Intrinsic graft laxity variation with open kinetic chain exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A non-randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether quadriceps and hamstring strengthening in a rehabilitation program involving early open kinetic chain (OKC) and/or closed kinetic chain (CKC) knee joint exercises had an influence on graft laxity at 1, 3, and 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Two groups (n = 53) of ACLR patients (combination of OKC and CKC exercises group compared to a CKC exercise group) were recruited. OKC protocol was introduced at 2 weeks post-operatively without external resistance and progressed at 4 weeks with load. Comparative ACL graft laxity measurement and isokinetic strength testing were prospectively performed up to 6 months in both groups. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the knee laxity at 1 (p = 0.263), 3 (p = 0.263), and 6 months (p = 0.256) follow up between the groups. Similarly, no significant results were observed in within-group knee laxity between 1 and 6 months after ACLR in the intervention (p = 0.155) and control group (p = 0.690). CONCLUSION: The early initiation of OKC along with CKC exercises doesn't seem to increase the ACLR graft laxity as compared to a rehabilitation program with only CKC exercises.

Evaluation of Muscle Strength and Graft Laxity With Early Open Kinetic Chain Exercise After ACL Reconstruction: A Cohort Study.

Background: Open kinetic chain (OKC) exercise is an effective method to improve muscle function during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, there is controversy about its use in the early phase of rehabilitation. Purpose: To determine (1) whether the use of OKC and closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises improves quadriceps and hamstring strength in the early phase of rehabilitation after ACLR and (2) whether the early use of OKC exercise affects graft laxity at 3 and 6 months postoperatively in patients with a hamstring tendon graft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included an intervention group that underwent OKC + CKC exercises (n = 51) and a control group that underwent CKC exercise only (n = 52). In the intervention group, OKC exercise for the quadriceps and hamstring was started at 4 weeks after ACLR. At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, isokinetic testing was performed to calculate the limb symmetry index (LSI) and the peak torque to body weight ratio (PT/BW) for the quadriceps and hamstring. Anterior knee laxity was measured by an arthrometer. Results: At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, quadriceps strength was higher in the intervention group than in the control group for the LSI (3 months: 76.14% ± 0.22% vs 46.91% ± 0.21%, respectively; 6 months: 91.05% ± 0.18% vs 61.80% ± 0.26%, respectively; P < .001 for both) and PT/BW (3 months: 1.81 ± 0.75 vs 0.85 ± 0.50 N·m/kg, respectively; 6 months: 2.40 ± 0.73 vs 1.39 ± 0.70 N·m/kg, respectively; P < .001 for both). There were similar findings regarding hamstring strength for the LSI (3 months: 86.13% ± 0.22% vs 64.26% ± 0.26%, respectively; 6 months: 91.90% ± 0.17% vs 82.42% ± 0.24%, respectively; P < .001 at three months, P = .024 at 6 months) and PT/BW (3 months: 1.09 ± 0.36 vs 0.67 ± 0.39 N·m/kg, respectively; 6 months: 1.42 ± 0.41 vs 1.07 ± 0.39 N·m/kg, respectively; P < .001 for both). No significant difference in laxity was observed between the intervention and control groups at 3 or 6 months. Conclusion: Early use of OKC exercise for both the quadriceps and the hamstring, in addition to conventional CKC exercise, resulted in better correction of quadriceps and hamstring strength deficits without increasing graft laxity.

Is there any biomechanical justification to use hopping as a return to running test? A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement and the correlation between asymmetry indexes of leg stiffness (AI(Kleg)) in running and hopping and the correlation between leg stiffness (Kleg) in running and hopping. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinical facility. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve healthy runners (5 women and 7 men; mean (SD) age = 36.6 (10.1) years; activity level = 6.4 (0.9) on Tegner scale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A treadmill instrumented by photoelectric cells was used to collect data (flight and contact times) during running assessment (preferential and imposed velocity (3.33 m s-1) and during a hopping test. Kleg and AI(Kleg) were computed for each modality. Correlation tests were performed, and Bland Altman's plot was created. RESULTS: A significant and large correlation was found between Kleg in hopping and running at imposed speed (r = 0.6, p = 0.001). An acceptable agreement was found between the AIs in hopping and running, with a bias of 0.04 (-0.15-0.06) at imposed speed and 0.03 (-0.13-0.07) at preferred speed. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that testing an athlete for asymmetry in hopping might help to understand what happens in running. For this purpose, further research is needed, especially in an injured population, to better understand the association between biomechanical asymmetry in hopping and running.

Evolution of Functional Recovery using Hop Test Assessment after ACL Reconstruction.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate improvements in functional performance through the use of the Limb Symmetry Index of Single and Triple Hop tests between 12 and 52 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and to compare these values with usual time-based and performance-based criteria used during the return to sport continuum. Repeated functional assessments using Single and Triple Hop Tests at 12, 16, 22, 26, 39 and 52 postoperative weeks were evaluated. At each session, the median and interquartile range of Limb Symmetry Index of tests were calculated and compared with the usual criteria: return to participation:≥85%, between 12-16 w; return to play:≥90%, between 26-39 w. The results indicate that the median increased over time to 39 postoperative weeks and then stabilized. For Single Hop Test, wide variability was seen at 12 and 16 weeks (interquartile range=20%); this was lower from 22 to 52 weeks (interquartile range=8-6%). At 12 weeks for Single Hop Test, the median was 83.6% and did not meet>85% criteria for return to participation. Hop tests could be interesting functional tests to follow the functional recovery and help decision-making regarding return to participation and return to play.

Criteria for return to running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the criteria used to guide clinical decision-making regarding when a patient is ready to return to running (RTR) after ACL reconstruction. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, PEDro, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane Library electronic databases. We also screened the reference lists of included studies and conducted forward citation tracking. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Reported at least one criterion for permitting adult patients with primary ACL reconstruction to commence running postoperatively. RESULTS: 201 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and reported 205 time-based criteria for RTR. The median time from when RTR was permitted was 12 postoperative weeks (IQR=3.3, range 5-39 weeks). Fewer than one in five studies used additional clinical, strength or performance-based criteria for decision-making regarding RTR. Aside from time, the most frequently reported criteria for RTR were: full knee range of motion or >95% of the non-injured knee plus no pain or pain <2 on visual analogue scale; isometric extensor limb symmetry index (LSI)>70% plus extensor and flexor LSI>70%; and hop test LSI>70%. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than one in five studies reported clinical, strength or performance-based criteria for RTR even though best evidence recommends performance-based criteria combined with time-based criteria to commence running activities following ACL reconstruction.

Criteria for Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with lower reinjury risk (CR'STAL study): protocol for a prospective observational study in France.

INTRODUCTION: The decision regarding when to return to sport after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is an important one. Using a variety of subjective and objective parameters, various attempts have been made to determine an optimal timeline for a return to sport after ACLR, but none have been validated.The aim of the present study is therefore to determine which criteria or combination of criteria could allow to return to sport with the lowest possible risk of reinjury. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a prospective cohort, single-centre study, with repeated assessments at 6, 9 and 12 months post-ACL surgical reconstruction and including a 3-year follow-up of patients' sporting activity and reinjuries. 275 patients will be included to test explanatory variables. Postural control analysis, knee laxity, questionnaires (International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Reinjury (ACL-RSI) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)), modified Star Excursion Balance Test, running and sprinting biomechanics, Hop Tests and Isokinetic Tests will all be used. The primary outcome will be any reinjury during the follow-up period, defined as a graft rupture, a contralateral ACL rupture or any injury necessitating an interruption of training and requiring a medical consultation. Two groups will be constituted during the follow-up, separating reinjured from non-reinjured patients. In addition, classic analysis and data mining approaches will be used to build predictive models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations. Ethical approval was obtained through the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne (reference number IRBN522015/CHUSTE).