A Revised Definition of Left Bundle Branch Block Using Time to Notch in Lead I.

Importance: Current left bundle branch block (LBBB) criteria are based on animal experiments or mathematical models of cardiac tissue conduction and may misclassify patients. Improved criteria would impact referral decisions and device type for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Objective: To develop a simple new criterion for LBBB based on electrophysiological studies of human patients, and then to validate this criterion in an independent population. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study, the derivation cohort was from a single-center, prospective study of patients undergoing electrophysiological study from March 2016 through November 2019. The validation cohort was assembled by retrospectively reviewing medical records for patients from the same center who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) from October 2015 through May 2022. Exposures: Patients were classified as having LBBB or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) as assessed by intracardiac recording. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of the electrocardiography (ECG) criteria assessed in patients with LBBB or IVCD. Results: A total of 75 patients (median [IQR] age, 63 [53-70.5] years; 21 [28.0%] female) with baseline LBBB on 12-lead ECG underwent intracardiac recording of the left ventricular septum: 48 demonstrated complete conduction block (CCB) and 27 demonstrated intact Purkinje activation (IPA). Analysis of surface ECGs revealed that late notches in the QRS complexes of lateral leads were associated with CCB (40 of 48 patients [83.3%] with CCB vs 13 of 27 patients [48.1%] with IPA had a notch or slur in lead I; P = .003). Receiver operating characteristic curves for all septal and lateral leads were constructed, and lead I displayed the best performance with a time to notch longer than 75 milliseconds. Used in conjunction with the criteria for LBBB from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society, this criterion had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI, 56%-83%) and specificity of 74% (95% CI, 54%-89%) in the derivation population, contrasting with a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 86%-99%) and specificity of 33% (95% CI, 17%-54%) for the Strauss criteria. In an independent validation cohort of 46 patients (median [IQR] age, 78.5 [70-84] years; 21 [45.7%] female) undergoing TAVR with interval development of new LBBB, the time-to-notch criterion demonstrated a sensitivity of 87% (95% CI, 74%-95%). In the subset of 10 patients with preprocedural IVCD, the criterion correctly distinguished IVCD from LBBB in all cases. Application of the Strauss criteria performed similarly in the validation cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that time to notch longer than 75 milliseconds in lead I is a simple ECG criterion that, when used in conjunction with standard LBBB criteria, may improve specificity for identifying patients with LBBB from conduction block. This may help inform patient selection for cardiac resynchronization or conduction system pacing.

A Perplexing Case of Bladder Mass Biopsy-Proven Neurosarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ systemic disease that presents with several clinical manifestations, and patients can develop neurologic complications. Neurosarcoidosis may be life-threatening; therefore, early recognition and treatment are key. Here, we present a case of a 55-year-old African American male who presented with a complaint of dizziness and left-sided weakness; he ultimately received a diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis after elaborate radiographic investigations and bladder mass biopsy. Neurosarcoidosis remains a diagnostic dilemma as it can clinically and radiographically mimic multiple conditions including multiple sclerosis, central nervous system lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Intramyocardial mapping of ventricular premature depolarizations via septal venous perforators: Differentiating the superior intraseptal region from left ventricular summit origins.

BACKGROUND: The intramyocardial aspect of the left ventricular summit (LVS) can be mapped by advancing a unipolar guidewire into septal perforator branches of the anterior interventricular vein. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to differentiate between ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) with a basal superior intraseptal (SIS) site of origin and those originating from the epicardial LVS using septal intramyocardial mapping. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with suspected LVS VPDs who underwent SIS unipolar mapping were reviewed for their clinical characteristics, mapping findings, and procedural outcomes. RESULTS: SIS mapping was successful in 44 of 47 cases (93.6%). VPD origin was SIS (defined as earliest activation from the intraseptal wire) in 20 patients (45.5%; median 23 ms pre-QRS). Procedure success was similar in patients with (group 1) and without (group 2) SIS origin (84% vs 87.5%, respectively; P = .842). Of the 10 patients in group 1 without presystolic endocardial activation, 5 (11.3% of all 44 cases) were successfully ablated from the left ventricular endocardium by using an anatomical approach targeting the endocardium closest to the earliest intraseptal activation site. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion (45.5%) of VPDs that appear to arise from the left ventricular summit can be demonstrated to have a SIS origin using septal perforator venous mapping. A significant minority (11.3%) of these can be ablated from the endocardium by targeting from an anatomic vantage point closest to the earliest intraseptal activation site. The described strategy may help differentiate true LVS VPDs from those with SIS sites of origin.