Patient Expectations of Pain Versus Experienced Expectations of Pain Following Shoulder Injection.

PURPOSE: Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and hyaluronic acid injections to either the subacromial space (SAS) or the glenohumeral joint (GHJ) of the shoulder are commonly used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in outpatient settings. The first aim of this study was to determine whether the anticipated pain level differed significantly from the actual pain level experienced by patients who underwent shoulder injections. The second aim was to determine whether there was a significant difference in these pain levels between SAS and GHJ injections. The secondary goal was to investigate the correlation between patients' demographic data, anxiety characteristics, and pain scores. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. METHODS: This study involved patients who completed a three-part questionnaire prior as well as following an injections to the GHJ\SAS. FINDINGS: Sixty-three patients (28 males; 35 females), mean age of 54.28 years (standard deviation 13.95, range 25 to 84) met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference between the anticipated and the experienced pain (visual analog score 6.03 vs 3.17, P < .001). Experienced pain of the GHJ injections (n = 34) was rated as being greater than that of the SAS injections (n = 29) with borderline significance (visual analog scale 3.79 vs 2.36; P = .05). Forty-five patients (71.42%) reported a decrease in at least one pain category between anticipated and experienced pain compared to an increase reported by two patients (3.17%). CONCLUSIONS: Injections to the GHJ and SAS were shown to be significantly less painful than anticipated by the patients. GHJ injections were perceived as more painful than SAS injections. Communicating this evidence-based reassuring information with patients prior to an injection may alleviate fear of the procedure, reduce the perception of pain, and ultimately improve compliance with the procedure.

MRI-based navigated cryosurgery of extra-abdominal desmoid tumors using skin fiducial markers: a case series of 15 cases.

BACKGROUND: Precision surgery is becoming increasingly important in the field of Orthopaedic Oncology. Image-guided percutaneous cryosurgery (CRA) has emerged as a valid treatment modality for extra-abdominal desmoid tumors (EDTs). To date, most CRA procedures use CT-based guidance which fails to properly characterize tumor segments. Computer-guided MRI navigation can address this issue however, the lack of a fixed landmark for registration remains a challenge. Successful CRA correlates directly with precision approaches facilitated by intraoperative imaging guidance. This is the first study that attempts to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a novel approach of using skin fiducial markers to overcome the challenge of a MRI-based navigation CRA for symptomatic or progressive EDTs. METHODS: In this retrospective study conducted between 2018 and 2020, 11 patients at a single center with symptomatic or progressive EDTs were treated with CRA using intraoperative MRI navigation. Fifteen cryosurgery procedures were performed, each adhering to a personalized pre-operative plan. Total tumor size, viable and non-viable portions pre- and post-operation, and SF-36 questionnaire evaluating subjective health were recorded. RESULTS: All CRAs demonstrated 100% adherence to the predetermined plan. Overall, tumor size decreased Median= -56.9% [-25.6, -72.4]) with a reduction in viable tissue, (Median= -80.4% [-53.3, -95.2]). Four patients required additional CRAs. Only one patient's tumor did not reduce in size. One patient suffered from local muscle necrosis. Pre-operation, the average physical and mental scores 41.6 [29.4, 43] and 26.3 [17.6, 40.9] respectively. Post-operation, the average physical and mental scores were 53.4[38, 59.7] and 38 [31.2, 52.7] respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings provide an early indication of the feasibility and efficacy of performing percutaneous cryosurgery using skin fiducial marker registration for MRI-computed navigation to treat EDTs safely. Larger cohorts and multicenter evaluations are needed to determine the efficacy of this technique.

Proximal endoscopic repair of the hamstring tendons: a cadaveric anatomical study of posterior hip portals.

Arthroscopy and endoscopic hip surgery have attracted increasing attention in the orthopedic field. In the case of arthroscopy, portals and their relationships with neurovascular bundle structures at risk are well established. However, studies on endoscopic portals used for the repair of hamstring tendon injuries are insufficient. Hamstring injuries are the most common muscle injury in sports medicine, and up to 12% can present as a tendon rupture. Endoscopic surgery is advantageous because it has a lower rate of bleeding and avoids excessive handling of the gluteal muscles. The objective of this study is to perform an anatomical evaluation of endoscopic portals for hamstring repair and measure their distance to neurovascular structures-mainly sciatic nerve and posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN). Fifteen hips from frozen and formalized cadavers were evaluated. Specimens that showed any modification in their anatomy were excluded. Portals were simulated using Steinmann pins, and anatomical dissection was performed. Distances from neurovascular structures were measured using a digital caliper. Four male cadaver hips (26%) and eleven female cadaver hips (74%) were included. Two dissected hips presented PFCN injury through the posterolateral portal- mean 20.28 mm (±8.14), and one through the distal accessory portal- 21.87 mm (±12.03). The injury rate for PFCN was 3/15 or 20%. None of the portals presented sciatic nerve injury. Conclusion: There is an imminent risk of nerve injury to the PFCN by performing the lateral portals for hamstring repair. To avoid this, we recommend starting the procedure through the most medial (posteromedial) portal, and the other portals must be performed under direct visualization.

The anterior superior iliac spine is a reliable novel landmark for preemptive periacetabular analgesia in hip arthroscopy.

Appropriate post-operative (post-op) pain control has been shown to reduce length of stay and facilitate day case surgery. Periacetabular injection of bupivacaine is effective in pain reduction after hip arthroscopy. This study aims to evaluate the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) as an anatomical landmark to facilitate needle insertion prior to fluoroscopy. The meeting point derived from a vertical line one fingerbreadth distal to the ASIS and a longitudinal line from the greater trochanter (GT) was used as a landmark in 30 consecutive hip arthroscopy patients for periacetabular analgesia. The distance between the tip of the needle and the acetabular roof was measured via fluoroscopy. Needle location was corrected if needed, followed by periacetabular bupivacaine injection (at anterior, lateral and posterior joint aspects). Post-op pain was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 4-6 h post-op and at discharge. The ASIS and GT were identified and used for periacetabular analgesia landmarks in all cases. Results revealed that 93.3% of needle entries fell within 10 mm of the lateral acetabular rim and only one case had fallen distal to it. The post-op mean VAS score was 1.03 (range 0-6, standard error - 0.30, median = 0). At hospital discharge, 90% (27/30 of patients) reported VAS score ≤ 5. Twenty-six of the 30 patients were discharged on the same day as the operation (remaining four patients stayed due to accommodation/traveling issues). The ASIS and GT can be used as an anatomical landmark for periacetabular analgesia in hip arthroscopy with reproducible needle location, significant analgesic effect and minimal radiation.

The "Selfie Test": A Novel Test for the Diagnosis of Lateral Epicondylitis.

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most diagnosed elbow pathologies. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of a new test (selfie test) for the diagnosis of LE. Methods: Medical data were collected from adult patients who presented with LE symptoms and ultrasound findings that supported the diagnosis. Patients underwent a physical examination, including provocative tests for diagnosis as well as the selfie test, and were asked to fill out the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire and subjectively rate the activity of their affected elbow. Results: Thirty patients were included in this study (seventeen females, 57%). The mean age was 50.1 years old (range of 35 to 68 years). The average duration of symptoms was 7 ± 3.1 months (range of 2 to 14 months). The mean PRTEE score was 61.5 ± 16.1 (range of 35 to 98), and the mean subjective elbow score was 63 ± 14.2 (range of 30 to 80). Mill's, Maudsley's, Cozen's, and the selfie tests had sensitivities of 0.867, 0.833, 0.967, and 0.933, respectively, with corresponding positive predictive values of 0.867, 0.833, 0.967, and 0.933. Conclusions: The selfie test's active nature, which allows patients to perform the assessment themselves, could be a valuable addition to the diagnostic process, potentially improving the accuracy of the diagnosis of LE (levels of evidence: IV).

Favorable outcomes of navigated percutaneous ablation and cementoplasty of bone metastasis in the extremities and pelvis-a case series of 13 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Palliative treatment options for bone metastasis are limited, especially in cases where standard protocols have already failed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ablation, either by cryoablation or radiofrequency, combined with percutaneous cementoplasty using cone-beam guided navigation. The objective was to relieve symptoms and improve functionality in patients suffering from pain secondary to bone metastases, as well as evaluate local disease progression post ablation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 13 patients (average age 63.6 ± 9.8, nine females) with symptomatic skeletal metastases treated using 3D imaging with navigation and followed for at least 12 months. The treatment protocol was implemented either after failure of first line treatment, or as first line when mechanical instability was present. Percutaneous lesion ablation was performed along with percutaneous cementation. RESULTS: In this study, we observed a statistically significant decrease in pain. The mean Visual Analog Scale pain score decreased from 7.1 ± 0.4 prior to CRA/RFA to 2.2 ± 0.3 after the procedure (p < 0.001). At the 12-months follow-up, all patients were able to ambulate with no assistance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group <2). One minor adverse event (paresthesia) and one major adverse event (drop foot) were resolved at 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of bone metastasis with RFA and CRA in conjunction with cementoplasty using Cone-beam computed tomography navigation provides patients with significant palliative outcomes and in most cases, local tumor control.

Inter and intra-observer agreement of the 3-dimensional CT based anterior inferior iliac spine classification system shows fair-to-moderate agreement among high volume hip surgeons.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multicenter, multinational study is to evaluate the agreement level of the Hetsroni's classification system across high-volume hip surgeons who specialize in hip preservation surgeries. METHODS: Four surgeons from three countries reviewed a digital survey that included 93 3D CT images of the hip from 53 patients. The population was composed of individuals who had undergone a pelvis CT scan in a tertiary hospital between 2000 and 2016. Each rater reviewed the images and classified each image according to AIIS subtype I, II, or III. After a minimum of two months, the raters repeated the survey. The inter-rater and intra-rater agreement was then assessed. The kappa values were calculated to determine variability. RESULTS: Inter-rater agreement levels yielded fair agreement for both sessions (Kappa = 0.4, p value < 0.001 in the first and Kappa = 0.27, p value < 0.001 in the second). Inter-rater agreement levels separating non-pathological Type I from pathological Types II and III yielded moderate to fair inter-rater agreement levels (K = 0.47, p value < 0.001 in the first session and k = 0.32, p value < 0.001 in the second). Intra-rater reliability displayed moderate agreement (average K = 0.53). CONCLUSION: The current 3D CT-based AIIS classification system shows fair-to-moderate inter- and intra-rater agreement among high-volume hip surgeons. According to this study, the agreement of the Hetsroni classification system is not able to be sufficiently reproduced. Since accurate classification of the AIIS morphology is imperative in establishing proper treatment for SSI, this classification system there is therefore limited in its clinical value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The "purse string" technique for anterior glenohumeral instability: long-term results 7-13-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: The "Purse-String Technique" (PST) is an arthroscopic horizontal mattress suture technique for recurrent anterior shoulder instability that uses a single double-loaded suture anchor at the 4-o' clock position, achieving a Bankart labral repair and an infero-superior capsular shift. In this study, we describe the long-term results of the PST. METHODS: The study included 69 individuals (70 shoulders), with a mean age of 30 years, who had recurrent post-traumatic anteroinferior instability. A purse-string suture anchor at the 4-o'clock position was used to address the Bankart lesion and capsular laxity, recreating the anterior glenoid bumper. All patients were assessed via telephone interview at a mean of 116 months after surgery (7-13-year follow-up). RESULTS: Postoperatively, the mean Constant score was 94, mean Rowe score was 93 and mean Walch-Duplay score was 89. 89% of patients resumed their preinjury sport activities, with 61% of patients achieving preinjury levels and most professional athletes returning to full activity. Seven patients had recurrent dislocation postoperatively (10% failure rate). Of these patients, three had revision arthroscopic stabilization, one patient had revision arthroscopic stabilization with remplissage, two had a Latarjet procedure, whereas one patient decided to seek no further treatment. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of PST are promising, with a low failure rate, high patient satisfaction and a high rate of return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Case series; Treatment study.

Violation of expectations is correlated with satisfaction following hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: The mechanism by which preoperative expectations may be associated with patient satisfaction and procedural outcomes following hip preservation surgery (HPS) is far from simple or linear. The purpose of this study is to better understand patient expectations regarding HPS and their relationship with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS: Patients scheduled for hip arthroscopy completed the Hip Preservation Surgery Expectations Survey (HPSES) and the pre- and a minimum 2 year postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Patient demographics, including age, gender, occupation, and body mass index (BMI), were also collected. At the latest follow-up, patients were evaluated for subjective satisfaction and postoperative complications. ML algorithms and standard statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included in this study (mean age 33.7 ± 13.1 years, 62.3% males). The mean follow-up period was 27 months. The mean HPSES score, patient satisfaction, preoperative, and postoperative iHOT-33 were 83.8 ± 16.5, 75.9 ± 26.9, 31.6 ± 15.8, and 73 ± 25.9, respectively. Fifty-nine patients (86%) reported that they would undergo the surgery again, with no significant difference with regards to expectations. A significant difference was found with regards to expectation violation (p < 0.001). Expectation violation scores were also found to be significantly correlated with satisfaction. CONCLUSION: ML algorithms utilized in this study demonstrate that violation of expectations plays an important predictive role in postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction and is associated with patients' willingness to undergo surgery again. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty may reduce cerebrovascular accidents and improve early weight-bearing in the elderly after femoral neck fracture.

ABSTRACT: Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) in the elderly population after femoral neck fracture remain great concern for physicians. Specifically, surgical fixation techniques, such as bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) and internal fixation play a significant role in influencing the occurrence of postoperative CVA in the elderly population.In order to identify 2 cohorts, we used a rigid selection process based on our institution's database. The cohorts were comprised of a HA cohort and a cannulated screw cohort, of which underwent femoral neck surgery, performed by 3 fellowship trained surgeons from 2003 to 2014. Risk factors were documented and measured, including Coumadin use and hypertension, and postoperative complications such as CVA and death rate were also recorded. A P-value of <.05 was determined to be statistically significant.A power analysis was performed and achieved a power of 0.95. We found a non-significant reduction in CVA for bipolar HA (3.6% CVA vs 0.0% in the non-CVA group, P = .48) and a non-significant increase in CVA for cannulated screw use (7.6% CVA vs 14.4% in the non-CVA group, P = .11). In addition, we found a significant difference in terms of weight-bearing status at 6-weeks postoperatively (0.95 vs 2.0, P < .0001), favoring the bipolar HA group.Among the advantages of bipolar HA surgery, surgeons should consider its value in reducing the occurrence of postoperative CVA. Furthermore, patients who underwent bipolar HA had improved weight-bearing status postoperatively compared with cannulated screw fixation.

Preemptive analgesia in hip arthroscopy: intra-articular bupivacaine does not improve pain control after preoperative peri-acetabular blockade.

INTRODUCTION: Literature addressing postoperative pain management after hip arthroscopy is relatively scarce. This study aimed to assess if there was added analgesic benefit associated with postoperative intra-articular bupivacaine blockade for patients who received preoperative peri-acetabular blockade for hip arthroscopy procedures. METHODS: 52 patients were included in this comparative cohort study. Group 1 consisted of 20 patients who received preoperative peri-acetabular blockade and postoperative intra-articular blockade. The control group (Group 2), consisted of 32 patients who received only preoperative peri-acetabular blockade. Postoperative pain was recorded via visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, analgesic consumption, and pain diaries for 2 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the experimental group at the 30-minute recovery room assessment (VAS scores Group 1: 1.1; Group 2: 3.00, p = 0.034). Other than the 30-minute recovery room assessment, VAS pain scores, narcotic medication consumption, and non-narcotic analgesic consumption did not differ between the 2 groups at any time point in the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate significant clinical benefit for patients who receive postoperative intra-articular blockade in addition to preoperative peri-acetabular blockade with bupivacaine 0.5%. We recommend the use of preoperative peri-acetabular bupivacaine blockade without intra-articular blockade postoperatively for pain control in the setting of hip arthroscopy surgery.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Not Reliable in Classifying Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Morphology Compared to 3-Dimensional Computerized Tomography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the reliability of standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of AIIS morphology compared with three-dimensional (3D) computerized tomography (CT) (reference standard). METHODS: Sixty hips in 30 patients met the inclusion criteria. The images were reviewed and classified by two fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. A second imaging viewing session was conducted in the same manner for validation of AIIS evaluation. The agreement and accuracy indices between the two raters were calculated for each imaging modality (inter-rater agreement) as well the agreement across the imaging modality for each rater (intermethod agreement). RESULTS: The inter-rater agreement for the morphological evaluation of the AIIS for the first session according to 3D CT was .553 (P < .05) and by means of MRI was .0163 (P < .05). The inter-rater agreement for the second session by means of 3D CT was .449 (P < .05) and according to MRI was 0 (P < .05). The inter-method agreement for rater 1 for the first session was .04 (P < 0.05), while the agreement for rater 2 was .016 (P < .05). The intermethod agreement for rater 1 on the second session was .35 (P < 0.05), while that of rater 2 was .297(P < .05). The overall accuracy of MRI compared to 3D CT for rater 1 for the first session was .531, .490, and .959 for types I, II, III respectively and .551, .531, and .980 for the second session for types I, II, and III respectively. The overall accuracy of MRI compared to 3D CT for rater 2 for the first session was .551, .469, and .918 for types I, II, III respectively and .633, .592, and .918 for the second session for types I, II, and III, respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI evaluations and subsequent classifications of AIIS morphology demonstrated a poor to slight correlation compared with that of the reference standard of 3D CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, retrospective diagnostic study.

Preoperative Expectations Do Not Correlate With Postoperative iHOT-33 Scores and Patient Satisfaction Following Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To examine the correlation between preoperative patient expectation and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) score and postoperative satisfaction of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. METHODS: Patients scheduled for surgery completed the Hip Preservation Surgery Expectations Survey (HPSES), as well as the preoperative and a minimum 2-year postoperative iHOT-33. Patient demographics that were collected included gender, age, occupation, and body mass index (BMI). At the latest follow-up, patients were evaluated for their subjective satisfaction and postoperative complications. An in-depth analysis was performed to assess the correlation between HPSES, iHOT-33, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (62.3% males; mean age: 33.7 ± 13.1 years; BMI: 23.9 ± 3.5 kg/m2) were included in this study. The mean HPSES score was 83.8 ± 16.5. The mean iHOT-33 improved from 31.6 ± 15.8 preoperatively to 73 ± 25.9 postoperatively (95% CI = 35.2,47.8; P < .01), and the mean patient satisfaction was 75.9 ± 26.9. There were no statistically significant differences in mean HPSES score between males and females (95% CI = 79.9,87.8; P = .35) nor between different occupational groups (95% CI = 79.4,87.6, P = .095). No correlation was found between age and HPSES score (r = .036; P =.76). There was a negligible correlation between HPSES score and postoperative iHOT-33 score (r = -.117; P = .34) and patient satisfaction (r = -.042; P = .73). Postoperative iHOT-33 score had a significant high correlation with patient satisfaction (r = .8; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative expectations do not correlate with postoperative iHOT-33 scores and patient satisfaction with surgery at 2 years after surgery. Gender and occupation did not differ significantly with regard to preoperative expectations, and there was no correlation between age and HPSES score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Age-Adjusted Normative Values for Hip Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential clinical instruments used for assessing patient function, assisting in clinical decision making, and quantifying outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management. However, PROMs are often designed using patients with preexisting pathology and typically assume that a patient without the pathology would have a perfect or near perfect score. This may result in unrealistic expectations or falsely underestimate how well a patient is doing after treatment. The influence of age on PROMs about the hip of healthy individuals has not been studied. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that in asymptomatic individuals hip-specific PROM scores will decrease in an age-dependent manor. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: In this multicenter survey study, volunteers who denied preexisting hip pathology and previous hip surgery completed 3 PROMs online or as traditional paper questionnaires. The International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT), the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and HOS-Sport were completed. Analysis of variance with a Tukey post hoc test was used to analyze differences in PROMs among subgroups. An independent-samples Student t test and a χ2 test were used to analyze differences in continuous and categorical data, respectively. RESULTS: In total 496, 571, 534, and 532 responses were collected for the iHOT, mHHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-Sport, respectively. Respondents' PROMs were scored and arranged into 3 groups by age: <40 years, 40 to 60 years, and >60 years. The iHOT, mHHS, HOS-ADL, and HOS-Sport of these asymptomatic respondents all decreased in an age-dependent manner: iHOT (<40, 94.1; 40-60, 92.4; >60, 87.0), mHHS (<40, 94.8; 40-60, 91.3; >60, 89.1), HOS-ADL (<40, 98.4; 40-60, 95.0; >60, 90.9), and HOS-Sport (<40, 95.7; 40-60, 82.9; >60, 72.9) (analysis of variance between-group differences, P < .05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the iHOT, mHHS, and HOS-ADL and HOS-Sport scores in asymptomatic people decrease in an age-dependent manner. It is important to compare a patient's outcome scores with the age-normalized scores to establish an accurate reference frame with which to interpret outcomes.

Arthroscopic Repair of Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral Ligament Lesions: Outcomes at 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) is an uncommon condition but a major contributor to shoulder instability and functional decline. PURPOSE: To describe the pre- and postoperative HAGL lesion presentations of instability, pain, and functionality and the return-to-sports activities in patients managed arthroscopically for anterior and posterior HAGL lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Data on patients with HAGL lesions treated with arthroscopic repair between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively retrieved from medical charts, and the patients were interviewed to assess their level of postoperative functionality. The Rowe; Constant; University of California, Los Angeles; Oxford; and pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores were obtained for both pre- and postoperative status. Return-to-sports activities and level of activities after surgery were compared with the preinjury state, and complications, reoperations, and recurrent instability were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: There were 23 study patients (12 females and 11 males; mean age, 24 years). The mean follow-up duration was 24.4 months (range, 7-99 months; median, 17 months). In 7 (30.4%) of the patients, HAGL lesions were diagnosed only intraoperatively. A significant improvement was seen in all examined postoperative functional scores and VAS. At the last follow-up visit, 2 patients (8.7%) reported residual instability with no improvement in pain levels and declined any further treatment, and 3 others (13.0%) required revision surgeries for additional shoulder pathologies (reoperations were performed 18-36 months after the index procedure). The remaining 18 patients (78.3%) were free of pain and symptoms. There was a mean of 0.65 coexisting pathologies per patient, mostly superior labral anterior-posterior, Bankart, and rotator cuff lesions. CONCLUSION: HAGL lesions are often missed during routine workup in patients with symptoms of instability, and a high level of suspicion is essential during history acquisition, clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram interpretation, and arthroscopic evaluation. Arthroscopic repair yields good pain and stability results; however, some high-level athletes may not return to their preinjury level of activity.

Clinical Assessment and Treatment Options for Posterior Hip Pain.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment of posterior hip pain has increased due to advancements in clinical, anatomical, biomechanical, and related pathological understandings of the hip. Due to its complexity and close anatomical relationship with many osseous, neurovascular, and musculotendinous structures, posterior hip pain must be appropriately categorized based on its origin. Therefore, it is crucial that clinicians are able to determine whether patient complaints are of extra-articular or intra-articular nature so that they can implement the optimal treatment plan. In the current review article, we discussed posterior hip pain with an emphasis on the main differential diagnoses of deep gluteal syndrome, ischiofemoral impingement, and hamstring tear/hamstring syndrome. For the appropriate diagnosis and etiology of posterior hip pain, a thorough and conclusive clinical history is imperative. Physicians should rule out the possibility of spinal involvement by physical examination and if necessary, by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, because of the vicinity to other, non-orthopedic structures, an obstetric and gynecologic history, general surgery history, and urologic history should be obtained. Following the collection of patient history clinicians should adhere to an established and efficient order of evaluation starting with standing then to seated, supine, lateral, and prone testing. Imaging assessment of posterior hip pain begins with a standard anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph, in addition to frog-leg lateral. MRI is pivotal for assessing soft tissue-related extra-articular causes of hip in patients with posterior hip pain. Non-surgical treatment is preferred in most cases of deep gluteal syndrome, ischiofemoral impingement, pudendal nerve entrapment, and proximal hamstring pathologies. Surgical treatment is saved as a last resort option in cases of failed non-surgical treatment.

Cryo-surgery for symptomatic extra-abdominal desmoids. A proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Extra abdominal desmoid tumors are rare, highly aggressive, and invasive benign soft tissue tumors. Current treatment modalities show high levels of recurrence and comorbidities. Cryo-surgery as an alternative was subsequently investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective, single center study 11 patients showing symptomatic tumors were treated with individualized cryo-surgery. Treatment protocol included preoperative planning using computer rendered 3D models, intraoperative navigation and execution using cone beam guidance, and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging image analysis using a gaussian mixture model software. Subjective outcomes were reported using Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixteen ablations were performed, each demonstrating a complete match with the determined preoperative plan and model. A total of 9/11 (82%) of patients showed improvements in symptoms and a reduction in tumor volume while 2/11 (18%) did not. Average reduction in tumor volume and viable segments were 36.7% (p = 0.0397) and 63.3% (p = 0.0477), respectively. Mild complications according to the SIR Adverse Event Classification Guidelines were experienced in 3/16 (19%) ablations. SF-36 scores showed a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.0194) in the mental health category and a nonsignificant (p = 0.8071) improvement in the physical health category. CONCLUSION: Cryo-surgery using the three-phase protocol as described may improve the overall outcome of future ablation procedures.

The Efficacy of Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: With a greater understanding of the importance of the acetabular labrum in the function of the hip, labral repair is preferred over debridement. However, in some scenarios, preservation or repair of the labrum is not possible, and labral reconstruction procedures have been growing in popularity as an alternative to labral resection. PURPOSE: To provide an up-to-date analysis of the literature to determine the overall efficacy of labral reconstruction when compared with labral repair or resection. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched for literature regarding labral reconstruction in the hip before July 21, 2020. The results were screened and evaluated by 2 reviewers, and a third reviewer resolved any discrepancies. The final studies were evaluated using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies) score. RESULTS: There were 7 comparative studies that fit the inclusion criteria, with 228 hips from 197 patients. The mean follow-up was 34.6 months, and the mean age of all patients was 38.34 years. There were slightly more female patients than male patients (105 vs 92). Arthroscopic reconstruction was performed in 86% of studies (6/7); open surgical techniques, in 14% (1/7). A variety of grafts was used in the reconstructions. The indications for labral reconstruction and outcome measures varied in these publications. Nine patients were lost follow-up, and 6 patients converted to total hip replacement postlabral reconstruction. The assessment of these comparative studies illustrated statistically equivalent results between labral reconstruction and labral repair. Comparisons of labral reconstruction with labral resection also showed statistically equivalent postoperative patient-reported outcome scores; however, the rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty were significantly higher in the population undergoing resection. CONCLUSION: The review of current available comparative literature, which consists entirely of level 3 studies, suggests that labral reconstruction does improve postoperative outcomes but does not demonstrate superiority over repair. There may, however, be benefit to performing labral reconstruction over resection owing to the higher rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty in the labral resection group.

Midterm Outcomes and Satisfaction After Hip Arthroscopy Are Associated With Postoperative Rehabilitation Factors.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic hip-preservation surgery is commonly performed to address nonarthritic sources of hip pain in young, active individuals. However, there is little evidence to support postoperative rehabilitation protocols, including the most appropriate frequency and length of individual formal physical therapy sessions. There is also a lack of information to look at patients' perceived value of their home program/self-practice in relation to outcomes. PURPOSE: To investigate postoperative rehabilitation factors after hip arthroscopy related to formal physical therapy and home program/self-practice and their correlation with patient outcomes and satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 125 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and a labral tear (75 men) were included. The mean age was 34.6 ± 14.4 years, and the mean follow-up time was 4.9 ± 1.6 years. Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL) scores, overall satisfaction scores, and factors related to supervised physical therapy and home program/self-practice were collected. Correlations between continuous variables and differences in the length of individual formal physical therapy and patients' rating of the importance of their home program/self-practice between those who would and those who would not undergo surgery again were assessed. RESULTS: The frequency and length of individual formal physical therapy sessions were significantly correlated with postoperative HOS-ADL scores (r = 0.22, P = .014; and r = 0.24, P = .007, respectively) and level of satisfaction (r = 0.24, P = .007; and r = 0.21, P = .02, respectively). The length of individual formal physical therapy sessions was significantly greater in those who noted they would undergo surgery again (35.3 vs 26.3; P = .033). A significant correlation was identified between the rating of the importance of their home program/self-practice and postoperative HOS-ADL scores (r = 0.29; P = .001) and their level of satisfaction (r = 0.23; P = .009). There was a significant difference in the rating of the importance of their home program/self-practice between those who would undergo surgery again and those who would not (8.9 vs 7.8; P = .007). CONCLUSION: Surgeons and physical therapists should emphasize the value of home program/self-practice when it comes to outcomes and may want to encourage their patients to participate in more frequent, longer, formal physical therapy sessions.

Sonographic evaluation of anterior inferior iliac spine morphology demonstrates excellent accuracy when compared to false profile view.

PURPOSE: To compare ultrasound examination to false profile radiographs in identification and classification of AIIS morphology. The study hypothesis stated that sonographic imaging of the AIIS correlates well to AIIS morphology seen on false profile radiographs. METHODS: Fifty-three hips in 30 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria. A single, fellowship trained, orthopedic surgeon performed an ultrasound on all of the patients to evaluate the AIIS morphology. The patients underwent standing false profile radiographs. The US and radiographic images were independently reviewed and classified according to Hetsroni classification of AIIS morphology by two senior, fellowship trained, orthopedic surgeons. Agreement between the two raters was calculated for each imaging modality (inter-rater agreement) as well as the agreement between the rating in each modality by the same rater ("inter-method" agreement). RESULTS:  The agreement between the raters (inter-rater agreement) for morphologic evaluation of the AIIS by means of FP view was 88.8% (p < 0.001) and that by means of US was 81.5%(p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the US compared to the FP view was 92.3% (48/52) for both rater 1 and 2. CONCLUSION:  This study showed near-perfect agreement in analyzing the morphology of the AIIS in a group of patients with hip pathology. Office sonographic evaluation of the AIIS is reliable and, therefore, may be routinely utilized in the clinic setting avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.