FRACTURES OF THE PERONEAL MALLEOLUS: CURRENT CONCEPTS. / FRACTURAS DEL MALÉOLO PERONEO: CONCEPTOS ACTUALES.

Ankle fractures represent up to 9% of all fractures, with an increased incidence in the elderly population. Among these fractures, isolated fractures of the lateral malleolus are the most common, representing 65-70% of all cases. The therapeutic decision-making primarily relies on the stability of the ankle ring, considering it stable if affected at one point and unstable if two or more points are affected. Surgical treatment focuses on restoring the length of the fibula, joint reconstruction, stabilizing the syndesmosis, and providing a stable fixation. It is crucial to rule out associated injuries that may influence therapeutic management. This article reviews the evaluation and management of lateral malleolus fractures, proposes a decision-making algorithm, and examines several fibular fixation options.

Neurological Injuries after Calcaneal Osteotomies Are Underdiagnosed.

The incidence of peripheral neurological injuries related to calcaneal osteotomies reported in the literature is low and often described as occasional. The main objective of this study is to determine the incidence of neurological injuries after calcaneal osteotomies and identify which nerve structures are most affected. This retrospective work included 69 patients. Medical records, surgical protocols, and radiographs were analyzed. All patients were summoned to perform current functional tests (EFAS score and SF-12), and a thorough physical examination was performed systematically and bilaterally. The total incidence of neurological injuries was 43.5% (30/69). The percentage of neurapraxias (transient injuries) was 8.7%, while 34.8% of patients presented neurological sequelae (permanent injuries). The most injured nerve or branch was, in decreasing order: sural nerve, medial plantar branch, lateral plantar branch and medial calcaneal branch. Following the so-called "safe zone" clearly decreases the incidence of sural nerve injury (p = 0.035). No significant differences were found between osteotomy site, number of screws, and type of closure and increased neurological injuries. No significant differences were found in the functional tests between the different techniques, nor between patients who presented neurological injuries and those who did not. Neurological injuries after calcaneal osteotomies are underdiagnosed and the incidence is higher than previously reported (43.5%). Such injuries mostly go unnoticed and have no implications in the functional results and patients' satisfaction.

"Safe incision" in calcaneal sliding osteotomies reduces the incidence of sural nerve injury.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate whether application of the so-called safe incision when performing calcaneal sliding osteotomies reduces the risk of sural nerve injury. METHODS: Patients who underwent either medial or lateral sliding calcaneal osteotomies between 2010 and 2018 were analysed retrospectively. A thorough neurological examination was performed, and the location of the surgical wound and the type of wound closure were recorded. The European Foot and Ankle Surgery (EFAS) score and 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) were also documented. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were included, of which 20 (35.1%) had a sural nerve injury. Five patients had a neurapraxia (8.8%), while 15 patients had a permanent injury (26.3%). Respecting the "safe incision" decreased sural nerve injury (p = 0.02). The type of osteotomy and closure was not significant. No significant differences were found in the functional tests between the different techniques, or between patients who presented sural nerve injury and those who did not. CONCLUSION: Sural nerve injury after calcaneal sliding osteotomies is higher than previously reported in the scientific literature, with an incidence of 35.1% (20/57 patients). Respecting the so-called safe zone (oblique incision that runs through the point that is > 1/3 of the distance from the tip of the lateral malleolus to the posteroinferior margin of the calcaneus) clearly decreases the incidence of sural nerve injury. Finally, the majority of patients remained asymptomatic despite the neurological injury.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion With Antibiotic Cement-Coated Nails for Refractory Deep Infection After Ankle ORIF.

BACKGROUND: Deep infection after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures represents a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon, particularly in patients in whom conventional surgical treatments have failed. The aim of this study was to assess the results of a modified technique of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion using a retrograde locked intramedullary nail covered in cement with antibiotics. METHODS: Six patients treated using the authors' technique were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had deep infection after ankle osteosynthesis and several surgical procedures (debridement, external fixation, etc) had failed. Radiographs were analyzed to confirm the healing of the bone. Outcome was measured by maintained construct stability and eradication of infection (no clinical signs of infection and normal values of laboratory markers). The average age of the series was 64.2 (range, 50-75) years, and the average follow-up period was 19.5 (range, 8-41) months. RESULTS: Tibiotalocalcaneal stability and eradication of the infection were achieved in all patients, along with the normalization of clinical and radiologic parameters. In the patient who underwent a talectomy, one of the calcaneal locking screws broke, with no clinical repercussions. CONCLUSION: Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with antibiotic cement-coated retrograde nails was useful in providing clinically acceptable results in the control of chronic infection in complex patients after the failure of previous surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Prevalence of bone marrow edema in a study population with foot and/or ankle pain.

Bone marrow edema (BME) is an imaging diagnosis defined by an abnormal accumulation of intraosseous interstitial fluid within a bone on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigation. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of BME in patients with foot and/or ankle pain studied using MRI. This was a retrospective observational work on patient cases and controls studied through MRI of the foot and/or ankle at our Foot and Ankle Unit (FAU). An analytical statistical analysis and a multivariate analysis were performed to eliminate possible confounding factors. 1950 foot and/or ankle MRI cases were reviewed, of which 451 presented bone edema (23% prevalence). The average patient age was 51.8 (range, 7-87); the talus bone was most frequently affected: post-traumatic in 43.5% of cases, degenerative in 34.7% and there was no specific cause identified in 6.3% (these cases were termed 'idiopathic'). With regards to risk factors, in the case of gender, the odds ratio (OR) of men suffering bone oedema was 1.5 times higher than that of women (P = 0.003); for immunosuppression the OR was 3.4 times higher (P = 0.001); while among those with a smoking habit it was 0.59 (P = 0.001), meaning that after ruling smoking out as a possible confounding factor, it was, in fact, revealed to be a protective factor. The prevalence of bone edema in MRI in patients with foot and/or ankle pain was 23%. The average patient was male, aged approximately 50, with traumatic or degenerative origin talus bone oedema. Level of Evidence: Level IV, revision observational study.