Endovascular Inferior Vena Cava Filters Placed in Duplicated Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome.

Duplicated inferior vena cava (D-IVC) is a relatively rare anatomical anomaly. Clinically, these anomalies are incidentally found on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Lack of pre-operative identification of this congenital malformation can lead to incomplete protection against thromboembolism or hemorrhage. We present a case of a 71-year-old male with a duplicated inferior vena cava who underwent insertion of bilateral inferior vena cava filters for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) management.

The benefit of negative pressure dressings in vascular surgery patients with infrainguinal incisions.

OBJECTIVE: Within the vascular patient population, there is an increased risk of developing wound complications especially in infrainguinal incisions. There has been increasing interest in using closed incisional negative pressure dressings to decrease the risk of wound complications. To assess the efficacy of these incisional wound dressings, we studied surgical site infections (SSI) and seroma rates of infrainguinal incisions in our vascular patient population. METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study from July 2015 to June 2019. In 2017, our institution began using the Prevena incisional wound system. Wound complication rates were compared with the non-Prevena group before 2017. There were a total of 100 infrainguinal incisions (left and right combined) that received the Prevena wound system and 138 infrainguinal incisions that had not. The primary end point was to assess for wound complication rates, including SSIs and seroma formation. SSIs were graded based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Plan SSI criteria. Seroma formation was diagnosed based on clinical diagnosis, imaging studies (ultrasound examination, computed tomography scan) or needle aspiration of fluid collection. RESULTS: This analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in the rate of SSIs in the Prevena group when compared with the non-Prevena group (P = .012). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the rate of seroma formation (P = .155). Of the 100 incisions that received the Prevena wound system, 1.2% (1/82) had a femoral SSI and 22.0% (4/18) had a popliteal SSI. For seroma formation, 24.4% (20/82) had a femoral seroma and 11.1% (2/18) had a popliteal seroma. Of the 138 incisions that did not have the Prevena wound system, 9.6% (10/104) had a femoral SSI and 8.8% (3/34) had a popliteal SSI. For seroma formation, 24.0% (25/104) had a femoral seroma and 8.8% (3/34) had a popliteal seroma. Comorbid conditions were assessed in the two study groups and there was no statistical significance regarding rates of SSIs between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an incisional negative pressure dressing decreases the rate of SSIs in infrainguinal incisions. Regarding the use of these wound systems for seromas, our study did not show a statistically significant decrease in seroma rates.