Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Parasit Vectors ; 14(1): 348, 2021 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34210355

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common vector-borne disease in Europe. Monitoring changes in the prevalence of different Borrelia species in ticks may be an important indicator of risk assessment and of differences in pathogenicity in humans. The objective of our study was to assess the prevalence, co-infection and distribution of Borrelia and Babesia species in ticks removed from humans in a large sample collected during a study period of 4 years. METHODS: The ticks were collected throughout Poland from March to November over 4-year period from 2016 to 2019. All ticks (n = 1953) were morphologically identified in terms of species and developmental stage. Molecular screening for Borrelia and Babesia by amplification of the flagellin gene (flaB) or 18S rRNA marker was performed. Pathogen identity was confirmed by Sanger sequencing or PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. RESULTS: The ticks removed from humans in Poland during this study belonged to two species: Ixodes ricinus (97%) and Dermacentor reticulatus (3%). High Borrelia prevalence (25.3%), including B. miyamotoi (8.4%), was confirmed in Ixodes ricinus ticks removed from humans, as was the change in frequency of occurrence of Borrelia species during the 4-year study. Despite Babesia prevalence being relatively low (1.3%), the majority of tested isolates are considered to be pathogenic to humans. Babesia infection was observed more frequently among Borrelia-positive ticks (2.7%) than among ticks uninfected with Borrelia (0.8%). The most frequent dual co-infections were between Borrelia afzelii and Babesia microti. The presence of Borrelia was also confirmed in D. reticulatus (12.7%); however the role of these ticks in spirochete transmission to susceptible hosts is still unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall risk of developing LB after a tick bite is low in Europe, knowledge of the prevalence and distribution of Borrelia and Babesia species in ticks might be an important indicator of the risk of both these tick-borne diseases.


Subject(s)
Babesia/genetics , Babesiosis/epidemiology , Borrelia/genetics , Coinfection , Ixodes/microbiology , Ixodes/parasitology , Lyme Disease/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Animals , Babesia/isolation & purification , Babesia/pathogenicity , Borrelia/isolation & purification , Borrelia/pathogenicity , Coinfection/microbiology , Coinfection/parasitology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Poland/epidemiology , Prevalence , Tick-Borne Diseases/microbiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/parasitology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL