Association of the Hydronephrosis Severity Score With Likelihood of Pyeloplasty: A Large Prospective Database Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To apply and reproduce this scoring system in our prenatal hydronephrosis population with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)-like hydronephrosis (HN), specifically looking at determining better HHS cutoffs that would allow for stratification into three risk categories: spontaneous HN resolution, observation, and surgery. METHODS: A prospectively collected prenatal hydronephrosis database was reviewed to extract UPJO-like HN patients. Children with vesicoureteral reflux, primary megaureter, bilateral HN, and other associated anomalies were excluded. Only patients who had an ultrasound and mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan at a minimum of 2-time points were included. Hydronephrosis Severity Score was calculated at the initial, interim, and last follow-up clinic visits. Scores were analyzed regarding its usefulness to determine which patients would have been more likely to undergo pyeloplasty. RESULTS: Of 167 patients, 131 (78%) were male, 119 (71%) had left UPJO-like, and 113 (67%) had a pyeloplasty. The median age at baseline was 2months (interquartile range 1-4). According to initial (first clinic visit) Hydronephrosis Severity Score, 5/36 (14%) patients with a 0-4 score, 93/116 (80%) with a 5-8 score, and 15/15 (100%) with a 9-12 score underwent pyeloplasty, respectively (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The proposed HHS system for UPJO-like HN patients is reproducible, however, cut-off values need to be reassessed to accurately reflect true risk categories, as the purpose of this system is to differentiate those who have HN severe enough to require intervention from those who can be managed nonsurgically. Changing risk groups to mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-12) allowed for better discrimination between patients who underwent surgical intervention from those who did not in our dataset.

"Inverted" positioning of renal allograft during kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: A single-institution comparative analysis.

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice in children with end-stage renal failure. Limitations in patient anatomy or a short donor renal vein may necessitate intraoperative inversion of the kidney. There is little evidence to support the use of this surgical technique, and no evidence in the pediatric population. This study identifies the perioperative and post-operative outcomes of inverted renal transplants in pediatric patients. We reviewed all patients having a renal transplant between January 2012 and December 2016 and collected short- and long-term outcomes of patients who received an inverted allograft. Early graft function was defined as the time to reach creatinine nadir. During this time, our hospital performed 81 transplants, and 50 (62%) were from deceased donors, including the 6 (12%) patients who received inverted renal grafts. Half (3/6) were female, 5/6 (83%) were dialysis-dependent, and the median age at surgery was 13 years (range 9-16 years). There was no significant difference in mean creatinine nadir values (P = 0.518) and the time to creatinine nadir mean values (P = 0.190) between the upright and inverted renal transplant groups. There were also no significant differences in rates of post-operative complications between the upright and inverted allograft recipients. Inversion of renal allografts in pediatric patients is a viable surgical technique to compensate for shortcomings in patient anatomy or in special cases of renal transplantation involving a short donor renal vein. Future research should focus on outcomes of a larger group of pediatric inverted renal transplant patients.

Intraoperative management and early postoperative outcomes of pediatric renal transplants.

INTRODUCTION: Smaller children are presenting for renal transplantation as the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Adult donor organs are more successful than pediatric deceased donor organs. An adult kidney may sequester ~75% of the circulating volume of a 5 year-old child and requires significantly increased cardiac output to maintain renal perfusion. Treatment includes volume, inotropic or vasopressor agents, or central neuroaxial blockade for sympatholysis. We describe the perioperative anesthestic management as a guide to clinical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of renal transplant patients between 2006 and 2014 was performed. We recorded patient demographics, surgical and anesthetic factors and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-six children underwent renal transplantation, of which 38% were from living donors. There were 99/156 (63.5%) males. Median age was 10 years (range 1-17 years) and the mean weight was 36.2 kg (sd 20.6 kg; range 7.6-109.6 kg). There were 36 children ≤5 years of age and 14 children ≤2 years of age. One hundred and nineteen (77%) were dialysis dependent. Pharmacological support to increase renal perfusion included mannitol in 95%, and dopamine in 83%. Furosemide was used in 82% of cases. Inotropic therapy continued into the postoperative period in 34%. Radiological pulmonary edema was diagnosed in 33% and clinical pulmonary edema in 7%. Intraoperative use of dopamine delayed the time to creatinine nadir in all grafts (9.5 days vs 6.5 days, P = 0.04) and in deceased donor grafts (12.9 vs 7.4 days, P = 0.007). Patients who received dopamine had no significant difference in central venous pressure (CVP) preclamp removal, 14 mmHg vs 11.5 mmHg (P = 0.12) but a higher CVP after clamp removal, 14.3 mmHg vs 11.8 mmHg (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Dopamine use was common and was an independent risk factor for delayed time to creatinine nadir. Many different agents were used to enhance renal perfusion. The 'supra-physiological' hemodynamics resulted in pulmonary edema in 33% of patients.