ABSTRACT
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2), caused by a CAG expansion (CAGexp) at ATXN2, has a complex clinical picture. While validated ataxia scales are available, comprehensive instruments to measure all SCA2 neurological manifestations are required. This study aims to validate the Neurological Examination Score for the assessment of Spinocerebellar Ataxias (NESSCA) to be used in SCA2 and to compare its responsiveness to those obtained with other instruments. NESSCA, SARA, SCAFI, and CCFS scales were applied in symptomatic SCA2 patients. Correlations were done with age at onset, disease duration, CAGexp, and between scales. Responsiveness was estimated by comparing deltas of stable to worse patients after 12 months, according to Patient Global Impression of change, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve of scores range. Eighty-eight evaluations (49 patients) were obtained. NESSCA had an even distribution and correlated with disease duration (r = 0.55), SARA (r = 0.63), and CAGexp (rho = 0.32): both explained 44% of NESSCA variance. Deltas (95% CI) after 1 year in stable and worse patients were only significantly different for SARA. NESSCA, SARA, SCAFI, and CCFS AUC were 0.63, 0.81, 0.49, and 0.48, respectively. NESSCA is valid to be used in SCA2. However, the only instrument that presented good responsiveness to change in 1 year was SARA. We suggest that NESSCA can be used as a secondary outcome in future trials in SCA2 due to the burden of neurological disabilities related to disease progression.
Subject(s)
Neurologic Examination , Severity of Illness Index , Spinocerebellar Ataxias/diagnosis , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Area Under Curve , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heterozygote , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Spinocerebellar Ataxias/genetics , Spinocerebellar Ataxias/physiopathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although aspiration is one of the main causes of death in SCA, such as SCA3/Machado Joseph disease (SCA3/MJD), clinical studies on dysphagia are lacking for these diseases. The aims of this study were to characterize dysphagia in SCA3/MJD through videofluoroscopy (VF) of swallowing, correlate VF with disease severity criteria and weight loss, and determine the clinical criteria cutoffs for performing VF in the clinical routine, in order to detect aspiration. METHODS: A cross-sectional study on 34 SCA3/MJD patients was performed. Clinical and molecular data, as well as body mass index (BMI), were obtained. Neurological scales, such as the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), and the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire were applied. The VF scores, Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) and penetration/aspiration scale (PAS), were obtained: Moderate-to-severe scores were grouped as "significant dysphagia." RESULTS: Overall, 31 of 34 individuals showed abnormal scores at VF. SARA, BMI, and the domain "eating duration" of SWAL-QOL correlated with VF: Their relation to significant dysphagia (DOSS <4 points or PAS >3) was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic curves. A sensitivity of 100% was equivalent to a cutoff of 15 points on SARA score, 23.72 kg/m2 on BMI, and 60% on eating duration-SWAL-QOL (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Significant dysphagia was not related to age at onset, disease duration, or CAG repeat expansion, but with SARA scores, lower BMI, and the domain eating duration of SWAL-QOL. As a guideline for preventing aspiration, we suggest that SARA scores greater than 15 or eating duration-SWAL-QOL lower than 60% should urge VF studies in SCA3/MJD.