ABSTRACT
Objective: Case reports, tissue pathology, and autopsies have suggested that the hydrophilic polymer coating designed to improve endovascular deliverability and minimize vessel trauma can embolize and be associated with adverse outcomes such as ischemia, infarction, and death. This study sought to determine whether hydrophilic polymers shed off commercially available sheaths in a controlled in vitro environment, with the hypothesis that significant differences between coated and uncoated (control) sheaths would be found. Methods: Six sheaths from each manufacturer, including Zenith Alpha abdominal endovascular stent grafts (Cook Medical), DrySeal sheaths (W.L. Gore & Associates), and Sentrant Introducer sheaths (Medtronic), were tested in an in vitro environment. Noncoated Check-Flo performer introducer sheaths (Cook Medical) were used as controls. Each test circuit ran for 150 minutes at an output of 3 L/min, the circuit was then drained and the fluid collected. Quantitative analysis included weighing the dried filter paper and using particle size light scattering to quantify the particle size and count. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy was also used. Results: Each of the three coated sheaths had significantly greater shedding compared with the control sheaths. The Cook Zenith alpha sheath had significantly more residue weight (2.87 ± 0.52 mg/L) than the Gore DrySeal (1.07 ± 0.06 mg/L) and Medtronic Sentrant introducer (0.98 ± 0.14 mg/L) sheaths. The average particle size was not significantly different between the coated and uncoated (control) sheaths. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy identified sheath particulate in the Cook Zenith Alpha and Medtronic Sentrant samples. Conclusions: Polymer embolization was present and significantly greater in all three commercially available hydrophilic sheaths compared with the control group. Further investigation is needed into the clinical significance of these findings.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a Mediterranean-style, ketogenic diet mobile health application (app) with breath acetone biofeedback is superior to a calorie-restricted, low-fat diet app in promoting weight loss. METHODS: Participants (n = 155) with overweight/obesity (mean [SD]: age 41 [11] years, BMI = 34 [5] kg/m2 , 71% female) were randomized to one of the interventions delivered entirely via app. Participants received a wireless scale and were instructed to take daily weight measurements. A third-party laboratory collected blood samples at baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Weight loss at 12 weeks was greater in the ketogenic (-5.6 kg; 95% CI: -6.7 kg to -4.5 kg) compared with the low-fat group (-2.5 kg; 95% CI: -3.6 kg to -1.4 kg) (between-group difference: -3.1 kg; 95% CI: -4.6 kg to -1.5 kg; p < 0.001). Weight loss at 24 weeks indicated durability of the effect (between-group difference: -5.5 kg; 95% CI: -8.3 kg to -2.8 kg; p < 0.001). Secondary/exploratory outcomes of hemoglobin A1c and liver enzymes were improved to a greater extent in the ketogenic diet group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with overweight/obesity, a ketogenic diet app with breath acetone biofeedback was superior to a calorie-restricted diet app at promoting weight loss in a real-world setting.
