Impact of Insulin-Induced Relative Hypoglycemia on Vascular Insulin Sensitivity and Central Hemodynamics in Prediabetes.

CONTEXT: Relative hypoglycemia (RH) is linked to sympathetic responses that can alter vascular function in individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, less is known about the role of RH on hemodynamics or metabolic insulin sensitivity in prediabetes. OBJECTIVE: Determine if RH alters peripheral endothelial function or central hemodynamics to a greater extent in those with prediabetes (PD) versus normoglycemia (NG). METHODS: Seventy adults with obesity were classified using ADA criteria as PD (n=34 (28F); HbA1c=6.02±0.1%) or NG (n=36 (30F); HbA1c=5.4±0.0%). Brachial artery endothelial function, skeletal muscle capillary perfusion, and aortic waveforms were assessed at 0 and 120min of a euglycemic clamp (40 mU/m2/min, 90 mg/dl). Plasma nitrate/nitrite and endothelin-1 (ET-1) were measured as surrogates of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation and vasoconstriction, respectively. RH was defined as the drop in glucose (%) from fasting to clamp steady state. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, weight, or VO2max between groups. PD had higher HbA1c (P<0.01) and a greater drop in glucose in response to insulin (14 vs. 8%; P=0.03). Further, heart rate (HR) increased in NG compared to PD (P<0.01), while forward wave (Pf) decreased in PD (P=0.04). Insulin also tended to reduce arterial stiffness (cfPWV) in NG versus PD (P=0.07), despite similar increases in pre-occlusion diameter (P=0.02), blood flow (P=0.02), and lower augmentation index (AIx75) (P≤0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with NG, insulin-induced RH corresponded with a blunted rise in HR and drop in Pf during insulin infusion in adults with PD, independent of changes in peripheral endothelial function.

Early chronotype favors appetite and reduced later day caloric intake among adults with obesity.

Late chronotype (LC) is related to obesity and altered food intake throughout the day. But whether appetite perception and gut hormones differ among chronotypes is unclear. Thus, we examined if early chronotype (EC) have different appetite responses in relation to food intake than LC. Adults with obesity were categorized using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) as either EC (n = 21, 18F, MEQ = 63.9 ± 1.0, 53.7 ± 1.2 yr, 36.2 ± 1.1 kg/m2) and LC (n = 28, 24F, MEQ = 47.2 ± 1.5, 55.7 ± 1.4 yr, 37.1 ± 1.0 kg/m2). Visual analog scales were used during a 120 min 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 30 min intervals to assess appetite perception, as well as glucose, insulin, GLP-1 (glucagon-like polypeptide-1), GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotrophic peptide), PYY (protein tyrosine tyrosine), and acylated ghrelin. Dietary intake (food logs), resting metabolic rate (RMR; indirect calorimetry), aerobic fitness (maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max)), and body composition dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were also assessed. Age, body composition, RMR, and fasting appetite were similar between groups. However, EC had higher satisfaction and fullness as well as reduced desires for sweet, salty, savory, and fatty foods during the OGTT (P <0.05). Only GIP tAUC0-120 min was elevated in EC versus LC (p = 0.01). Daily dietary intake was similar between groups, but EC ate fewer carbohydrates (p = 0.05) and more protein (p = 0.01) at lunch. Further, EC had lower caloric (p = 0.03), protein (p = 0.03) and fat (p = 0.04) intake during afternoon snacking compared to LC. Dietary fat was lower, and carbohydrates was higher, in EC than LC (p = 0.05) at dinner. Low glucose and high insulin as well as GLP-1 tAUC60-120 min related to desires for sweet foods (p < 0.05). Taken together, EC had more favorable appetite and lower caloric intake later in the day compared with LC.

Intermediate versus morning chronotype has lower vascular insulin sensitivity in adults with obesity.

AIM: Chronotype reflects a circadian rhythmicity that regulates endothelial function. While the morning chronotype (MORN) usually has low cardiovascular disease risk, no study has examined insulin action on endothelial function between chronotypes. We hypothesized intermediate chronotypes (INT) would have lower vascular insulin sensitivity than morning chronotype (MORN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with obesity were classified per Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) as either MORN (n = 27, 22 female, MEQ = 63.7 ± 4.7, 53.8 ± 6.7 years, 35.3 ± 4.9 kg/m2) or INT (n = 29, 23 female, MEQ = 48.8 ± 6.7, 56.6 ± 9.0 years, 35.7 ± 6.1 kg/m2). A 120 min euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp (40 mU/m2/min, 90 mg/dl) was conducted to assess macrovascular insulin sensitivity via brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (%FMD; conduit artery), post-ischaemic flow velocity (resistance arteriole), as well as microvascular insulin sensitivity via contrast-enhanced ultrasound [e.g. microvascular blood volume (perfusion)]. Fasting plasma arginine and citrulline, as well as fasting and clamp-derived plasma endothelin-1 and nitrate/nitrite, were assessed as surrogates of vasoconstriction and nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation. Aerobic fitness (VO2max) and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were also collected. RESULTS: MORN had a higher VO2max compared with INT (p < .01), although there was no difference in fat mass. While fasting FMD was similar between groups, insulin lowered FMD corrected to shear stress and microvascular blood volume in INT compared with MORN after co-varying for VO2max (both p ≤ .02). INT also had a lower fasting nitrate (p = .03) and arginine (p = .07). Higher MEQ correlated with elevated FMD (r = 0.33, p = .03) and lower post-ischaemic flow velocity (r = -0.33, p = .03) as well as shear rate (r = -0.36, p = .02) at 120 min. CONCLUSION: When measured during the morning, INT had a lower vascular insulin sensitivity than MORN. Additional work is needed to understand endothelial function differences among chronotypes to optimize cardiovascular disease risk reduction.

Exercise blood pressure and heart rate responses to graded exercise testing in intermediate versus morning chronotypes with obesity.

Exaggerated exercise blood pressure (BP) is linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although evening chronotypes have greater CVD risk than morning (Morn) types, it is unknown if exercise BP differs in intermediate (Int) types. Adults with obesity were classified as either Morn [n = 23 (18 females), Morning-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) = 63.96 ± 1.0, 54.74 ± 1.4 yr, 33.7 ± 0.6 kg/m2] or Int [n = 23 (19 females), MEQ = 51.36 ± 1.1, 55.96 ± 1.8 yr, 37.2 ± 1.2 kg/m2] chronotype per MEQ. A graded, incremental treadmill test to maximal aerobic capacity (V̇o2max) was conducted. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure and mean arterial pressure (MAP), rate pressure product (RPP), heart rate (HR), and rate of perceived intensity (RPE) were determined at baseline, 4 min, 6 min, and maximal stages. HR recovery (HRR; maximum postexercise) was determined at 1 and 2 min postexercise. Preexercise fasted aortic waveforms (applanation tonometry), plasma leptin, nitrate/nitrite (nitric oxide bioavailability), and body composition (dual X-ray, DXA) were also collected. Int had lower V̇o2max and plasma nitrate (both P ≤ 0.02) than Morn. No difference in preexercise BP, aortic waveforms, or body composition were noted between groups, although higher plasma leptin was seen in Int compared with Morn (P = 0.04). Although Int had higher brachial DBP and MAP across exercise stages (both P ≤ 0.05) and higher HR, RPE, and RPP at 6 min of exercise (all P ≤ 0.05), covarying for V̇o2max nullified the BP, but not HR or RPE, difference. HRR was greater in Morn independent of V̇o2max (P = 0.046). Fasted leptin correlated with HR at exercise stage 4 (r = 0.421, P = 0.041) and 6 min (r = 0.593, P = 0.002). This observational study suggests that Int has exaggerated BP and HR responses to exercise compared with Morn, although fitness abolished BP differences.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study compares blood pressure and heart rate responses with graded, incremental exercise between morning and intermediate chronotype adults with obesity. Herein, blood pressure responses to exercise were elevated in intermediate compared with morning chronotype, although V̇o2max abolished this observation. However, heart rate responses to exercise were higher in intermediate vs. morning chronotypes independent of fitness. Collectively, this exercise hemodynamic response among intermediate chronotype may be related to reduced aerobic fitness, altered nitric oxide metabolism, and/or elevated aortic waveforms.

Aortic waveform responses to insulin in late versus early chronotype with metabolic syndrome.

Late chronotype (LC) correlates with reduced metabolic insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular disease. It is unclear if insulin action on aortic waveforms and inflammation is altered in LC versus early chronotype (EC). Adults with metabolic syndrome (n = 39, MetS) were classified as either EC (Morning-Eveningness Questionnaire [MEQ] = 63.5 ± 1.2) or LC (MEQ = 45.5 ± 1.3). A 120 min euglycemic clamp (40 mU/m2 /min, 90 mg/dL) with indirect calorimetry was used to determine metabolic insulin sensitivity (glucose infusion rate [GIR]) and nonoxidative glucose disposal (NOGD). Aortic waveforms via applanation tonometry and inflammation by blood biochemistries were assessed at 0 and 120 min of the clamp. LC had higher fat-free mass and lower VO2 max, GIR, and NOGD (between groups, all p ≤ 0.05) than EC. Despite no difference in 0 min waveforms, both groups had insulin-stimulated elevations in pulse pressure amplification with reduced AIx75 and augmentation pressure (AP; time effect, p ≤ 0.05). However, EC had decreased forward pressure (Pf; interaction effect, p = 0.007) with insulin versus rises in LC. Although LC had higher tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α; group effect, p ≤ 0.01) than EC, both LC and EC had insulin-stimulated increases in TNF-α and decreases in hs-CRP (time effect, both p ≤ 0.01). Higher MEQ scores related to greater insulin-stimulated reductions in AP (r = -0.42, p = 0.016) and Pf (r = -0.41, p = 0.02). VO2 max correlated with insulin-mediated reductions in AIx75 (r = -0.56, p < 0.01) and AP (r = -0.49, p < 0.01). NOGD related to decreased AP (r = -0.44, p = 0.03) and Pf (r = -0.43, p = 0.04) during insulin infusion. LC was depicted by blunted forward pressure waveform responses to insulin and higher TNF-α in MetS. More work is needed to assess endothelial function across chronotypes.

Early chronotype with metabolic syndrome favours resting and exercise fat oxidation in relation to insulin-stimulated non-oxidative glucose disposal.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? Chronotype reflects differences in circadian-mediated metabolic and hormonal profiles. But, does resting and/or exercise fuel use differ in early versus late chronotype as it relates to insulin sensitivity? What are the main finding and its importance? Early chronotypes with metabolic syndrome utilized more fat during rest and exercise independent of aerobic fitness when compared with late chronotypes. Early chronotypes were also more physically active throughout the day. Greater fat use was related to non-oxidative glucose disposal. These findings suggest that early chronotypes have differences in fuel selection that associate with type 2 diabetes risk. ABSTRACT: Early chronotypes (ECs) are often insulin-sensitive, in part, due to physical activity behaviour. It is unclear, however, if chronotypes differ in resting and/or exercise fuel oxidation in relation to insulin action. Using the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), adults with metabolic syndrome (ATP III criteria) were classified as EC (MEQ = 63.7 ± 0.9, n = 24 (19F), 54.2 ± 1.2 years) or late chronotype (LC; MEQ = 47.2 ± 1.4, n = 27 (23F), 55.3 ± 1.5 years). Carbohydrate (CHO) and fat oxidation (FOX, indirect calorimetry) were determined at rest, 55% and 85% V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot{V}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{\rm{2}}{\rm{max}}}$ , along with heart rate and rating of perceived exertion. Physical activity patterns (accelerometers), body composition (DXA) and insulin sensitivity (clamp, 40 mU/m2 /min, 90 mg/dl) with an indirect calorimetry for non-oxidative glucose disposal (NOGD) were also determined. While demographics were similar, ECs had higher V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot{V}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{\rm{2}}{\rm{max}}}$ (P = 0.02), NOGD (P < 0.001) and resting FOX (P = 0.02) than LCs. Both groups increased CHO reliance during exercise at 55% and 85% V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot{V}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{\rm{2}}{\rm{max}}}$ (test effect, P < 0.01) from rest, although ECs used more fat (group effect, P < 0.01). ECs had lower sedentary behaviour and more physical activity during morning/midday (both, P < 0.05). FOX at 55% V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot{V}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{\rm{2}}{\rm{max}}}$ correlated with V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot{V}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{\rm{2}}{\rm{max}}}$ (r = 0.425, P = 0.004) whereas FOX at 85% V ̇ O 2 max ${\dot{V}}_{{{\rm{O}}}_{\rm{2}}{\rm{max}}}$ related to NOGD (r = 0.392, P = 0.022). ECs with metabolic syndrome used more fat in relation to insulin-stimulated NOGD.

Insulin Sensitivity and Metabolic Flexibility Parallel Plasma TCA Levels in Early Chronotype With Metabolic Syndrome.

CONTEXT: People characterized as late chronotype have elevated type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk compared to early chronotype. It is unclear how chronotype is associated with insulin sensitivity, metabolic flexibility, or plasma TCA cycle intermediates concentration, amino acids (AA), and/or beta-oxidation. OBJECTIVE: This study examined these metabolic associations with chronotype. METHODS: The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) was used to classify adults with metabolic syndrome (ATP III criteria) as either early (n = 15 [13F], MEQ = 64.7 ±â€…1.4) or late (n = 19 [16F], MEQ = 45.5 ±â€…1.3) chronotype. Fasting bloods determined hepatic (HOMA-IR) and adipose insulin resistance (Adipose-IR) while a 120-minute euglycemic clamp (40 mU/m2/min, 5 mmoL/L) was performed to test peripheral insulin sensitivity (glucose infusion rate). Carbohydrate (CHOOX) and fat oxidation (FOX), as well as nonoxidative glucose disposal (NOGD), were also estimated (indirect calorimetry). Plasma tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) intermediates, AA, and acyl-carnitines were measured along with VO2max and body composition (DXA). RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in age, BMI, fat-free mass, VO2max, or ATP III criteria between groups. Early chronotype, however, had higher peripheral insulin sensitivity (P = 0.009) and lower HOMA-IR (P = 0.02) and Adipose-IR (P = 0.05) compared with late chronotype. Further, early chronotype had higher NOGD (P = 0.008) and greater insulin-stimulated CHOOX (P = 0.02). While fasting lactate (P = 0.01), TCA intermediates (isocitrate, α-ketoglutarate, succinate, fumarate, malate; all P ≤ 0.04) and some AA (proline, isoleucine; P = 0.003-0.05) were lower in early chronotype, other AA (threonine, histidine, arginine; all P ≤ 0.05) and most acyl-carnitines were higher (P ≤ 0.05) compared with late chronotype. CONCLUSION: Greater insulin sensitivity and metabolic flexibility relates to plasma TCA concentration in early chronotype.

Considerations for Maximizing the Exercise "Drug" to Combat Insulin Resistance: Role of Nutrition, Sleep, and Alcohol.

Insulin resistance is a key etiological factor in promoting not only type 2 diabetes mellitus but also cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exercise is a first-line therapy for combating chronic disease by improving insulin action through, in part, reducing hepatic glucose production and lipolysis as well as increasing skeletal muscle glucose uptake and vasodilation. Just like a pharmaceutical agent, exercise can be viewed as a "drug" such that identifying an optimal prescription requires a determination of mode, intensity, and timing as well as consideration of how much exercise is done relative to sitting for prolonged periods (e.g., desk job at work). Furthermore, proximal nutrition (nutrient timing, carbohydrate intake, etc.), sleep (or lack thereof), as well as alcohol consumption are likely important considerations for enhancing adaptations to exercise. Thus, identifying the maximal exercise "drug" for reducing insulin resistance will require a multi-health behavior approach to optimize type 2 diabetes and CVD care.