ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Significant changes in the management of acute pancreatitis have taken place since the 2004 Pamplona Consensus Conference. The objective of this conference has been the revision and updating of the Conference recommendations, in order to unify the integral management of potentially severe acute pancreatitis in an ICU. PARTICIPANTS: Spanish and international intensive medicine physicians, radiologists, surgeons, gastroenterologists, emergency care physicians and other physicians involved in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE AND GRADES OF RECOMMENDATION: The GRADE method has been used for drawing them up. DRAWING UP THE RECOMMENDATIONS: The selection of the committee members was performed by means of a public announcement. The bibliography has been revised from 2004 to the present day and 16 blocks of questions on acute pancreatitis in a ICU have been drawn up. Firstly, all the questions according to groups have been drawn up in order to prepare one document. This document has been debated and agreed upon by computer at the SEMICYUC Congress and lastly at the Consensus Conference which was held with the sole objective of drawing up these recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Eighty two recommendations for acute pancreatitis management in an ICU have been presented. Of these 84 recommendations, we would emphasize the new determinants-based classification of acute pancreatitis severity, new surgical techniques and nutritional recommendations. Note. This summary only lists the 84 recommendations of the 16 questions blocks except blocks greater relevance and impact of its novelty or because they modify the current management.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Pancreatitis/diagnosis , Pancreatitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Hemodiafiltration , Humans , Pancreatitis/classification , Pancreatitis/surgeryABSTRACT
There is a growing body of evidence that early management of patients with acute pancreatitis may alter the natural course of disease and improve outcomes of patients. The aim of this paper is to optimize the management of patients with acute pancreatitis during the first 72 h after hospital admission by proposing several clinical care pathways. The proposed pathways are based on the SEMICYUC 2005 Recommendations with incorporation of the latest developments in the field, particularly the determinants-based classification of acute pancreatitis severity. The pathways also incorporate the "alarm signs", the use of therapeutic modalities known as PANCREAS, and the "call to ICU" criteria. Further studies will need to assess whether the adoption of these pathway reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with acute pancreatitis. The previous SEMICYUC guidelines on management of patients with acute pancreatitis in Intensive Care will need to be revised to reflect the recent developments in the field.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Critical Pathways , Pancreatitis/therapy , Acute Disease , Algorithms , Analgesia , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Combined Modality Therapy , Critical Care/methods , Disease Management , Enteral Nutrition , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension/etiology , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Necrosis , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatitis/classification , Pancreatitis/diagnosis , Pancreatitis/pathology , Pancreatitis/surgery , Patient Care Team , Severity of Illness Index , Societies, Medical , SpainABSTRACT
Varón de 78 años, con antecedentes de hipertensión arterial y diabetes mellitus, remitido a urgencias desde su residencia por deterioro del estado general y caídas frecuentes en la última semana. Dos semanas antes precisó sondaje vesical, que fue traumático y de forma profiláctica se prescribió ciprofloxacino. En la exploración física destaca desorientación, TA90/40mmHg, frecuencia cardíaca 120lpm, T.a 37,3 1C, 24 respiraciones por minuto y dolor a la palpación en hipocondrio izquierdo. En el electrocardiograma se objetiva taquicardia sinusal. Al canalizar la vía periférica se nos pregunta: ¿le saco hemocultivos?(AU)
A 78-year-old man was refrerred from his residency where he lives to the emergency division due to general deterioration and frequent falls in the last week. His personal history is remarkable for arterial hypertension and diabetes. Two weeks before he needed a vesical catheterism that was traumatic and profilactic ciprofloxacin was prescriped. On phisical exploration he appears desoriented, blodd pressure is 9/40mmHg, cardiac rythm 120 beats per minute, temperature 37,3°C and 24 respirations per minute. He appears to have pain on his upper left abdomen cuadrant. When the nurse gets a peripheral vein she asks, ¿should I obtain hemocultures?(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Fever/complications , Fever/diagnosis , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Sepsis/complications , Sepsis/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Bacteremia/complications , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Hypertension/complications , Electrocardiography , Comorbidity , Asepsis/methodsABSTRACT
A 78-year-old man was referred from his residency where he lives to the emergency division due to general deterioration and frequent falls in the last week. His personal history is remarkable for arterial hypertension and diabetes. Two weeks before he needed a vesical catheterism that was traumatic and profilactic ciprofloxacin was prescribed. On physical exploration he appears disoriented, blood pressure is 9/40 mm Hg, cardiac rythm 120 beats per minute, temperature 37,3 °C and 24 respirations per minute. He appears to have pain on his upper left abdomen cuadrant. When the nurse gets a peripheral vein she asks, ¿should I obtain hemocultures?