of hospital stay were analyzed after performing propensity score matching. Results: Out of a total of 24,436 colon cancer patients who received associated operations, 15,945 patients had right-sided cancer and 8941 patients had left-sided cancer. Right-sided colon cancer patients were accompanied by more preoperative comorbidities including old age, female sex, hypertension, dyspnea, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (SMD > 0.1). Postoperative mortality, morbidities including re-intubation, bleeding, urinary tract infection and deep vein thrombosis, postoperative overall complications, and total length of hospital stay were significantly associated with right-sided cancer (p < 0.05). After 1:1 propensity score matching, postoperative mortality was not significantly different between right-sided cancer (2.3%) and left-sided cancer (2.4%) patients. The patients with left-sided colon cancer had significantly more postoperative morbidities, more overall complications, and longer total length of hospital stay. Conclusions: Poor clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes were noted in right-sided cancer patients. After propensity score matching, left-sided cancer patients had worse postoperative outcomes than those with right-sided cancer.

Increased Pathologic Downstaging with Induction versus Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy-A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is the recommended treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. The optimal sequence of TNT is debated: induction (chemotherapy first) or consolidation (chemoradiation first)? We aim to evaluate the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy with either induction or consolidation regiments in the United States for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database for patients with clinical stage II or stage III rectal cancer, diagnosed between 2006 and 2017, who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2017, we identified 8999 patients and found that the utilization of induction chemotherapy increased from 2.0% to 35.0%. TNT resulted in pathologic downstaging 46.7% of the time and a pathologic complete response 11.6% of the time. Induction chemotherapy lead to higher pathologic downstaging (58% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001) and pathologic complete responses (16.8% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Similar trends held true in a multivariate analysis and subset analysis of stage II and III disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that induction chemotherapy may be preferred over consolidation chemotherapy when downstaging prior to oncologic resection is desired. The optimal treatment plan for total neoadjuvant therapy is multi-factorial and requires further elucidation.

Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Outcomes in Diverticular Disease Undergoing Elective Colectomy-A Retrospective Cohort Study from the ACS-NSQIP Database.

Recommendations for elective colectomies after recovery from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis should be individualized. The kinds of associated risk factors that should be considered for this approach remain undetermined. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative outcomes in patients with diverticular disease after receiving an elective colectomy. This is a retrospective study using the multi-institutional, nationally validated database of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). The patients who were diagnosed with diverticular disease and received an elective colectomy were included in our risk factor analyses. Postoperative mortality, morbidity, and overall complications were measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to demonstrate the risk factors. We analyzed 30,468 patients with diverticular disease, 67% of whom received an elective colectomy. The rate of 30-day mortality was 0.2%, and superficial surgical site infection was the most common postoperative morbidity (7.2%) in the elective colectomies. The independent risk factors associated with overall complications were age ≥ 75, BMI ≥ 30, smoking status, dyspnea, hypertension, current kidney dialysis, chronic steroid use, ASA III, and open colectomy. In laparoscopic colectomy, 67.5% of the elective colectomies, the associated risk factors associated with overall complications still included age ≥ 75, smoking, hypertension, chronic steroid use, and ASA III. Identification of patient-specific risk factors may inform the decision-making process for elective colectomy and reduce the postoperative complications after mitigation of those risk factors.

Career Transitions: What Are Other Options to Clinical Practice That May Align with New or Evolving Priorities/Goals?

Career transitions are an essential part of the evolution of one's professional life. Transitions can take place at any time and for a variety of reasons. In this article, I review career transitions in the context of my own experiences and offer some advice and guidelines for making a career transition. The article also reviews what opportunities exist for career development and how that can lead to new and future prospects. Finally, achieving work-life balance can be difficult in today's health care landscape. Setting priorities and revisiting one's life plan on a regular basis establishes a professional "true north" to help navigate the challenges and disruptions of health care.

Autologous Fat Grafting: an Emerging Treatment Option for Complex Anal Fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has shown promise in the treatment of complex wounds, with trials reporting good healing rates and safety profile. We aim to investigate the role of AFG in managing complex anorectal fistulas. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database. We examined the rates of symptom improvement, clinical closure of fistula tracts, recurrence, complications, and worsening fecal incontinence. Perianal disease activity index (PDAI) was obtained for patients undergoing combination of AFG and fistula plug treatment. RESULTS: In total, 52 unique patients underwent 81 procedures, of which Crohn's was present in 34 (65.4%) patients. The majority of patients previously underwent more common treatments such as endorectal advancement flap or ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. Fat-harvesting sites and processing technique were selected by the plastic surgeons based on availability of trunk fat deposits. When analyzing patients by their last procedure, 41 (80.4%) experienced symptom improvement, and 29 (64.4%) experienced clinical closure of all fistula tracts. Recurrence rate was 40.4%, and complication rate was 15.4% (7 postoperative abscesses requiring I&D and 1 bleeding episode ligated at bedside). The abdomen was the most common site of lipoaspirate harvest at 63%, but extremities were occasionally used. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes when comparing single graft treatment to multiple treatments, Crohn's and non-Crohn's, different methods of fat preparation, and diversion. CONCLUSION: AFG is a versatile procedure that can be done in conjunction with other therapies and does not interfere with future treatments if recurrence occurs. It is a promising and affordable method to safely address complex fistulas.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Biologic Therapy for Crohn's Disease: A CA-IBD Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared the safety and effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists vs vedolizumab vs ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in a multicenter cohort (CA-IBD). METHODS: We created an electronic health record-based cohort of adult patients with CD who were initiating a new biologic agent (TNF-α antagonists, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) from 5 health systems in California between 2010 and 2017. We compared the risk of serious infections (safety) and all-cause hospitalization and inflammatory bowel disease-related surgery (effectiveness) between different biologic classes using propensity score (PS) matching. RESULTS: As compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 1030), 2:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 515) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64), without any difference in the risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.21) or surgery (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.70). Compared with vedolizumab (n = 221), 1:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.60), without significant differences in risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.07) or surgery (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.54-3.72). Compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 442), 2:1 PS-matched, vedolizumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) had a similar risk of serious infections (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.84-2.78), hospitalization (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98-1.77), and surgery (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27-1.47). High comorbidity burden, concomitant opiate use, and prior hospitalization were associated with serious infections and hospitalization in biologic-treated patients with CD. CONCLUSION: In a multicenter cohort of biologic-treated patients with CD, ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections compared with TNF-α antagonists and vedolizumab, without any differences in risk of hospitalization or surgery. The risk of serious infections was similar for TNF-α antagonists vs vedolizumab.

Effectiveness and Safety of Biologic Therapy in Hispanic Vs Non-Hispanic Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A CA-IBD Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are limited data on outcomes of biologic therapy in Hispanic patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We compared risk of hospitalization, surgery, and serious infections in Hispanic vs non-Hispanic patients with IBD in a multicenter, electronic health record-based cohort of biologic-treated patients. METHODS: We identified adult patients with IBD who were new users of biologic agents (tumor necrosis factor α [TNF-α] antagonists, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) from 5 academic institutions in California between 2010 and 2017. We compared the risk of all-cause hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, and serious infections in Hispanic vs non-Hispanic patients using 1:4 propensity score matching and survival analysis. RESULTS: We compared 240 Hispanic patients (53% male; 45% with ulcerative colitis; 73% TNF-α antagonist-treated; 20% with prior biologic exposure) with 960 non-Hispanic patients (51% male; 44% with ulcerative colitis; 67% TNF-α antagonist-treated; 27% with prior biologic exposure). After propensity score matching, Hispanic patients were younger (37 ± 15 vs 40 ± 16 y; P = .02) and had a higher burden of comorbidities (Elixhauser index, >0; 37% vs 26%; P < .01), without any differences in patterns of medication use, burden of inflammation, and hospitalizations. Within 1 year of biologic initiation, Hispanic patients had higher rates of hospitalizations (31% vs 23%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74) and IBD-related surgery (7.1% vs 4.6%; aHR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.07-3.72), with a trend toward higher risk of serious infections (8.8% vs 4.9%; aHR, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.99-3.05). CONCLUSIONS: In a multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort of biologic-treated patients with IBD, Hispanic patients experienced higher rates of hospitalization, surgery, and serious infections. Future studies are needed to investigate the biological, social, and environmental drivers of these differences.

Gender Related Differences in Surgeon Compensation: Survey Results from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the effect of sex on compensation among colorectal surgeons and to determine which factors contribute to gender-based differences in compensation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The sex-based wage gap in the medical profession is among the most pronounced wage gaps in the U.S. Data regarding the wage gap among colorectal surgeons and the underlying reasons for this disparity remain unclear. METHODS: The Healthcare Economics Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons conducted a survey to evaluate surgeon demographics, compensation, and practice characteristics. To evaluate the effect of sex on compensation, we performed multivariable linear regression with backward selection. We used a two-sided P -value with a significance threshold <0.05. RESULTS: The mean difference in normalized total compensation between men and women was $46,250, and when salary was adjusted for FTEs, the difference was $57,000. Women were more likely to perform anorectal surgery, less likely to perform general surgery and less likely to hold positions in leadership. After adjustments, women reported significantly lower compensation (aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97). Time spent doing abdominal surgery (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.23), professor status (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.32) and instructor status (aOR, 1.49; 95% 1.28-1.73) were independently associated with compensation. CONCLUSIONS: We found a 12% adjusted sex wage gap among colorectal surgeons. Gender-based differences in leadership positions and allocation of effort may contribute. Further research will be necessary to clarify sources of wage inequalities. Still, our results should prompt expedient actions to support closing the gap.

Alvimopan for Enhanced Gastrointestinal Recovery after Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of peritoneal metastases with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is associated with prolonged length of stay and time to return of bowel function. Alvimopan is a peripherally acting opioid antagonist that reduces postoperative ileus. We sought to determine the efficacy of alvimopan on return of bowel function in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-institution, IRB-approved trial was conducted in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC from March 2018 to April 2020. Patients received alvimopan or placebo preoperatively and twice daily postoperatively for 7 days. The primary endpoint (GI-2) was the time of tolerance of solid food and first bowel movement (BM). Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with prolonged ileus, time to first flatus, first BM, tolerance of solid food, discharge, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients met eligibility criteria and received placebo (n = 32) or alvimopan (n = 30), and were included in the analysis. The median time to GI-2 was 152 hours (95% CI 134, 204) in the placebo arm versus 117 hours (95% CI 102, 158) in the alvimopan arm (p = 0.04). The time to BM was 89 hours (95% CI 71, 114) in the placebo arm vs 67 hours (95% CI 62, 89) in the alvimopan arm (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in AE rates, proportion of patients with prolonged ileus, or other secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: Perioperative alvimopan was well tolerated and accelerated bowel function recovery in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Current trends in nonoperative management for rectal adenocarcinoma: An unequal playing field?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Increasing evidence suggests patient-oriented benefits of nonoperative management (NOM) for rectal cancer. However, vigilant surveillance requires excellent access to care. We sought to examine patient, socioeconomic, and facility-level factors associated with NOM over time. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2006-2017), we examined patients with Stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma, who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and received NOM versus surgery. Factors associated with NOM were assessed using multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection. RESULTS: There were 59,196 surgical and 8520 NOM patients identified. NOM use increased from 12.9% to 15.9% between 2006 and 2017. Patients who were Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-1.47), treated at community cancer centers (aOR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.12-1.30), without insurance (aOR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.68-2.09), and with less education (aOR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.42-1.65) exhibited higher odds of NOM. Patients treated at high-volume centers (aOR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.84) and those who traveled >25.6 miles for care (aOR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.55-0.64) had lower odds of NOM. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerable groups who traditionally have difficulty accessing comprehensive cancer care were more likely to receive NOM, suggesting that healthcare disparities may be driving utilization. More research is needed to understand NOM decision-making in rectal cancer treatment.

Factors associated with refusing surgery versus planned nonoperative management for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, patients with rectal cancer receive nonoperative management. A growing body of retrospective evidence supporting the safety of this approach has likely contributed to its growing popularity. However, patients may also undergo nonoperative management because of refusal of surgical resection. We hypothesize that patients who refuse surgery are more likely to be from groups who traditionally face barriers accessing care. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database (2006-2017) to analyze patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent nonoperative management following radiation. We identified 2 groups: (1) planned nonoperative management and (2) nonoperative management because of refusal of surgery. We performed logistic regression to compare the groups along patient, socioeconomic, and facility-level factors. RESULTS: In total, 9,613 and 2,039 patients were included in the planned nonoperative management and refused nonoperative management groups, respectively. Of the total study cohort (ie, planned nonoperative management + refused nonoperative management), 21% of these patients diagnosed in 2017 underwent refused nonoperative management, versus 12% in 2006. Patients who were Black (adjusted odds ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.26-1.71) or Asian/Pacific Islander (adjusted odds ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.92), age ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.37-1.77), with more advanced disease stage (stage III adjusted odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.53), and government insurance (adjusted odds ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.36) were associated with increased utilization of refused nonoperative management. Conversely, lower education (adjusted odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.76) and female sex (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.97) were associated with planned nonoperative management. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the refused nonoperative management group is demographically distinct. Outreach efforts to better understand the rationale behind patient decision making in rectal cancer will be paramount to ensuring appropriate implementation of nonoperative management.

Effect of Obesity on Risk of Hospitalization, Surgery, and Serious Infection in Biologic-Treated Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A CA-IBD Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is variably associated with treatment response in biologic-treated patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We evaluated the association between obesity and risk of hospitalization, surgery, or serious infections in patients with IBD in new users of biologic agents in a large, multicenter, electronic health record (EHR)-based cohort (CA-IBD). METHODS: We created an EHR-based cohort of adult patients with IBD who were new users of biologic agents (tumor necrosis factor [TNF-α] antagonists, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab) between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2017, from 5 health systems in California. Patients were classified as those with normal body mass index (BMI), overweight, or obese based on the World Health Organization classification. We compared the risk of all-cause hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, or serious infections among patients with obesity vs those overweight vs those with normal BMI, using Cox proportional hazard analyses, adjusting for baseline demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: Of 3,038 biologic-treated patients with IBD (69% with Crohn's disease and 76% on TNF-α antagonists), 28.2% (n = 858) were overweight, and 13.7% (n = 416) were obese. On a follow-up after biologic initiation, obesity was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] vs normal BMI, 0.90; [95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.13]); IBD-related surgery (aHR, 0.62 [0.31-1.22]); or serious infection (aHR, 1.11 [0.73-1.71]). Similar results were observed on stratified analysis by disease phenotype (Crohn's disease vs ulcerative colitis) and index biologic therapy (TNF-α antagonists vs non-TNF-α antagonists). DISCUSSION: In a multicenter, EHR-based cohort of biologic-treated patients with IBD, obesity was not associated with hospitalization, surgery, or serious infections. Further studies examining the effect of visceral obesity on patient-reported and endoscopic outcomes are needed.

A Novel System to Improve Case Capture for Surgery Morbidity and Mortality Conference.

INTRODUCTION: Complications are often under-reported at surgical morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences due to the sole reliance on voluntary case submission. While most institutions have databases used for targeted initiatives in quality improvement, these are not routinely used for M&M. We aimed to increase case capture for M&M conferences by developing a novel system that augments the existing case submission system with cases representing complications from quality improvement databases and the electronic health record (EHR). METHODS: We developed and implemented a novel system for increasing the capture rate of complications for M&M conferences by developing custom software that combines data from the following sources: an existing voluntary case submission system for M&M, local quality databases-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Vizient, and an EHR-based case capture tool. We evaluated this system on a retrospective cohort of all postoperative complications at a single center in a 32-mo period and in a prospective cohort over a 4-mo period after system implementation. RESULTS: In the retrospective cohort, we identified 433 complications among all data sources. Inclusion of the new system introduced 280 new potential cases for M&M review over the 32-mo period. After implementation, the system provided 31% of cases presented at M&M conference that would have otherwise been omitted. CONCLUSIONS: A novel system that includes complications identified in the EHR and quality improvement databases increased the case capture volume for surgical M&M conference, which provides an objective case referral system that can identify complementary quality improvement opportunities.

Robotic left-stapled total intracorporeal bowel anastomosis versus stapled partial extracorporeal anastomosis: operative technical description and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although there is extensive literature on robotic total intracorporeal anastomosis (TICA) for right colon resection, left total ICA using the da Vinci Xi robotic platform has only been described in short case series previously. In this study, we report on the largest cohort of robotic left total ICA, provide a description of our institution's techniques, and compare outcomes to robotic left partial extracorporeal anastomosis (PECA). METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic left colectomy for any underlying pathology from July 1, 2016 through April 30, 2020 were identified by procedure code. A technical description is provided for two unique techniques performed at our institution. Outcomes included operative time, length of stay, supply cost, post-operative ileus, post-operative morbidity and mortality and need for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure. RESULTS: From a review of our institution's data, 83 robotic TICA cases were identified and 76 robotic PECA cases were identified. Common procedures included low anterior resection, sigmoidectomy, left hemicolectomy, and rectopexy with resection. TICA was associated with significantly shorter intraoperative time compared to PECA. CONCLUSIONS: Our series shows that TICA is a safe and feasible technique that does not increase the risk of adverse outcomes. Using either the anvil-forward or anvil-backward technique, we were able to reliably reproduce this method in a total of 83 patients undergoing left colon resection for either benign or malignant diseases.

Cost Effectiveness of Watch and Wait Versus Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients with Complete Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

BACKGROUND: Watch and wait (WW) protocols have gained increasing popularity for patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer and presumed complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. While studies have demonstrated comparable survival and recurrence rates between WW and radical surgery, the decision to undergo surgery has significant effects on patient quality of life. We sought to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing WW with abdominoperineal resection (APR) and low anterior resection (LAR) among patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. METHODS: In this comparative-effectiveness study, we built Markov microsimulation models to simulate disease progression, death, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for WW or APR/LAR. We assessed cost effectiveness using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with ICERs under $100,000/QALY considered cost effective. Probabilities of disease progression, death, and health utilities were extracted from published, peer-reviewed literature. We assessed costs from the payer perspective. RESULTS: WW dominated both LAR and APR at a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000. Our model was most sensitive to rates of distant recurrence and regrowth after WW. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that WW was the dominant strategy over both APR and LAR over 100% of iterations across a range of WTP thresholds from $0-250,000. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests WW could reduce overall costs and increase effectiveness compared with either LAR or APR. Additional clinical research is needed to confirm the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of WW compared with surgery in rectal cancer.

Experience with 10 years of a robotic surgery program at an Academic Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined robotic surgery from a programmatic standpoint, yet this is how hospitals evaluate return on investment clinically and fiscally. This study examines the 10-year experience of a robotic program at a single academic institution. STUDY DESIGN: All robotic operations performed at our institution from August 2005 to December 2016 were reviewed. Data were collected from the robotic system and hospital databases. RESULTS: A total of 3485 robotic operations were performed. Yearly case volume nearly quadrupled. There have been 37 robotic-trained surgeons in 5 specialties performing 53 different operations. Rate of conversion to open was 4.2%. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class increased over time, with ASA class 3 increasing from 20% of patients to 45% of patients. Average case time in 2005 was 453 min, but decreased by 46% to 246 min by 2007, then remained relatively stable (range 226-247). Operating efficiency improved, with room time and case time decreasing by 9% in the past 4 years. Average cost for robotic supplies was $1519 per case. Additional costs per case related to equipment and contracts totaled an average of $11,822. Average length of stay (LOS) for robotic cases was 3.3 days, compared to 3.0 days for laparoscopic and 7.0 for open. Cost per day for admission after robotic surgery was 1.7 times greater than the cost of open or laparoscopic surgery. Total admission costs of robotic operations were 1.5 times those of laparoscopic surgery, but less than open operations. Readmissions following robotic cases were lower than open (15% v 26%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 10 years, the use of robotic technology has grown significantly at our institution, with good fiscal and clinical outcomes. Operating room costs are high; however, efficiency has improved, LOS is shorter, admission costs are lower than open operations, and readmission rates are lower.

The Role of Biomarkers in Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: A Review.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory condition that generally affects the rectum and extends proximally into the colon in a continuous, distal-to-proximal pattern. Surgical resection (total proctocolectomy) is the only cure for UC and is often necessary in managing complicated or refractory disease. However, recent advances in biologically targeted therapies have resulted in improved disease control, and surgery is required in only a fraction of cases. This ever-increasing array of options for medical management has added complexity to surgical decision-making. In some circumstances, the added time required to ensure failure of medical therapy can delay colectomy in patients who will ultimately need it. Indeed, many patients with severe disease undergo trials of multiple medical therapies prior to considering surgery. In severe cases of UC, continued medical management has been associated with a delay to surgical intervention and higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Biomarkers represent a burgeoning field of research, particularly in inflammatory bowel disease and cancer. This review seeks to highlight the different possible settings for surgery in UC and the role various biomarkers might play in each.

Outcomes for a Large Cohort of Patients with Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: an Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors comprise 20% of neuroendocrine tumors in the alimentary tract, but there is controversy surrounding the optimal management of this disease. The purpose of this study is to better define treatment for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors between 2004 and 2015. Patients with metastatic disease and missing treatment data were excluded. We examined overall survival stratified by tumor size, treatment type, and presence of positive lymph nodes using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression model was performed to identify factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 17,448 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors were identified; 16,531 of these patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients had tumors ≤ 10 mm (9216 patients, 79.8%), and approximately 90% underwent local excision. The probability of 5-year overall survival was significantly higher for patients with smaller tumors (≤ 10 mm: 94.1% 11-20 mm: 85.7%, > 20 mm: 71.8%; p < 0.001) and those with no positive lymph nodes (91.4% versus 53.3%, p < 0.001). The probability of 5-year overall survival differed based on treatment modality (local excision: 93.6%, radical resection: 79.1%, observation alone: 77.1%; p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, when compared to local excision, radical resection was not associated with a difference in overall survival but observation alone was associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 2.750, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference in overall survival between patients who underwent local excision versus observation alone. Excision of the tumor should be offered to all patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who are appropriate surgical candidates, regardless of the tumor size.