ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the last decades, the use of the helmet interface to deliver noninvasive respiratory support has steadily increased. When delivering oxygen therapy, conditioning of inspired gas is mandatory, as the water content of medical gas is neglectable. To minimize the risk of airway damage, it is recommended to achieve an absolute humidity greater than 10 mg H2O/L. The primary aim of the study was to assess the performance of 3 different heated humidifiers to condition gas during helmet continuous positive airway pressure and to compare them with a setting without active humidification. METHODS: We performed a crossover randomized physiological study in healthy volunteers. Absolute humidity, relative humidity, and temperature were measured during 4 steps (no humidification and the 3 heated humidifiers, performed in a randomized order) and at 3 time points (after 1, 5, and 10 minutes). RESULTS: Eight subjects participated to the study. Without active humidification, absolute humidity was constantly below the recommended level. All humidifiers conditioned the inspired gases to an average absolute humidity greater than 10 mg H2O/L. Overall, the best performance, in terms of absolute humidity, was obtained with H900 (19.74 ± 0.50 mg H2O/L), followed by TurbH2O (-6.82 mg H2O/L vs H900; 95% confidence interval, -8.49 to -5.14; P < .05) and F&P 810 (-9.03 mg H2O/L vs H900; 95% confidence interval, -10.70 to -7.35; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Active humidification is required to achieve adequate conditioning of inspired gas during helmet continuous positive airway pressure. The choice between different humidifiers available on the market should be made according to the local needs and expertise.