ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lumbar puncture (LP) is an invasive medical procedure that can be done by any doctor. Several simulation-based trainings have been built however the evaluations of the theoretical knowledge and the impact of the simulation-based training have never been performed in real life. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a LP training on the theoretical knowledge improvement and the performance of a LP in clinical practice. METHODS: Before and after medical students' training, theoretical knowledge and confidence level were assessed. Over a 6 months period, the impact of simulation training was evaluated by the success rate of students' first LP carried out in hospitalized patients and compared to the results of a no-training control. RESULTS: Students' theoretical knowledge and confidence level showed significant improvement after simulation training on 115 students (p < 0.0001). The evaluation in real life based on 41 students showed that the success rate of the first LP in patients was higher in the LP simulation group compared to the control group (67% vs 14%, p = 0.0025). The technical assistance was also less frequently needed in the LP simulation group (19% vs 57%, respectively, p = 0.017). The rate of students who participated in this educational study was low. DISCUSSION: Simulation-based teaching was an effective way to improve students' theoretical and practical knowledge. Whether this approach translates to other procedural skills in real clinical settings merits further study. The low participation rate in the study is due to the fact that students are not used to be included in educational studies and to the complexity of evaluation in routine clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Physicians , Simulation Training , Students, Medical , Clinical Competence , Humans , Spinal PunctureABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We report the implementation of a large-scale simulation-based cardiovascular diagnostics course for undergraduate medical students. METHODS: A simulation-based course was integrated into the curriculum of second-year medical students (> 400 students/year). The first session aimed at teaching cardiac auscultation skills on mannequins and the second at teaching blood pressure measurement, peripheral arterial examination, and the clinical examination of heart failure in a technical skill-based manner and in a scenario. RESULTS: A total of 414 (99.8%) and 402 (98.5%) students, as well as 102 and 104 educators, participated during the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 academic years across both types of sessions. The number of positive appreciations by students was high and improved from the first to the second year (session 1: 77% vs. 98%, session 2: 89% vs. 98%; p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed for educators (session 1: 84% vs. 98%, p = 0.007; session 2: 82% vs. 98%, p = 0.01). Feedbacks by students were positive regarding the usefulness of the course, fulfillment of pedagogical objectives, quality of the teaching method, time management, and educator-student interactivity. In contrast, 95% of students criticized the quality of the mannequins during the first year leading to the replacement of the simulation material the following year. Students most appreciated the auscultation workshop (25%), the practical aspect of the course (22%), and the availability of educators (21%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the need to commit significant human and material resources, the implementation of this large-scale program involving > 400 students/year was feasible, and students and educators reacted favorably.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Clinical Competence/standards , Computer Simulation , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Physical Examination/standards , Students, Medical , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Female , Heart Auscultation/methods , Humans , Male , Manikins , Pilot Projects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although most societies of obstetrics advocate vaginal delivery of twins, there has been a steady rise in the rate of twin cesarean sections. We risk perhaps losing in a single generation our obstetrical learning and skills because of medicolegal and emotionally charged issues. METHODS: We have therefore designed a realistic as possible simulation model of second twin delivery and tested it on residents in obstetrics. FINDINGS: Between two trials, we noted a significant improvement in the time required for internal podalic version and breech extraction. We also observed a significant improvement in the confidence score between the two trials. INTERPRETATION: We have designed a simulation device that improves obstetrical skills for second twin delivery and which we hope will participate in the comeback of vaginal delivery for this indication and contribute to the fight against the dangerous trend of rising rates of cesarean delivery for twins. Our model completely fits the paradigm of simulation in medical pedagogy.