Konservative versus chirurgische Therapie beim idiopathischen und sekundären Megakolon oder Megarektum im Erwachsenenalter - eine retrospektive multizentrische Kontrollstudie.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic and secondary megacolon (MC) and megarectum (MR) in adults is associated with persistent bowel dilatation and reduced intestinal motility. Little is known about the optimal treatment of this rare disease. Therefore, we retrospectively analysed long-term data from these patients in 5 community and university hospitals, focusing on conservative versus surgical treatment. METHODS: Patient records from 7/2004 to 9/2021 were screened for colorectal diseases with severe constipation and persistent megacolon ≥ 9.0 cm and/or megarectum ≥ 6.5 cm. Follow up-data was collected through telephone interviews and written surveys. ClinicalTrialsgov NCT04340856. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with idiopathic (n=10) and secondary (n=57) MC or MR were identified with only 20 of 67 patients (29.9%) correctly diagnosed. Mean/median age was 64/69 (range 18-93) years. Thirty-two patients were treated with laxative regimens, and 35 underwent surgery (colostomy: n=12, segmental resection, or hemicolectomy: n=10, (sub)total colectomy: n= 13) after conservative treatment attempts in 32/35 (91.4%). The mean/median follow-up was 4.2/2.7 (range 0.1-17.0) years. The readmission rate for MC-associated symptoms was significantly higher after conservative treatment than after surgical therapy at 12 (0.84 vs. 0.36 per patient, p=0.036), 24 (1.00 vs. 0.52, p=0.048) and 36 (1.13 vs. 0.58, p=0.047) months, as was the number of patients with persistent laxative dependence (28/32 (87.5%) vs. 19/33 (57.6%); p = 0.007). Therapy-associated adverse events (Clavien-Dindo classification) were documented more often in surgically treated patients (11/35, 31.4%) (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment may be considered earlier if idiopathic or secondary MC or MR is correctly diagnosed, and conservative treatment has been attempted.

[Feasibility and structural prerequisites for conversion to outpatient treatment in proctology]. / Machbarkeit und Strukturvoraussetzungen in der Ambulantisierung der Proktologie.

BACKGROUND: Despite the introduction of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system, costs in the German healthcare system have risen continuously for years. In order to reduce costs the federal government is aiming to shift inpatient services to the outpatient sector. Outpatient services affect many areas of medicine, including proctological operations as these are common and can often be carried out on an outpatient basis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present work is to discuss which areas of proctology are suitable for outpatient treatment and which structural requirements are necessary. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present article is intended to provide a narrative overview with reference to the literature on the topic of outpatient care in proctology. A literature search was carried out using the following keywords: outpatient care, selective sector-level remuneration, day care, proctological operations, AOP catalog and hybrid DRG. RESULTS: In proctology, outpatient surgical care is implementable in many cases; however, not every patient is suitable for this. In addition to previous illnesses, patient compliance and the possibility of postoperative care from relatives must also be taken into account. In addition, emergency treatment must be guaranteed. Contraindications include severe heart and circulatory diseases as well as severe coagulation or organ dysfunction. Extensive abscesses, complex fistulas or sphincter reconstructions should be surgically treated in an inpatient setting. The prerequisite for successful outpatient care is to make the sector boundaries between outpatient and inpatient patient care more permeable and to adequately remunerate the interventions. CONCLUSION: In addition to the surgical indications, the prerequisites for successful proctological operations are the correct assessment of the operational capability and compliance. From an organizational and economic perspective, better networking between outpatient and inpatient treatment and equal remuneration across the sector boundaries are crucial.

PDCD10 promotes the tumor-supporting functions of TGF-ß in pancreatic cancer.

The progression of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is significantly affected by transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß but targeting TGF-ß can also compromize physiological effects in patients. Our study examined the functions of the ubiquitously expressed protein, PDCD10, as a modulator of TGF-ß signaling in PDAC. Using in silico analyses we found that in patient samples, PDCD10 is significantly higher expressed in PDAC tumor tissue compared with normal pancreas and it is highly correlated with reduced survival. We created stable KO's of PDCD10 in two PDAC lines, PaTu 8902 (SMAD4 +/+) and PaTu 8988t (SMAD4 -/-), and found that KO lines are more sensitive to 5-FU and Gemcitabine treatment than their wild-type counterparts. Performing viability and wound closure assays we further found that PDCD10 promotes cell survival and proliferation by enhancing specifically the mitogenic functions of TGF-ß. The molecular mechanism underlying this effect was further investigated using Western blots and with primary organoid lines derived from patient PDAC tissue samples. The data imply that PDCD10 mediates an increase in p-ERK through a non-SMAD4 pathway, leading to EMT promotion. Furthermore, PDCD10 facilitates deactivation of RB via a SMAD4-dependent pathway, thereby counter-acting the anti-proliferative actions of TGF-ß. By performing proximity ligation assays (PLA) we found that PDCD10 associates with the kinase MST4, translocates it intracellularly and thereby facilitates phosphorylations of RB and ERK1/2. Our study indicates that PDCD10 promotes the proliferative function and EMT induction of TGF-ß in pancreatic cancer cells. Therefore, targeting PDCD10 in PDAC patients could represent a promising new strategy to optimize TGF-ß targeted therapies.

The impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection, a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic stenosis (AS) is a common complication after colorectal resection. However, the predisposing factors for stricture formation are not fully understood. Previous studies have shown anastomotic leakage (AL) to be a risk factor for the occurrence of AS. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of anastomotic leakage characteristics on the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis after colorectal resection. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AL following elective, sphincter preserving, colorectal resection, with or without diversion ostomy, between January 2009 and March 2023 were identified from a prospectively collected database. The characteristics of the anastomotic leakage, patient baseline and operative characteristics as well as the postoperative outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with the occurrence of post-leakage AS. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients developed AL and met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 28 (21.7%) patients were diagnosed with post-leakage AS. There was a significantly higher frequency of patients with neoadjuvant radiotherapy (18% vs 3%; p = .026) and hand-sewn anastomoses (39% vs 17%; p = .011) within the AS group. Furthermore, the extent of the anastomotic defect was significantly higher in the AS group compared with the non-AS group (50%, IQR 27-71 vs. 20%, IQR 9-40, p = 0.011). Similar findings were observed between the study groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, medical comorbidities, diagnosis, surgical procedure, surgical approach (open vs. minimally invasive), and anastomotic fashioning (side-to-end vs. end-to-end). On multivariate analysis, the extent of the anastomotic defect (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p = 0.034) and hand-sewn anastomoses (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.01-6.98; p = 0.043) were confirmed as independent risk factors for post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the occurrence of post-leakage AS and the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or the management of AL. Time to ostomy reversal was significantly longer in the AS group (202d, IQR 169-275 vs. 318d IQR 192-416, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The extent of the anastomotic defect and hand-sewn anastomoses were confirmed as independent risk factors for the occurrence of post-leakage AS. No correlation could be observed between the ISREC grading of AL, the anastomotic height or AL management, and the occurrence of post-leakage AS.

[Gender-specific differences in bariatric surgery: epidemiology, treatment and results]. / Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede in der Adipositaschirurgie: Epidemiologie, Therapie und Ergebnisse.

This study investigates gender-specific differences in obesity and the treatment by metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). The database includes 2393 patients (1725 women, 668 men) from for a high-volume center for bariatric surgery. Demographic, perioperative and follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. Men had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) and more frequent obesity-associated diseases. Despite the higher prevalence of obesity in men, women accounted for 80% of the surgical patients. On average men had longer operation times but with the same complication rates. Postoperatively, both sexes experienced a significant reduction in excess body weight, which was slightly more pronounced in women. The study particularly emphasizes the need to better motivate men to undergo obesity treatment in order to reduce the health consequences of morbid obesity in this population group.

Feasibility and usefulness of postoperative mobilization goals in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) clinical pathway for elective colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Despite mobilization is highly recommended in the ERAS® colorectal guideline, studies suggest that more than half of patients don't reach the daily goal of 360 min out of bed. However, data used to quantify mobilization are predominantly based on self-assessments, for which the accuracy is uncertain. This study aims to accurately measure postoperative mobilization in ERAS®-patients by validated motion data from body sensors. METHODS: ERAS®-patients with elective bowel resections were eligible. Self-assessments and motion sensors (movisens: ECG-Move 4 and Move 4; Garmin: Vivosmart4) were used to record mobilization parameter from surgery to postoperative day 3 (POD3): Time out of bed, time on feet and step count. RESULTS: 97 patients were screened and 60 included for study participation. Self-assessment showed a median out of bed duration of 215 min/day (POD1: 135 min, POD2: 225 min, POD3: 225 min). The goal of 360 min was achieved by 16.67% at POD1, 21.28% at POD2 and 20.45% at POD3. Median time on feet objectively measured by Move 4 was 109 min/day. During self-assessment, patients significantly underestimated their "time on feet"-duration with 85 min/day (p = 0.008). Median number of steps was 933/day (Move 4). CONCLUSION: This study confirmed with objectively supported data, that most patients don't reach the daily mobilization goal of 360 min despite being treated by an ERAS®-pathway with ERAS®-nurse. Even considering an empirically approximated underestimation, the ERAS®-target isn't achieved by more than 75% of patients. Therefore, we propose an adjustment of the general ERAS®-goals into more patient-centered, individualized and achievable goals. REGISTRATION: This study is part of the MINT-ERAS-project and was registered prospectively in the German Clinical Trials Register on 25.02.2022. Trial registration number is "DRKS00027863".

Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver malignancies (ROC'N'ROLL): a single-centre, randomised, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial.

Background: Robotic hepatectomy (RH) has been increasingly adopted for the treatment of liver malignancies despite lacking evidence from randomised trials. We aimed to determine the effect of RH compared to laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) on quality of life in patients undergoing minimally invasive hepatectomy for liver malignancies. Methods: This single-blinded, randomised trial was conducted at a tertiary care academic centre (DRKS00027531). Patients with resectable liver malignancies were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to either RH or LH with stratification by type of malignancy and difficulty of resection. Patients were blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the mean quality of life within 90 days after surgery, measured with the role functioning scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included operating time, morbidity, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative recovery, and resection margin status. Findings: Between February 21, 2022, and Sep 18, 2023, 80 patients (RH: n = 41, LH: n = 39) were included and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Role functioning scores did not differ between RH and LH (mean [SD], 74.3 [23.3] versus 79.6 [22.3]; mean difference -5.3, 95% CI -15.6 to 5.1, p = 0.547). The comprehensive complication index was not significantly different between the study groups (8.9 [23.1] versus 15.5 [23.9], p = 0.137). There were no differences in other perioperative outcomes. Interpretation: RH yielded similar outcomes in quality of life and can be considered a safe alternative to LH. Funding: None.

The Effect of Revascularization on Lower Limb Circulation Parameters in Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Background: The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and the number of revascularization procedures performed in symptomatic patients are steadily increasing. However, uncertainties remain regarding hemodynamic monitoring after revascularization and the prediction of clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate hemodynamic parameters with a focus on the microvasculature. Methods: This prospective, single-center study included 29 patients (15 with intermittent claudication [IC] and 14 with chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]). Before and after the revascularization procedure, in addition to the ankle-brachial index (ABI), microperfusion parameters, including microvascular blood flow, capillary oxygen saturation (SO2), and relative hemoglobin content (rHb), were assessed with lightguide spectrophotometry combined with laser Doppler flowmetry using an oxygen-to-see (O2C) device in the horizontal and elevated leg positions. Results: At baseline, SO2 in the elevated leg position was significantly lower in patients with CLTI than in those with IC (p = 0.0189), whereas the other microcirculatory parameters and ABI values were not significantly different. Patients with diabetes mellitus had a higher flow rate than those without in the horizontal leg position (p = 0.0162) but not in the elevated leg position. After successful revascularization, the flow increased immediately and significantly in both positions, whereas SO2, rHb, and the ABI did not. Conclusions: Elevated leg SO2 was significantly lower in CLTI than in clinically compensated peripheral arterial disease, whereas microvascular flow was a suitable surrogate parameter indicating successful revascularization. In studies using surgical or interventional revascularization procedures, noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of the microcirculation at the foot level might be beneficial.

Study protocol for a non-inferiority, multicenter, randomized study to evaluate a smartphone app-based follow-up program after bariatric surgery (BELLA plus trial).

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to follow-up (FU) care after bariatric surgery is poor despite strong recommendations. In our pilot Bella trial, we demonstrated that a completely remote follow-up program via smartphone is feasible and safe for patients after bariatric surgery. Building on this, we aim to verify our results in a multicenter, randomized controlled setting. METHODS: This trial plans to enroll 410 participants undergoing primary bariatric surgery in seven German bariatric centers. Participants are randomized into two groups: a control group receiving in-person FU according to the standard in the bariatric centers, and an interventional group monitored using a smartphone application (app). The app sends standardized questionnaires and reminders regarding regular vitamin intake and exercises. The built-in messaging function enables patients to communicate remotely with medical care professionals. After one year, all participants are evaluated at their primary bariatric centers. The primary outcome is weight loss 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes include obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life, serum values of vitamins and minerals, body impedance analysis, visits to the emergency department or readmission, patient compliance, and medical staff workload. DISCUSSION: The current study is the first prospective, individually randomized-controlled, multicenter trial where a mobile application completely replaces traditional in-person visits for post-bariatric surgery follow-ups in bariatric centers.

A Modified Switching Procedure from Temporary to Tunneled Central Venous Dialysis Catheters.

Background: Tunneled central venous catheters are commonly used for dialysis in patients without a functional permanent vascular access. In an emergent setting, a non-tunneled, temporary central venous catheter is often placed for immediate dialysis. The most critical step in the catheter insertion is venipuncture, which is often a major cause for longer intervention times and procedure-related adverse events. To avoid this critical step when placing a more permanent tunneled catheter, an exchange over a previously placed temporary one can be considered. In this paper, we present a modified switching approach with a separate access site. Methods: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective database, we examined whether this modified technique is non-inferior to a de novo application. Therefore, we included all 396 patients who received their first tunneled dialysis catheter at our site from March 2018 to March 2023. Out of these, 143 patients received the modified approach and 253 the standard de novo ultrasound-guided puncture and insertion. Then, the outcomes of the two groups, including adverse events and infections, were compared by nonparametric tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: In both groups, the implantations were 100% successful. Catheter explantation due to infection according to CDC criteria was necessary in 18 cases, with no difference between the groups (5.0% vs. 4.4% p = 0.80). The infection rate per 100 days was 0.113 vs. 0.106 in the control group, with a comparable spectrum of bacteria. A total of 12 catheters (3 vs. 9) had to be removed due to a periinterventional complication. An early-onset infection was the reason in two cases (1.3%) in the study group and five in the control group (1.9%). A total misplacement of the catheter occurred in two cases only in the control group. After adjustment for potential confounders via multivariable logistic regression there was not a significant difference in the complication rate (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.14-2.03, p = 0.351) but an estimated decreased risk overall based on the average treatment effect of -1.7% in favor of the study group. Conclusions: The present study shows that a catheter exchange leads to no more infections than a de novo placement; hence, it is a feasible method. Moreover, misplacements and control chest X-rays to exclude pneumothorax after venipuncture were completely avoided by exchanging. This approach yields a much lower infection rate than previous reports: 1.3% compared to 2.7% in all existing aggregated studies. The presented approach seems to be superior to existing switching methods. Overall, an exchange can also help to preserve veins for future access, since the same jugular vein is used.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in peripheral blood as predictive biomarkers in patients with solid tumors undergoing immune checkpoint therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Immunotherapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, are increasingly recognized for their potential. Despite notable successes, patient responses to these treatments vary significantly. The absence of reliable predictive and prognostic biomarkers hampers the ability to foresee outcomes. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the predictive significance of circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy, focusing on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed and EMBASE from January 2007 to November 2023, utilizing keywords related to MDSC and ICI. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) directly from the publications or calculated them based on the reported data. A hazard ratio greater than 1 indicated a beneficial effect of low MDSC levels. We assessed heterogeneity and effect size through subgroup analyses. Results: Our search yielded 4,023 articles, of which 17 studies involving 1,035 patients were included. The analysis revealed that patients with lower levels of circulating MDSC experienced significantly improved OS (HR=2.13 [95% CI 1.51-2.99]) and PFS (HR=1.87 [95% CI 1.29-2.72]) in response to ICI therapy. Notably, heterogeneity across these outcomes was primarily attributed to differences in polymorphonuclear MDSC (PMN-MDSC) subpopulations and varying cutoff methodologies used in the studies. The monocytic MDSC (M-MDSC) subpopulation emerged as a consistent and significant prognostic marker across various subgroup analyses, including ethnicity, tumor type, ICI target, sample size, and cutoff methodology. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that standardized assessment of MDSC, particularly M-MDSC, should be integral to ICI therapy strategies. These cells hold the promise of identifying patients at risk of poor response to ICI therapy, enabling tailored treatment approaches. Further research focusing on the standardization of markers and validation of cutoff methods is crucial for integrating MDSC into clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023420095, identifier CRD42023420095.

Remote ischemic preconditioning versus sham-control for prevention of anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer (RIPAL trial): a pilot randomized controlled, triple-blinded monocenter trial.

PURPOSE: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reportedly reduces ischemia‒reperfusion injury (IRI) in various organ systems. In addition to tension and technical factors, ischemia is a common cause of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal resection. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the potentially protective effect of RIPC on anastomotic healing and to determine the effect size to facilitate the development of a subsequent confirmatory trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with rectal cancer (RC) who underwent anterior resection were enrolled in this prospectively registered (DRKS0001894) pilot randomized controlled triple-blinded monocenter trial at the Department of Surgery, University Medicine Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, between 10/12/2019 and 19/06/2022. The primary endpoint was AL within 30 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints were perioperative morbidity and mortality, reintervention, hospital stay, readmission and biomarkers of ischemia‒reperfusion injury (vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF) and cell death (high mobility group box 1 protein, HMGB1). RIPC was induced through three 10-min cycles of alternating ischemia and reperfusion to the upper extremity. RESULTS: Of the 207 patients assessed, 153 were excluded, leaving 54 patients to be randomized to the RIPC or the sham-RIPC arm (27 each per arm). The mean age was 61 years, and the majority of patients were male (37:17 (68.5:31.5%)). Most of the patients underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (29/54 (53.7%)) for adenocarcinoma (52/54 (96.3%)). The primary endpoint, AL, occurred almost equally frequently in both arms (RIPC arm: 4/25 (16%), sham arm: 4/26 (15.4%), p = 1.000). The secondary outcomes were comparable except for a greater rate of reintervention in the sham arm (9 (6-12) vs. 3 (1-5), p = 0.034). The median duration of endoscopic vacuum therapy was shorter in the RIPC arm (10.5 (10-11) vs. 38 (24-39) days, p = 0.083), although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A clinically relevant protective effect of RIPC on anastomotic healing after rectal resection cannot be assumed on the basis of these data.

Motivational Interviewing improves postoperative nutrition goals within the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) pathway in elective bowel surgery - A randomized clinical pilot trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Exploration whether Motivational Interviewing (MI) could be learned and implemented with ease within a surgical in-hospital setting and whether participation in the intervention led to significantly higher compliance with ERAS®-recommended protein intake goals. The individual healing process of many patients is delayed because they fail to cover their calorie requirement, which could be counteracted by a patient-centered conversational intervention that is new in perioperative practice. METHODS: This patient-blinded pilot-RCT included 60 patients (≥18 years) following the certified ERAS® bowel protocol for colorectal surgery between March and August 2022. Five perioperative MI interventions were conducted by two health employees certified to perform MI. Key endpoints were the number of protein shakes drunk, calories of proteins ingested and overall calorie intake. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients (34 men [56.7%]; mean [SD] age, 60.7 [13.3] years) were randomized. MI patient-group had significantly higher protein shake intake on all postoperative days except day 3. For days 0-3 MI group drank significantly more shakes overall (median 5.5 vs. 2.0; P = 0.004) and consumed more calories (median 1650.0 vs. 600.0 kcal; P = 0.004) and proteins (median 110.0 vs. 40.0 g; P = 0.005). Total calorie intake for each day by shakes and dietary intake was significantly higher in the MI-intervention group on day 2 (mean 1772.3 vs. 1358.9 kcal; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: MI may contribute to improve compliance with nutritional goals in the certified ERAS® protocol by increasing protein and calorie intake. The findings suggest further investigation of MI to help patients achieve their perioperative nutrition goals in different clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS - Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; DRKS-ID: DRKS00027863; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027863.

Robotic sectionectomy versus robotic hemihepatectomy for anatomic liver resection: a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Sectionectomy is a parenchma-sparing alternative to (extended) right or left hemihepatectomy. However, the effectiveness and safety of robotic sectionectomy (RS) versus robotic (extended) hemihepatectomy (RH) for the treatment of liver tumors remains unclear. We reviewed our prospective database for consecutive patients who had undergone robotic hepatectomies between March 2021 and July 2023 and included all patients with RS and RH. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes were analyzed and compared between both groups. Thirty patients met our inclusion criteria, of whom 16 patients underwent RS as opposed to 14 patients who underwent RH. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The duration of Pringle maneuver was significantly longer in the RS group, while the remaining operative details were comparable. There were no significant differences in posthepatectomy outcomes between the study groups. All patients had negative resection margins. RS is a safe and effective parenchyma-sparing treatment modality.

Current Trends and Advancements in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health burden with a high mortality rate. Over the past 40 years, significant progress has been achieved in the prevention and management of HCC. SUMMARY: Hepatitis B vaccination programs, the development of direct acting antiviral drugs for Hepatitis C, and effective surveillance strategies provide a profound basis for the prevention of HCC. Advanced surgery and liver transplantation along with local ablation techniques potentially offer cure for the disease. Also, just recently, the introduction of immunotherapy opened a new chapter in systemic treatment. Finally, the introduction of the BCLC classification system for HCC, clearly defining patient groups and assigning reasonable treatment options, has standardized treatment and become the basis of almost all clinical trials for HCC. With this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of HCC management and also touch on current challenges. KEY MESSAGE: A comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach is crucial for effective HCC management. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to further enhance treatment options and will ultimately reduce the global burden of this devastating disease.