Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging to Identify and Preserve the Fifth Anterior Intercostal Sensory Nerves during Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty.

Postoperative sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is an important concern for women after reduction mammoplasty. Previous studies have demonstrated that sensory branches of the fifth anterior intercostal nerve are important for innervating the NAC and that using an inferior pedicle technique is associated with improved sensory retention. The significance of this case report is that it demonstrates the importance of the fifth anterior intercostal sensory nerve branches using a prototype fluorescent imaging camera. The benefit of this device is that it can detect intraoperative auto-fluorescence of nerves and facilitate their identification and preservation, potentially facilitating the retention of sensation in the NAC and surrounding skin. The goals of this article are, therefore, to demonstrate the importance of this neurovascular pedicle when the inferior pedicle technique is used for breast reduction; and to provide demonstrative evidence of the nerve's presence within the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator pedicle. The case involved a woman with mammary hypertrophy who underwent bilateral reduction mammoplasty using the inferior pedicle technique. Full NAC sensation was demonstrated on postoperative day 3 with complete sensory recovery at 1- and 3-month follow-up confirmed. To our knowledge, this is the first reported instance of the fifth intercostal nerve being visualized during aesthetic breast surgery, demonstrating the importance of this neurovascular bundle for sensory preservation when an inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty technique is used.

Indocyanine green fluorescence versus blue dye, technetium-99M, and the dual-marker combination of technetium-99M + blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early breast cancer-meta-analysis including consistency analysis.

BACKGROUND: Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsies are standard of care in patients with breast cancer and no clinically apparent metastases. Traditionally, technetium-99m, blue dye, or both have been used to identify sentinel lymph nodes. However, blue dyes miss up to 40% of sentinel lymph nodes, while technetium-99m use is complex, costly, and exposes patients to radiation. Over the past decade, studies have consistently found the biologically inert fluorescent indocyanine green to be 95% to 100% sensitive in detecting breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes, yet indocyanine green remains infrequently used. METHODS: We conducted an extensive meta-analysis comparing indocyanine green against blue dye, technetium-99m, and the dual-marker combination of technetium-99m + BD. Unlike prior meta-analyses that only assessed either per-case or per-node sentinel lymph node detection, we analyzed the following 5 metrics: per-case and per-node sentinel lymph node detection and metastasis-positive sentinel lymph node sensitivity, and mean number of sentinel lymph nodes/case. We further examined the consistency and magnitude of between-study superiority and statistically significant within-study superiority of each marker against others. RESULTS: For every metric and analysis approach, indocyanine green was clearly superior to blue dye and at least non-inferior, if not superior, to technetium-99m and technetium-99m + blue dye. Assessing the consistency of superiority by at least 2.0%, indocyanine green was superior to blue dye 73 times versus 1, to technetium-99m 42 times versus 9, and to technetium-99m + blue dye 6 times versus 0. Within-study statistically significant differences favored indocyanine green over blue dye 29 times versus 0 and over technetium-99m 11 times versus 2. DISCUSSION: For sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer with no clinically apparent metastases, indocyanine green is clearly and consistently superior to blue dye and either non-inferior or superior to technetium-99m and technetium-99m + blue dye.

The Anatomy of the Frontalis Muscle Revisited: A Detailed Anatomic, Clinical, and Physiologic Study.

BACKGROUND: There are differing opinions with regard to the specific mechanical forces related to contraction of the frontalis muscle and how it exerts its effects on eyebrow motion. OBJECTIVES: To perform a detailed anatomic and clinical study of the frontalis muscle in cadavers and patients to better define the movement of the frontalis muscle. METHODS: This study consisted of four arms that included: 1) dynamic ecography to evaluate movement of the frontalis muscle, 2) anatomical study of the relationship between the frontalis muscle and the deep fascia, 3) histological study to define the frontalis muscle attachments and 4) clinical study to evaluate the action of the frontalis muscle in patients undergoing a temporal face lift. RESULTS: The frontalis muscle was attached, inserted, and adhered to the deep layer of the fascia in the superior cephalic and middle third of the forehead. In the superior cephalic third of the forehead, loose areolar tissue was observed deep to the frontalis muscle and the deep layer of the fascia. Within the middle third of the forehead, the deep layer of the galea was fused with the periosteum and firmly adhered. In the inferior caudal third of the forehead, the frontalis muscle was separated from the deep galeal aponeurosis and interdigitated with the orbicularis muscle. When the frontal muscle end was dissected free from the deep fascia by approximately 1 cm and pulled upward, no movement of the eyebrows was observed. Eyebrow elevation was only achieved by pulling on the inferior part of the muscle. CONCLUSIONS: Frontalis muscle movement occurs from the inferior caudal end towards the mid part of the muscle as it contracts centripetally on its superficial layer sliding over the deep part strongly attached to the deep fascia.

Sensory Evaluation of the Nipple-Areolar Complex Following Primary Breast Augmentation: A Comparison of Incision Approaches.

BACKGROUND: The central inframammary incisional approach for breast augmentation surgery disrupts the fifth anterior intercostal nerve-artery-vein-plexus. The authors hypothesized that preservation of the fifth anterior intercostal neurovascular pedicle might completely preserve nipple-areola complex (NAC) sensitivity after implant breast augmentation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze if the use of a laterally displaced incision achieves better sensitivity results than the conventional median submammary incision in females who underwent primary breast augmentation surgery. METHODS: A group of 25 female patients (50 breasts) underwent a surgical protocol for primary prepectoral implant breast augmentation with a laterally displaced submammary incision. This group was compared to a similar group of 25 patients (50 breasts) who underwent breast augmentation through a conventional submammary central approach. Sensitivity testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments was performed in both groups preoperatively and on postoperative days 2, 14, and 30, and after 6 months. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in age, BMI, comorbidities, and implant volumes. Preoperatively, all patients reported normal sensory function in both breasts. Postoperatively, in the laterally displaced incision group, sensory function remained normal in NAC areas, whereas in the conventional incision group, all cases presented the same degree of sensitivity diminution at Days 2, 14, and 30 (P = .000). At 6 months, all values were the same as at Day 30. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the fifth AIC pedicle resulted in complete preservation of preoperative NAC sensitivity. The laterally placed inframammary incision should be considered for patients undergoing primary prepectoral implant breast augmentation.

Fluorescence Imaging to Identify and Preserve Fifth Intercostal Sensory Nerves during Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomies.

The use of nipple-sparing mastectomies has increased steadily over the past 10-15 years. However, one major source of patient dissatisfaction with both skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies is lost skin and/or nipple sensation postoperatively due to intraoperative, iatrogenic sensory nerve injury. We summarize the case of a 41-year-old woman with BRCA(+) breast cancer who underwent bilateral, risk-reducing nipple-sparing mastectomies, immediately followed by bilateral, direct-to-implant breast reconstruction, in whom a prototype fluorescent imaging camera was used to facilitate sensory nerve identification and preservation. Preoperatively, tactile and thermal quantitative sensory testing were performed using a 30-gauge needle to determine baseline sensory function over both breasts. Then, nipple-sparing mastectomies and direct-to-implant reconstruction were performed. Using a laterally-displaced submammary approach, the anterior intercostal artery perforator neurovascular pedicle was preserved. Then a prototype camera, which emits near-ultraviolet light, was used to detect nerve autofluorescence. Intraoperatively under near-ultraviolet light, both the fifth intercostal nerve and its sensory branches auto-fluoresced clearly, so that surgery was completed without apparent injury to the fifth intercostal nerve or any of its branches. Postoperatively, the patient reported full sensory function throughout both breasts and both nipple-areolar complexes, which was confirmed on both tactile and thermal sensory testing at 3-month follow-up. The patient experienced no complications and rated her overall satisfaction with surgery on both breasts as 10 out of 10. To our knowledge, this is the first time sensory nerve auto-fluorescence has been reported to reduce the likelihood of intraoperative, iatrogenic nerve injury and preserve sensory function.

The reverse LICAP flap: A laterally based submammary perforator flap for breast reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: The traditional donor sites for autologous breast reconstruction include the abdomen, thigh, buttock, and posterior thorax. Herein, we describe the use of the reverse lateral intercostal perforator (LICAP) flap originating from the submammary region as an option for breast reconstruction. METHODS: Fifteen patients (30 breasts) were included in this retrospective review. The procedure was performed for immediate reconstruction following a nipple sparing mastectomy utilizing an inframammary incision or an inverted T pattern with preservation of the fifth anterior intercostal perforator (n = 8), volume replacement after implant explantation (n = 5), and partial lower pole resurfacing with exteriorization of a portion of the LICAP skin paddle (n = 2). RESULTS: Flap survival was achieved in all patients. Three flaps (10%) had 1-2 cm of intraoperative distal tip ischemia, which was managed by excision prior to inset and closure. At the 12-month postoperative follow-up, stable results with good nipple position, breast shape, and projection were achieved in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The reverse LICAP flap is a safe, effective, and reliable option for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.

Perforator-Based Cross-Midline Flaps of the Trunk: A Paradigm Shift in Flap Design.

BACKGROUND: The traditional design for truncal perforator flaps is ipsilateral without midline decussation. The presumed rationale is to minimize the risk of distal flap necrosis. In this article, the authors present their experience and results with contralateral truncal perforator flaps designed and raised crossing the midline. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 43 patients (25 men and 18 women) who underwent reconstructive surgery from 1984 to 2021 using a contralateral flap design crossing the midline in the anterior trunk and upper back. Considerations included pathology, location, and the dimensions of the defect and flap. Arithmetic and weighted means with their 95% confidence intervals were estimated to compare ipsilateral and contralateral techniques. RESULTS: Contralateral flaps used included the internal mammary perforator flap ( n = 28) superficial superior epigastric artery flap ( n = 8), superior epigastric perforator flap ( n = 2), and the second or ninth dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap ( n = 5). All of these flaps, excluding the superficial superior epigastric artery flap, demonstrated length and coverage surface averages that were significantly greater than those of traditional ipsilateral flaps. However, with the contralateral superficial superior epigastric artery, both measures were statistically similar to those of traditional ipsilateral flaps. CONCLUSION: The anatomical variation design suggests that the trunk midline is not a barrier and that perforator flaps in these two regions may be raised on different longitudinal axes without compromising vitality. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Revascularization of the Nipple-Areola Complex following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative vascular mapping has been demonstrated to be an excellent adjunct to perforator flap surgery by reducing operative times and enhancing surgical precision. This study evaluated the benefit of preoperative vascular mapping using magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler ultrasonography to identify the different perforators to the breast and compared it to postoperative mapping. The authors' intent was to determine whether preoperative knowledge of the various vascular sources to the nipple-areola complex affected the outcome and vitality of the nipple-areola complex. METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 15 patients undergoing 25 nipple-sparing mastectomies for breast cancer or genetic predisposition. Ten patients underwent bilateral mastectomy, and five underwent unilateral mastectomy. Mean age was 52 years (range, 30 to 76 years). The mean patient body mass index was 22.4 kg/m2 (range, 20 to 35 kg/m2). Inclusion criteria consisted of breast cancer or genetic predisposition and grade 1 or 2 breast ptosis. Exclusion criteria included prior breast surgery, grade 3 ptosis, and gigantomastia. All patients underwent immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction. RESULTS: Preoperative vascular mapping by magnetic resonance imaging and external Doppler ultrasonography was performed in all 15 patients. In all 25 breasts, the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator was identified preoperatively and preserved intraoperatively. Postoperative imaging demonstrated patency of the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator vessels in all patients. Nipple-areola viability was demonstrated in all breasts. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler ultrasonography for mapping breast perforator vessels is a useful strategy and should be considered for select patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy. Identification of dominant perforators to the breast allowed mastectomy planning with preservation of the important perforator to the mastectomy skin flaps and nipple-areola complex. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Symmetry following unilateral two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: Is there an optimal time for managing the contralateral breast?

INTRODUCTION: Achieving breast symmetry following unilateral mastectomy remains a challenge. Contralateral procedures are usually necessary to achieve breast symmetry. Controversy exists regarding whether these symmetry procedures should be performed at the time of the initial reconstruction or on a delayed basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 105 patients who had unilateral mastectomy, of which 55 had a simultaneous (immediate) contralateral symmetry procedure and 50 had a delayed contralateral symmetry procedure. Outcomes were compared and assessed for each cohort based on demographics, complications, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The delayed cohort required more procedures (3.4 vs. 1.8, p < 0.0001) but shorter overall hospitalization length (2.8 vs. 4.1 days, p < 0.0001). The two cohorts experienced a similar rate of revision (38.3% vs. 49.3%, p = 0.17) The delayed cohort required a contralateral balancing procedure after completion of reconstruction more often than the immediate cohort (p = 0.021). Overall reconstruction-specific complication rates were similar in both cohorts. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), a validated questionnaire for quality-of-life assessment, was administered 3 months after surgery and demonstrated that both cohorts reported similar outcomes when comparing their satisfaction with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that immediate contralateral symmetry operations can be performed safely without increased morbidity. A new algorithm is presented.

The Importance of Fifth Anterior Intercostal Vessels following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The authors describe the vascular anatomy of the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator and its role for perfusion of the nipple-areola complex following nipple-sparing mastectomy. METHODS: Twenty fresh cadavers were injected with 20 cc of colored latex through the internal mammary artery. The catheter was placed at the level of the second intercostal space after removal of the rib. The fifth intercostal space was dissected under magnification to observe the origin and trajectory of the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator. Six selective computed tomographic angiograms of the fifth intercostal artery perforator were performed. A clinical case of nipple-sparing mastectomy in a woman with mammary hypertrophy is provided to demonstrate the utility of preserving the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator. RESULTS: The fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator was consistently observed in all the cases and confirmed by angiography. The perforator gives rise to several branches that traverse in all directions. The ascending branches of the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator are directed toward the nipple-areola complex and course within the subcutaneous layer between the skin and the parenchyma. The fourth and fifth anterior intercostal artery perforators are independent of one another. CONCLUSION: The main ascending branch of the fifth anterior intercostal artery perforator reaches the nipple-areola complex by the subcutaneous tissue independently of the Würinger fascia.

The Deltopectoral/Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flap Revisited: Design Variations Based on Cadaveric and Clinical Investigation.

ABSTRACT: Current understanding of the vascular anatomy of the anterior chest wall suggests that perfusion of the deltopectoral flap may be compromised when crossing the midline at the anterior thoracic wall. The traditional deltopectoral flap is designed longitudinally over the ipsilateral side to avoid the risk of distal flap necrosis. The purpose of this article is to present our experience and results with 26 deltopectoral flaps that were designed and raised with the perforating vessels on the ipsilateral side with the majority of the flap crossing the midline extending to the contralateral side. This anatomic variation in flap design indicates that the sternal midline is not a barrier and that the internal mammary perforator flap may be raised on different longitudinal axes.

Thoracodorsal artery flaps for breast reconstruction-the variants and its approach.

Thoracodorsal artery (TDA) flaps, ranging from the vascular-pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap, the propeller TDAP flap, and the muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap to the conventional latissimus dorsi (LD) flap and the extended LD flap, can all be used for breast reconstruction. The aim of this paper and review is to share our experiences and recommendations for procedure selection when applying TDA-based flaps for breast reconstruction. We describe the different surgical techniques and our thoughts and experience regarding indications and selection between these procedures for individual patients who opt for breast reconstruction. We have performed 574 TDA flaps in 491 patients: 60 extended LD flaps, 122 conventional LD flaps, two MSLD flaps, 233 propeller TDAP flaps, 122 TDAP flaps, and 35 free contralateral TDAP flaps for stacked TDAP breast reconstruction. All the TDA flaps are important flaps for reconstruction of the breast. The LD flap is still an option, although we prefer flaps without muscle when possible. The vascular-pedicled TDAP flap is an option for experienced surgeons, and the propeller TDAP flap can be used in most reconstructive cases of the breast, although a secondary procedure is often necessary for correction of the pedicle bulk. The extended LD flap is an option for women with a substantial body mass index, although it is associated with the highest morbidity of all the TDA flaps. The MSLD flap can be used if the perforators are small or if dissection of the perforators is assessed to be hazardous.

Should breast reconstruction and breast oncoplastic procedures be performed during the coronavirus pandemic?

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the face of the treatment of breast cancer and breast reconstruction globally. Mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction was on the rise due to advances in meshes and implants. However, due to the prioritisation of the critically ill and diversion of the work force, breast cancer treatment has drastically changed. This is an opinion paper written by the authors with experience and importance in the scenario of breast reconstructive surgery. The authors are from different countries with the COVID-19 pandemic in different stages.

D-SUN Method to Prevent Double-Bubble Deformity in Broad Base Breasts with High-Rising Inframammary Fold.

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed plastic surgery among women worldwide. With time, implant selection shifted from arbitrary implantation to precise planning. Different methods address the dimensional planning process. Many of them are complex to put into practice, focusing mainly on the breast base. Constricted, short lower pole breasts are morphologically predisposed to complication such as double-bubble deformity. Yet, by focusing on the distance between the nipple on stretch and the inframammary fold, the D-SUN method guides the surgeon to find the most appropriate implant volume for anatomical form-stable silicon implants and IMF incision to avoid complications.Level of evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Visualized oncoplastic surgery of the breast I: inferior and medial quadrantectomy.

Surgical treatment of breast cancer has changed during the last few decades. Long-term evaluation of several studies performed worldwide have confirmed that conservative surgery (CS) and radical mastectomy have similar survival rates. Due to CS being the gold standard for treatment for most women with breast cancer, advances in materials, mastectomy and reconstructive surgery techniques, now give us the possibility to perform on our patients a great outcome with oncological security. Both advances, in plastic and oncologic surgery, created a new discipline, called oncoplastic breast surgery, that allow surgeons to resect large breast specimens preventing subsequent deformities with the correct previous planning. This is particularly important when more than 30% of the breast volume will be resected because it allows for planning CS depending on the site of the lesion and for establishing the limits between CS and mastectomy.

International Expert Panel Consensus on Fat Grafting of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting has broad applications in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery as a natural filler and for its regenerative purposes. Despite the widespread use of fat grafting, there remains no shared consensus on what constitutes the optimal fat grafting technique and its oncological safety. For this reason, the authors of this study have organized a Survey and an International Consensus Conference that was held at the Aesthetic Breast Meeting in Milan (December 15, 2018). METHODS: All studies on fat grafting, both for breast aesthetic and reconstructive purposes, were electronically screened. The literature review led to 17 "key questions" that were used for the Survey. The authors prepared a set of 10 "key statements" that have been discussed in a dedicated face-to-face session during the meeting. RESULTS: The 10 key statements addressed all the most debated topics on fat grafting of the breast. Levels of evidence for the key statements ranged from III to IV with 2 statements (20%) supported by a level of evidence III and 6 statements (60%) by level of evidence IV. Overall consensus was reached for 2 statements (20%) with >75% agreement reached for 7 statements. CONCLUSIONS: The survey demonstrated a diversity of opinion and attitude among the panelists with regard to technique. Clear recommendations for evidence-based clinical practice for fat grafting use both in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery could not be defined due to the scarcity of level 1 or 2 studies.