ABSTRACT
Background: Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) and nicotinic acid phosphoribosyl transferase (NAPRT) are key intracellular enzymes that participate in the biosynthesis on NAD but have also been shown to be released as proinflammatory cytokines. A number of reports have shown that circulating NAMPT is increased in serum of patients with inflammatory disorders, including inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), while nothing is known regarding circulating NAPRT and the presence of both cytokines in IBD patient stools. In the present study, we evaluated eNAMPT and eNAPRT levels in a large cohort of IBD patients not on biological therapy and in a subset that then was prescribed biologics. Methods: We conducted a retro-perspective study on 180 patients, of which 111 underwent subsequent biological treatment (adalimumab, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab). We analyzed eNAMPT and eNAPRT concentrations in serum and faces of IBD patients, correlating them with response to biologics. Results: We now report that eNAMPT and eNAPRT are significantly increased in both serum and stools of IBD patients. NAMPT and NAPRT levels correlate with disease severity, with C reactive protein and with serum IL-6 levels. Importantly, levels of NAMPT in patients starting treatment with adalimumab correlate with response failure at three months: patients with levels above 4 ng/ml were significantly less likely to obtain benefit. Serum NAMPT as a biomarker of response yields a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%. Conclusion: The present work strongly suggests that a prospective trial evaluating eNAMPT and eNAPRT levels in relation to response to biologicals in IBD should be initiated.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a frequent endocrine pathology that has surgical treatment as its only decisive measure. High-Resolution Neck Ultrasonography with color-Doppler (CDHR-NUS) and 99mTechnetium-SestaMIBI Parathyroid Scintigraphy (99mTc-MIBI PS) are the two instrumental exams more commonly used in the preoperatory localization of pathologic parathyroids. The aim of this observational study was to outline-in accordance with the latest scientific literature-the precise role of CDHR-NUS in the environment of PHPT, comparing it with that of Parathyroid Scintigraphy. METHODS: 136 patients operated on for PHPT and underwent CDHR-NUS and 99mTc-MIBI PS preoperatively. The CDHR-NUS was carried out by an expert medical sonographer. The results of the two methods were compared between each other and with the results of the operative act for the evaluation of accordance and diagnostic performances. RESULTS: PHPT is prevalently due to monoglandular pathology (SGD). The parallel use of CDHR-NUS and of 99mTc-MIBI PS does not determine a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy. The preoperative accordance evaluation between the two methods does not exclude the presence of multiglandular pathology (MGD) with certainty. CONCLUSIONS: CDHR-NUS is an accurate as well as cost-effective method; its role as a main and eventual unique preoperative localization method in patients affected by PHPT is confirmed. In the presence of expert medical sonographers, the sequential use of the two methods is retained correct and their use in parallel is neither justified nor cost-effective. The preoperative accordance evaluation between the two methods is neither necessary nor indispensable.
