Probenecid, an old ß-lactams pharmacokinetic enhancer for a renewed use: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Optimized antibiotic plasma predictor efficacy is essential in systemic infections. The uricosuric agent probenecid inhibits tubular excretion of antibiotics and may be used as ß-lactam pharmacokinetic enhancer (BLPKE), even though few data are currently available for this purpose. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric and retrospective observational study including all patients who received probenecid in combination with parenteral ß-lactam antibiotics for systemic infections from Jan 1, 2014 to Dec 31, 2019. Demographics, infection characteristics, treatment and ATC (antibiotics trough concentration) were investigated. RESULTS: All in all, 38 patients were included. Eight patients had a history of sickle cell disease. Hyperfiltration (defined as eGFR>130mL/min/1.73m2) was detected in twenty-one patients including six with sickle cell disease. Probenecid (500mg q6h orally) was added to antibiotics for a median (IQR) of 13 days (6.75-21.75), after a median (IQR) time lapse of 7 days (4-16) following the initiation of antibiotics. Probenecid was administered for low antibiotic trough concentration in 29 patients, for increased renal clearance in 5 patients and for persisting fever despite antibiotic therapy in 4 patients (including 1 infective relapse). A second plasma trough concentration, following probenecid administration, was available in 19 patients within a median (IQR) 3 days (2-5). Probenecid induced increased ATC in 18/19 patients (94.7%), with a median (IQR) change of +228.4% (IQR 38.7-633). No major adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Probenecid could be a BLPKE. Our data suggest this drug should be used more often to optimize ß-lactam pharmacokinetics in clinical practice.

Hospital compounding to face shortage: A case study of the development of a lopinavir-ritonavir oral suspension during the first wave of SARS-COV-2 in France.

The potential usefulness of lopinavir-ritonavir on Covid 19 infection during the first wave of contamination in France had boosted Kaletra® syrup prescription to the point of causing its national shortage. In the intensive care units of Parisian hospitals in charge of patients with life-threatening viral contamination, caregivers had to resort to lopinavir-ritonavir-based tablets, crushing them and then dispersing the powder in milk to facilitate administration by nasogastric tube. The difficulties and poor control of this degraded mode, which does not always ensure control of the amount of the drug in the prepared dose and may induce insufficient antiviral exposure, led us to develop in a very short time, while ensuring quality control proportional to the risk, a liquid form as an alternative to Kaletra® oral solution shortage. For this purpose, we describe this compounding formulation and its preparation process, while justifying the quality control strategy adapted to the risk as well as its chemical and physical stability. Based on the chemical and physical studies, the preparation was showed to be stable during at least 2 months between +2°C and +8°C and 1 week at room temperature. This has resulted in the design of kits that include multi-dose packaging and a measuring device and contain the appropriate quantities of drugs to ensure at least one week's treatment for each patient, during which time the kit in use can be stored at room temperature. The intensive care team used this treatment under conditions that they considered well adapted until the imported specialty became available.

Molecular testing for respiratory pathogens in sickle cell disease adult patients presenting with febrile acute chest syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating acute chest syndrome (ACS) from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is challenging in adults presenting with major sickle cell disease (SCD) (semiological similarity, rare microbiological documentation). We aimed to assess the usefulness of nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for respiratory pathogens, in combination with standard bacteriological investigations, in febrile ACS adult patients presenting with major SCD. METHODS: We performed a prospective, monocentric, observational study of 61 SCD adults presenting with febrile ACS from February 2015 to April 2016. Systematic blood, urine, and respiratory specimens were collected, before antibiotic initiation, for culture, urinary antigen tests, serology, and NAAT for respiratory pathogens. RESULTS: A pathogen was detected in 12 febrile ACS (19.7%): four viruses (6.6%) (Rhinovirus; Influenza A/B), seven bacteria (11.4%) (S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila, M. pneumoniae), one mixed infection (1.6%) (S. aureus and Influenza B). NAAT only detected L. pneumophila in one case (serogroup 2). Apart from a significantly shorter antibiotic therapy duration (6.1 vs. 7.8 days, P=0.045), no difference was observed between undocumented and microbiologically-documented febrile ACS. CONCLUSION: Using NAAT for the detection of respiratory pathogens in adults presenting with SCD slightly improved the microbiological diagnostic of febrile ACS, although respiratory infections are not the main etiological factor.

Severe atypical pneumonia in critically ill patients: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Chlamydophila pneumoniae (CP) and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) patients could require intensive care unit (ICU) admission for acute respiratory failure. METHODS: Adults admitted between 2000 and 2015 to 20 French ICUs with proven atypical pneumonia were retrospectively described. Patients with MP were compared to Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) pneumonia patients admitted to ICUs. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included, 71 men and 33 women, with a median age of 56 [44-67] years. MP was the causative agent for 76 (73%) patients and CP for 28 (27%) patients. Co-infection was documented for 18 patients (viruses for 8 [47%] patients). Median number of involved quadrants on chest X-ray was 2 [1-4], with alveolar opacities (n = 61, 75%), interstitial opacities (n = 32, 40%). Extra-pulmonary manifestations were present in 34 (33%) patients. Mechanical ventilation was required for 75 (72%) patients and vasopressors for 41 (39%) patients. ICU length of stay was 16.5 [9.5-30.5] days, and 11 (11%) patients died in the ICU. Compared with SP patients, MP patients had more extensive interstitial pneumonia, fewer pleural effusion, and a lower mortality rate [6 (8%) vs. 17 (22%), p = 0.013]. According MCA analysis, some characteristics at admission could discriminate MP and SP. MP was more often associated with hemolytic anemia, abdominal manifestations, and extensive chest radiograph abnormalities. SP-P was associated with shock, confusion, focal crackles, and focal consolidation. CONCLUSION: In this descriptive study of atypical bacterial pneumonia requiring ICU admission, mortality was 11%. The comparison with SP pneumonia identified clinical, laboratory, and radiographic features that may suggest MP or CP pneumonia.

The use of rituximab to prevent severe delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction in immunized patients with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR) is mainly caused by an immune response to transfused red blood cells (RBCs). Immunized patients have a high risk of producing antibodies in response to further transfusion. Controlling the immune response to RBCs is therefore a major goal in sickle cell disease (SCD). STUDY DESIGN: We report an observational study of eight alloimmunized SCD patients with history of severe DHTR who were treated with rituximab before a new transfusion to prevent further immunization and DHTR. RESULTS: Five patients showed a good clinical outcome following transfusion preceded by preemptive treatment with rituximab. The remaining patients presented mild DHTR. In all patients, the results of post-transfusion screening tests were identical to those of pretransfusion tests; no newly formed antibodies were detected. CONCLUSION: These cases suggest that rituximab prevents at least occurrence of newly formed antibodies in high responders and minimizes the risk of severe DHTR. This study confirms that DHTR is complex in SCD and does not rely only on the classical antigens/antibodies conflict. Considering potentially serious adverse effect of rituximab, this treatment should be considered cautiously, and only when transfusion is absolutely necessary in patients with history of severe DHTR linked to immunization.