Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AANA J ; 92(3): 181-187, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38758712

ABSTRACT

Approximately 6.5 million people in the U.S. are affected by an intellectual or developmental disability (IDD). However, their healthcare needs often remain unmet due to the inadequate education and training of healthcare professionals. Given that various procedures may require anesthesia in as many as 40% of individuals with IDD, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Programs need to incorporate IDD training into their curriculum. A cross-sectional survey using a 12-item questionnaire was conducted to assess IDD training. Statistical analyses included the chi-square test and participant demographics were reported as frequencies or percentages. Numerical data were presented as means and standard deviations. A total of 277 respondents completed the survey and most reported (55%) a lack of IDD training at nurse anesthesia programs and 90% recognized the need for additional training. Only 24% felt competent in providing care for patients with IDD, while 52% reported feeling somewhat or very competent. A significant correlation was found between the number of clinical anesthesia experiences and self-rated competence (P < 0.001). Incorporating IDD training into the nurse anesthesia curriculum is critical to preparing competent graduates capable of serving this diverse population. Nurse anesthesia programs should evaluate their curriculum to effectively address this healthcare inequality.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Intellectual Disability , Nurse Anesthetists , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nurse Anesthetists/education , Male , Female , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Intellectual Disability/nursing , Developmental Disabilities/nursing , Curriculum , United States
2.
AANA J ; 86(5): 348-360, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31584404

ABSTRACT

Lowering the dose of the local anesthesia significantly reduces the risks of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in an elective cesarean delivery. Determination of the mean effective dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine will aid clinicians in managing maternal hypotension. The systematic search of studies evaluating the mean effective dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine yielded 10 clinical trials reporting the minimum effective dose in 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of patients. The up-down method and the random allocation design were the dose-finding strategies used in all trials included in the review. The calculated ED50 and ED95 of bupivacaine varied according to different patient subgroups. The estimated ED50 of hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without opioid ranged from 4.7 mg to 9.8 mg. The calculated ED95 ranged from 8.8 mg to 15 mg. Doses at the level of ED50 minimized spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension yet increased intraoperative pain supplementation, whereas doses at the level of ED95 provided adequate surgical anesthesia with increased risk of maternal hypotension. Furthermore, the addition of intrathecal administration of opioids reduced local anesthetic doses. In the clinical setting, low-dose spinal anesthesia should be used only in combination with the combined spinal-epidural technique.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Cesarean Section , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Nurse Anesthetists , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL