ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate visual performance after implantation of a new diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) with a +3.50 D addition power. METHODS: A total of 24 cataract patients were bilaterally implanted with the Diffractiva-aA MIOL in 2 ophthalmologic centers and followed for 6 months. Postoperative evaluations included visual acuities (VA) at various distances, defocus testing, contrast sensitivity (CS) measurements, and patient satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, binocular uncorrected VA (mean ± SD; logMAR) was 0.00 ± 0.05 (≈ 20/20) for distance, 0.06 ± 0.13 (≈ 20/23) for intermediate (1 m), and 0.00 ± 0.05 (≈ 20/20) for near (40 cm). All patients achieved uncorrected VA of 20/25 or better for distance and near, and 20/40 or better at 1 m. Monocular and binocular defocus curves showed 2 peaks of maximum VA at the distance focus (0.0 D) and the near focus (-2.5 D) and a good range of intermediate vision with the lowest mean acuity being at -1.5 D defocus. Photopic and mesopic CS were within the standard normal range. The majority of patients (n = 22; 91.7%) were spectacle independent; 8.3% (n = 2) reported wearing glasses occasionally for very small print (1 patient) or for watching television (1 patient). Overall, all patients were "very satisfied" (n = 22; 91.7%) or "satisfied" (n = 2; 8.3%) with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The new Diffractiva-aA MIOL provided a full range of vision from near to far generating highly satisfied, spectacle independent patients with only minimal visual disturbances at night.
Subject(s)
Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axial Length, Eye , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare changes in reading performance parameters after implantation of 4 multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) models and a monofocal IOL. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with bilateral cataract without additional ocular pathology were scheduled for bilateral implantation of Acri.Smart 48S monofocal, Acrysof Restor SN6AD3 apodized multifocal, AT LISA 366D diffractive multifocal, Tecnis ZMA00 diffractive multifocal, or Rezoom refractive multifocal IOLs. Bilateral corrected and uncorrected reading acuity, reading distance, mean and maximum reading speeds, and smallest log-scaled print size of a Radner reading chart were evaluated under bright lighting conditions (500 lux) using the Salzburg Reading Desk. Pupil size was not measured throughout the trial. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: The diffractive multifocal groups had significantly better uncorrected reading acuity and uncorrected smallest print size than the monofocal and refractive multifocal groups 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The diffractive IOL groups had comparable uncorrected reading distance of approximately 32 cm, which was larger in the monofocal group (38.9 ± 8.4 cm) and refractive multifocal group (37.1 ± 7.3 cm) at the last visit. Patients with diffractive IOLs could read print sizes of approximately 0.74 to 0.87 mm, which was much better than in the monofocal and refractive multifocal groups. The diffractive AT LISA IOL provided the best reading speed values (mean and maximum, corrected and uncorrected). CONCLUSION: Multifocal IOLs with a diffractive component provided good reading performance that was significantly better than that obtained with a refractive multifocal or monofocal IOL. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Drs. Grabner and Dexl were patent owners of the Salzburg Reading Desk technology (now owned by SRD-Vision, LLC). No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Subject(s)
Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Pseudophakia/physiopathology , Reading , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Light , Male , Microsurgery , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Suture Techniques , Vision Disorders/rehabilitationABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare bilateral reading performance within the first 6 months after implantation of 4 intraocular lens (IOL) models. SETTING: Vissum-Instituto de Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain, and University Eye Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Patients had bilateral phacoemulsification and implantation of Acri.Smart 48S monofocal, Acrysof Restor SN6AD3 apodized multifocal, Acri.LISA 366D diffractive multifocal, or Rezoom refractive multifocal IOLs. Bilateral reading performance with and without near correction was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Salzburg Reading Desk. RESULTS: The study comprised 304 eyes of 152 patients 51 to 90 years old. All groups had a significant improvement in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities postoperatively (P≤.01). The apodized multifocal and diffractive multifocal groups had significantly better uncorrected reading acuity than the monofocal and refractive multifocal groups 1 month and 6 months postoperatively (P<.01). Uncorrected reading speed was significantly worse in the refractive multifocal group than in the monofocal group at 1 month (P<.01). The monofocal group had the greatest uncorrected reading distance at 1 month and 6 months (P<.01). CONCLUSION: Multifocal IOLs with a diffractive component provided a comparable reading performance that was significantly better than the one obtained with refractive multifocal and monofocal IOLs.