ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Descrever o perfil acadêmico, a experiência em pesquisa, as crenças e a autoeficácia em pesquisa dos enfermeiros clínicos de um hospital em Jornada Magnet®. MÉTODOS: Estudo descritivo, tipo survey, para avaliar perfil acadêmico, experiência em pesquisa, crenças e habilidades de pesquisa dos enfermeiros clínicos. A análise foi dividida em características demográficas; perfil acadêmico/científico (titulação acadêmica, participação em grupos de pesquisa, envolvimento em publicações, atividades de ensino, conferências científicas e apresentação de posteres); crenças relacionadas à Pesquisa em Enfermagem (habilidades, benefícios para a carreira, reputação da instituição, para o cuidado do paciente, satisfação no trabalho); e autoeficácia em pesquisa (conduzir revisão de literatura, avaliar a qualidade dos estudos, usar teoria; compreender as evidências e escrita científica: facilidade para colocar as ideias no papel, reconhecer e adaptar o texto para o leitor, escrever obedecendo os padrões requeridos pela ciência, escrever com objetividade, clareza e precisão; inserir as referências apropriadamente, usar corretamente a ortografia e gramática; escrever textos em inglês). RESULTADOS: A maioria dos enfermeiros clínicos tinha pouca experiência em pesquisa, todavia, demonstraram crenças positivas e percepção de habilidades de pesquisa bem desenvolvidas. CONCLUSÃO: Nossos achados devem contribuir para a elaboração de programas de pesquisa que objetivem facilitar o engajamento dos enfermeiros clínicos no desenvolvimento de projetos científicos.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the academic profile, research experience, beliefs, and self-efficacy in research of clinical nurses in a Magnet Journey™ hospital. METHODS: Quantitative descriptive designed to assess research experience of clinical nurses. The survey was divided into demographics characteristics; scientific/academic profile (Nursing degree; membership in academic research groups, involvement in papers, teaching activities, scientific conferences, and posters presented); beliefs related to nursing research (about skills, benefits to career, reputation of institution, patient care; job satisfaction level); and Research Self-Efficacy (conducting literature review; evaluating quality of studies; using theory; understanding evidence; and scientific writing: putting ideas on paper easily; recognize and adapt the text to the reader; write to the standards required by science; write with objectivity, logical sequence, coherence, simplicity, clarity, and precision; insert the references in the text correctly; write the references appropriately; use correct spelling and grammar; write texts in English). RESULTS: Most clinical nurses had low research experience, yet had positive beliefs in and perception of well-developed research skills. CONCLUSION: Our findings should contribute to the preparation of research programs aimed at facilitating the engagement of clinical nurses in the development of scientific projects.
Subject(s)
Humans , Nursing Research/trends , Self Efficacy , Brazil , Educational Status , Nurse Clinicians/classification , Urban PopulationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the academic profile, research experience, beliefs, and self-efficacy in research of clinical nurses in a Magnet Journey™ hospital. METHODS: Quantitative descriptive designed to assess research experience of clinical nurses. The survey was divided into demographics characteristics; scientific/academic profile (Nursing degree; membership in academic research groups, involvement in papers, teaching activities, scientific conferences, and posters presented); beliefs related to nursing research (about skills, benefits to career, reputation of institution, patient care; job satisfaction level); and Research Self-Efficacy (conducting literature review; evaluating quality of studies; using theory; understanding evidence; and scientific writing: putting ideas on paper easily; recognize and adapt the text to the reader; write to the standards required by science; write with objectivity, logical sequence, coherence, simplicity, clarity, and precision; insert the references in the text correctly; write the references appropriately; use correct spelling and grammar; write texts in English). RESULTS: Most clinical nurses had low research experience, yet had positive beliefs in and perception of well-developed research skills. CONCLUSION: Our findings should contribute to the preparation of research programs aimed at facilitating the engagement of clinical nurses in the development of scientific projects.
