Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Microorganisms ; 10(2)2022 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35208903

ABSTRACT

Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) isolates are a main cause of bloodstream infections. The aim of this study was to characterize 256 ß-lactam-resistant, bacteremia-causing E. coli isolates collected from 12 healthcare institutions in Lithuania in 2014 and 2018. All isolates were identified as E. coli via MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK ®2. In addition, the isolates were analyzed for the presence of 29 resistance genes and 13 virulence genes, divided into phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, and F), and characterized using rep-PCR genotyping methods (BOX-PCR and (GTG)5-PCR). Analyzing the results of this study showed tetA-strB-sul2-TEM-NDM-strA-fosA-AIM-sul3-aadA-CTX-M-9 to be the most common resistance gene combination (67.2% of all isolates). Additionally, the most common virulence genes established were fimH (98.4% of all isolates), fyuA (91.8%), and traT (81.3%) and the most common gene combination was fuyA-fimH-iroN (58.6% of all isolates). Next, the isolates were separated into four phylogenetic groups: A, B1, B2, and F, where group A isolates were detected at a significantly higher frequency (79.3% of all isolates). Finally, a total of 235 genotyping profiles were established using rep-PCR methods, and all profiles were separated into fourteen genotypic clusters, with each cluster containing profiles with a variety of virulence and resistance genes not restricted to any specific cluster. The results of this study elucidate E. coli antimicrobial resistance patterns by highlighting the variability and diversity of resistance and virulence genes and providing phylogenetic classification, genetic profiling, and clustering data. These results may improve clinical control of multidrug-resistant infections in healthcare institutions and contribute to the prevention of potential outbreaks.

2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(Suppl 2): 795, 2021 Sep 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34517843

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Country level policies and practices of testing and care for HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections are lagging behind European recommendations on integration across diseases. Building on previous experiences and evidence, the INTEGRATE Joint Action arranged four national stakeholder meetings. The aim was to foster cross-disciplinary and cross-disease collaborations at national level as a vehicle for strengthened integration of testing and care services. This article presents the methodology and discusses main outcomes and recommendations of these meetings. METHODS: Local partners in Croatia, Italy, Lithuania and Poland oversaw the planning, agenda development and identification of key persons to invite to ensure that meetings addressed main challenges and issues of the respective countries. Invited national stakeholders represented policy and public health institutions, clinical settings, testing sites and community organisations. National experts and experts from other European countries were invited as speakers and facilitators. Main topic discussed was how to increase integration across HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections in testing and care policies and practice; tuberculosis was also addressed in Lithuania and Italy. RESULTS: The agendas reflected national contexts and the meetings provided a forum to engage stakeholders knowledgeable of the national prevention, testing and care systems in interaction with international experts who shared experiences of the steps needed to achieve integration in policies and practice. The evaluations showed that participants found meetings relevant, important and beneficial for furthering integration. Of the respondents 78% agreed or strongly agreed that there was a good representation of relevant national stakeholders, and 78% that decision/action points were made on how to move the agenda forward. The importance of securing participation from high level national policy makers was highlighted. Outcomes were nationally tailored recommendations on integrated policies and strategies, diversification of testing strategies, stigma and discrimination, key populations, cost effectiveness, surveillance and funding. CONCLUSIONS: Shifting from single to multi-disease approaches require collaboration among a broad range of actors and national multi-stakeholder meetings have proven excellent to kick-start this. Face-to-face meetings of key stakeholders represent a unique opportunity to share cross-sectoral perspectives and experiences, identify gaps in national policies and practices and agree on required next steps.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hepatitis, Viral, Human , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Policy , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/diagnosis , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/epidemiology , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/prevention & control , Humans , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Social Stigma
3.
Life (Basel) ; 11(2)2021 Feb 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33669401

ABSTRACT

Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents plays an important role in the treatment of bacterial infections in healthcare institutions. The spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria can occur during inter- and intra-hospital transmissions among patients and hospital personnel. For this reason, more studies must be conducted to understand how resistance occurs in bacteria and how it moves between hospitals by comparing data from different years and looking out for any patterns that might emerge. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter spp. was studied at 14 healthcare institutions in Lithuania during 2014, 2016, and 2018 using samples from human bloodstream infections. In total, 194 isolates were collected and identified using MALDI-TOF and VITEK2 analyzers as Acinetobacter baumannii group bacteria. After that, the isolates were analyzed for the presence of different resistance genes (20 genes were analyzed) and characterized by using the Rep-PCR and MLVA (multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis) genotyping methods. The results of the study showed the relatedness of the different Acinetobacter spp. isolates and a possible circulation of resistance genes or profiles during the different years of the study. This study provides essential information, such as variability and diversity of resistance genes, genetic profiling, and clustering of isolates, to better understand the antimicrobial resistance patterns of Acinetobacter spp. These results can be used to strengthen the control of multidrug-resistant infections in healthcare institutions and to prevent potential outbreaks of this pathogen in the future.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...