[A trick to improve the technique of the IntraVascular Stent (IVaS): "Clip Stent"]. / Une astuce pour améliorer la technique du stent intravasculaire (IVaS) : le "Clip Stent".

The infra-millimetre vessels are difficult to suture, because the placement of forceps in the lumen is delicate and threads often cross the walls. The technique of the IntraVascular Stent (IVaS), developed to remedy it, did not make the proof of its superiority. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of a variant, the Clip Stent. Our series included two groups of 10 rats. In group I, the artery of the tail was anastomosed by threads of nylon 10/0. In group II, the artery was anastomosed according to the technique of Clip Stent including three stages: introduction of a monothread of polypropylene 6/0, anastomosis by threads of nylon 10/0, ablation of the Clip Stent and the closure of possible leaks. The assessment consisted in measuring the time of anastomosis, in counting the number of separate threads and leaks, and in testing the permeability. The time of anastomosis was longer 12 minutes in the group II. The number of points by anastomosis was 6.5 in the group I and of 5.5 in the group II. The permeability was 90% in two groups. The Clip Stent is faster than the IVaS. It is useless to realize vascular threads of the lumen before the introduction of the stent. Once the stent in position, it cannot traumatize the intima and its migration is impossible. Contrary to the IVaS, the Clip Stent allows to realize the last threads stent in position, by releasing the tourniquet. The ablation is safe. Its superiority to the conventional methods remains to demonstrate by improving its introduction in the lumen.

Fifth metacarpal neck fracture fixation: Locking plate versus K-wire?

INTRODUCTION: Neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone can leave sequelae. Surgery is indicated when the displacement of the head in flexion exceeds 45° and/or rotation is impaired. Among available techniques, non-locking mini-plates have the most drawbacks; recently developed locking plates may, however, challenge the preference for K-wires. HYPOTHESIS: The present study compared results between locking plates and intramedullary K-wires. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The series comprised 38 fifth metacarpal fractures: 18 were managed by locking plate (group I) and 20 by intramedullary K-wire (group II). Results were analyzed on subjective and objective criteria (pain, DASH, strength, mobility, time off work, radiology). RESULTS: No significant differences were found for pain, DASH, strength, time off work or head displacement at last follow-up. Active mobility, however, was significantly greater in the K-wire group, with mean relative metacarpophalangeal flexion 59% of healthy-side values in group I vs. 98% in group II, and mean relative extension 89% in group I vs. 99% in group II. Group I showed six complications (three cases of stiffness, one of head necrosis, two of delayed consolidation) vs. seven in group II (three cases of wire migration, three of neurologic lesion, one of esthetic blemish). DISCUSSION: Locking plates with immediate mobilization paradoxically provided poorer mobility at end of follow-up than intramedullary K-wire with 6 weeks' immobilization. The extra cost of locking plates was thus not justified by results. Intramedullary K-wire nailing remains the reference technique for the management of displaced fracture of the fifth metacarpal neck. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV continuous prospective comparative study.