Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 46(3): 771-81, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11277224

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to establish a comprehensive set of backscatter factors for mammography based on the exposure model proposed by the European Protocol on Dosimetry in Mammography. The Monte Carlo calculated backscatter factors (BSFs) presented in this study are for various exposure conditions encountered in mammographic practice as well as in calibration procedures. The data demonstrate the variation of the BSF as a function of the exposure parameters, hence enabling a better match with calibration conditions and, at the same time, reviewing the BSF data already recommended by the European Protocol. Furthermore, earlier data for BSF for general diagnostic radiology are validated.


Subject(s)
Mammography , Phantoms, Imaging , Calibration , Europe , Female , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Scattering, Radiation
2.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 50(3): 573-7, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10070716

ABSTRACT

The precision of the thermoluminescent response of Harshaw micro-cube dosimeters (TLD-100), evaluated in both Harshaw thermoluminescent readers 5500 and 3500, for 1 Gy dose value, was investigated. The mean reproducibility for micro-cubes, pre-readout annealed at 100 degrees C for 15 min, evaluated with the manual planchet reader 3500, is 0.61% (1 standard deviation). When micro-cubes are evaluated with the automated hot-gas reader 5500, reproducibility values are undoubtedly worse, mean reproducibility for numerically stabilised dosimeters being equal to 3.27% (1 standard deviation). These results indicate that the reader model 5500, or, at least, the instrument used for the present measurements, is not adequate for micro-cube evaluation, if precise and accurate dosimetry is required. The difference in precision is apparently due to geometry inconsistencies in the orientation of the imperfect micro-cube faces during readout, requiring careful and manual reproducible arrangement of the selected micro-cube faces in contact with the manual reader planchet.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Dosage , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL