Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Oncol ; 27(3): 1010-6, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19816817

ABSTRACT

To report a clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings in a case of primary extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of the uvea associated with massive diffuse extraocular episcleral extension and focal infiltration of the optic nerve and meninges, clinically presented as longstanding uveitis masquerade syndrome. Interventional case reports with histopathological correlation. We describe a 80-year-old male patient with a 3-year history of chronic recurrent hypertensive (pan) uveitis associated with ocular pain, unresponsive to topical and systemic anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, antibiotic/antiviral and antiglaucomatous therapy. Because the eye was not salvageable with conservative treatment, enucleation of blind and painful eye was performed. Findings from histopathological and immunohistochemistry examination of the enucleated eye showed an extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of the uveal tract with massive epibulbar extension and optic nerve and meningeal penetration. During almost 3 years of clinical course and 6 months after the enucleation, there were no systemic manifestations of lymphoma, and patient has not required subsequent treatment. Primary lymphoproliferative lesions of the uvea, comprising the iris, ciliary body and choroid are very rare, associated with epibulbar extension extremely and with optic nerve and menigeal penetration exceptionally. Despite its rarity, primary lymphoma of the uvea should be included in the differential diagnosis particularly in older patients with longstanding recurrent uveitis.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Errors , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/diagnosis , Meninges/pathology , Optic Nerve/pathology , Uveal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uveitis, Anterior/diagnosis , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle , Diagnosis, Differential , Eye Enucleation , Glaucoma, Neovascular/etiology , Glaucoma, Neovascular/surgery , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/complications , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/pathology , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/surgery , Male , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Recurrence , Remission Induction , Retinal Detachment/etiology , Uveal Neoplasms/complications , Uveal Neoplasms/pathology , Uveal Neoplasms/surgery
2.
J Helminthol ; 83(2): 129-37, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19379543

ABSTRACT

Human infection by Dirofilaria repens in Serbia has been increasing steadily. The first case was reported in 1971, presented in the form of a single subcutaneous nodule on the back of a young boy. As established by a literature search, eight additional cases were reported until mid-2001. The most frequent site of infection was subcutaneous tissue, with the exception of two cases, in which parasites were found in subconjunctiva and epididymis. Our study, conducted from 2001 to 2008, encompasses 19 new cases. Most of them (63.1%) presented as ocular or periocular infections, in which the parasite was typically found under the conjunctiva. In other cases a parasitic nodule was localized in the temporal region of the head, epididymis, testicle, abdomen, breast or arm. The diagnosis was made by morphological and histological analysis of the extracted intact worms and parasite sections from the tissue. Morphology of the filarial worms was well preserved in more than half of the cases (12/19) and there was never more than one parasite found inside the lesions. Adult worms and immature nematodes were observed in nine and seven cases, respectively. Furthermore, in two cases microfilariae were discovered inside the pseudocoelom, sections of the female reproductive tubes filled with clearly visible larval stages. Dirofilaria repens infection was diagnosed by its morphological features (17/19) or by performing polymerase chain reactions (PCR) using paraffin-embedded tissues (2/19) in the cases where the morphology was insufficient for identification and the parasites had been determined initially as Dirofilaria spp. The amplified 246 bp PCR product showed that the worms were D. repens.


Subject(s)
Dirofilaria/isolation & purification , Dirofilariasis/parasitology , Eye Diseases/parasitology , Skin Diseases, Infectious/parasitology , Subcutaneous Tissue/parasitology , Adult , Aged , Animals , Dirofilaria/anatomy & histology , Dirofilaria/genetics , Dirofilariasis/epidemiology , Dirofilariasis/pathology , Eye Diseases/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Microfilariae/isolation & purification , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Serbia/epidemiology , Skin Diseases, Infectious/pathology , Subcutaneous Tissue/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL