Emergency Department Screening and Interventions for Adolescents With Substance Use: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent substance use is a growing public health concern, particularly given rising mortality rates from drug overdose deaths. The emergency department (ED) provides a unique opportunity to screen adolescents for substance use and provide brief interventions and linkage to care. OBJECTIVE OF THE REVIEW: This article provides a narrative review of the current evidence for ED screening and brief interventions for adolescents with substance use and identifies important opportunities, challenges, and areas for future research. DISCUSSION: There are several validated substance use screening and assessment tools for use with adolescents that can be implemented into ED screening programs. Brief motivational interviewing interventions may reduce alcohol use, but evidence for reductions of other substances is limited due to insufficient research. Both screening and interventions are feasible and acceptable in the ED setting with the appropriate resources. Increased training and the use of emerging technology can provide emergency physicians with opportunities to incorporate these tools into practice to when treating adolescents. Linkage to outpatient care for adolescents with substance use is understudied. The research on adult patient ED interventions and linkage to care is more robust and can provide insights for future ED studies among adolescents. CONCLUSION: ED-based adolescent substance use screening and interventions are necessary, feasible, and acceptable, but understudied. Future studies, focusing on optimizing ED interventions and linkage to care, are important next steps in determining the best care for adolescents with substance use who present to the ED.

Clozapine Toxicity in Two Young Siblings Due to a Pharmacy Dispensing Error: a Pediatric Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic used to treat refractory schizophrenia; in both therapeutic use and overdose, it can cause significant toxicity. We report two young siblings who developed altered mental status after ingesting clozapine due to a pharmacy dispensing error. CASE REPORT: A 5-year-old girl and her 19-month-old sister presented to the emergency department (ED) with altered mental status after they took their first dose of what was believed to be cimetidine, prescribed to treat molluscum contagiosum. Both children were discharged after a brief period of observation in the ED. Two days later, when the older child continued to be symptomatic, their mother used a web-based pill identifier and discovered that the pills dispensed by the pharmacy were 200 mg clozapine tablets, not the cimetidine that had been prescribed. Ingestion was confirmed with an elevated serum clozapine concentration in the older child of 17 mcg/L at 85 hours post-ingestion (adult therapeutic range: 350-600 mcg/L). Both children had complete resolution of their symptoms 4 days following the ingestion with supportive care alone. DISCUSSION: We report two cases of pediatric clozapine toxicity due to a pharmacy dispensing error. The error was due, in part, to similarly named medications being stored adjacent to each other on a shelf. Dispensing errors are not rare occurrences and their root causes are multi-factorial. This case demonstrates the importance of reducing such errors, particularly for medications with potential for severe toxicity.

Caregiver Practices and Knowledge Regarding Leftover Prescription Medications in Homes With Children.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to determine the frequency of and factors associated with leftover or expired prescription medication ("leftover medication") presence in homes with children and to assess caregivers' reported behaviors and knowledge regarding disposal of leftover medications in the home. METHODS: This study is a planned secondary analysis from a survey of primary caregivers of children aged 1 to 17 years presenting to an emergency department. The survey assessed leftover medications in the home and medication disposal practices, knowledge, and guidance. The survey was developed iteratively and pilot tested. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with leftover medication presence in the home. RESULTS: We enrolled 550 primary caregivers; 97 of the 538 analyzed (18.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.8-21.5) reported having leftover medications in their home, most commonly antibiotics and opioids. Of respondents, 217/536 (40.5%) reported not knowing how to properly dispose of medications and only 88/535 (16.4%) reported receiving guidance regarding medication disposal. Most caregivers reported throwing leftover medications in the trash (55.7%) or flushing them down the toilet (38.5%). Caregivers with private insurance for their child were more likely to have leftover medications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.99; CI, 1.15-3.44), whereas Hispanic caregivers (aOR, 0.24; CI, 0.14-0.42) and those who received guidance on leftover medications (aOR, 0.30; CI, 0.11-0.81) were less likely to have leftover medications in the home. CONCLUSIONS: Leftover medications are commonly stored in homes with children and most caregivers do not receive guidance on medication disposal. Improved education and targeted interventions are needed to ensure proper medication disposal practices.

Temporal Trends in Opioid Prescribing Practices in Children, Adolescents, and Younger Adults in the US From 2006 to 2018.

Importance: Prescription opioids are involved in more than half of opioid overdoses among younger persons. Understanding opioid prescribing practices is essential for developing appropriate interventions for this population. Objective: To examine temporal trends in opioid prescribing practices in children, adolescents, and younger adults in the US from 2006 to 2018. Design, Setting, and Participants: A population-based, cross-sectional analysis of opioid prescription data was conducted from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2018. Longitudinal data on retail pharmacy-dispensed opioids for patients younger than 25 years were used in the analysis. Data analysis was performed from December 26, 2019, to July 8, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Opioid dispensing rate, mean amount of opioid dispensed in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day (individuals aged 15-24 years) or MME per kilogram per day (age <15 years), duration of prescription (mean, short [≤3 days], and long [≥30 days] duration), high-dosage prescriptions, and extended-release or long-acting (ER/LA) formulation prescriptions. Outcomes were calculated for age groups: 0 to 5, 6 to 9, 10 to 14, 15 to 19, and 20 to 24 years. Joinpoint regression was used to examine opioid prescribing trends. Results: From 2006 to 2018, the opioid dispensing rate for patients younger than 25 years decreased from 14.28 to 6.45, with an annual decrease of 15.15% (95% CI, -17.26% to -12.99%) from 2013 to 2018. The mean amount of opioids dispensed and rates of short-duration and high-dosage prescriptions decreased for all age groups older than 5 years, with the largest decreases in individuals aged 15 to 24 years. Mean duration per prescription increased initially for all ages, but then decreased for individuals aged 10 years or older. The duration remained longer than 5 days across all ages. The rate of long-duration prescriptions increased for all age groups younger than 15 years and initially increased, but then decreased after 2014 for individuals aged 15 to 24 years. For children aged 0 to 5 years dispensed an opioid, annual increases from 2011 to 2014 were noted for the mean amount of opioids dispensed (annual percent change [APC], 10.58%; 95% CI, 1.77% to 20.16%) and rates of long-duration (APC, 30.42%; 95% CI, 14.13% to 49.03%), high-dosage (APC, 31.27%; 95% CI, 16.81% to 47.53%), and ER/LA formulation (APC, 27.86%; 95% CI, 12.04% to 45.91%) prescriptions, although the mean amount dispensed and rate of high-dosage prescriptions decreased from 2014 to 2018. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that opioid dispensing rates decreased for patients younger than 25 years, with decreasing rates of high-dosage and long-duration prescriptions for adolescents and younger adults. However, opioids remain readily dispensed, and possible high-risk prescribing practices appear to be common, especially in younger children.

Frequency of and Factors Associated With Prescription Medication Sharing Within Families.

OBJECTIVES: Limited literature has investigated caregiver sharing of prescription medications with children. Our primary aim was to determine the frequency of and factors associated with prescription medication sharing within families. Our secondary aim was to determine the source and type of medications shared. METHODS: We conducted a survey of a convenience sample of caregivers of children 1 to 17 years in a pediatric emergency department. The survey was developed through literature review, iterative feedback, and pilot testing on caregivers. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with any history of medication sharing with a child in the home (primary outcome). RESULTS: We enrolled 550 primary caregivers; 68 of the 535 analyzed (12.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0-15.8) reported prescription medication sharing with their child/children. Of those who shared, 50 (73.5%) shared asthma medications and 14 (20.6%) shared antibiotics. Of the caregivers who shared prescription medications, 70.6% shared a medication for one child with another child, whereas 33.8% of caregivers shared their own or another adult's medication with their child. A child in the home with asthma (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.35; CI, 1.82-6.17), a greater number of children in the household (aOR, 1.29; CI, 1.04-1.60), and a caregiver who previously shared medications with other family members and/or friends (aOR, 4.10; CI, 1.84-9.15) were factors independently associated with medication sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription medication sharing within families is common and most often involves asthma medications. We identified several factors associated with prescription medication sharing that could be used to target caregivers for preventative interventions.

Scratching the surface: a review of skin and soft tissue infections in children.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We present data from recently conducted research on the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in children. RECENT FINDINGS: Current research in the area of SSTIs (cellulitis and abscess) has focused on the use of ultrasound, risk factors associated with bacteremia, antibiotic choice, and incision and drainage (I&D) practices. When clinical examination is equivocal at distinguishing abscess from cellulitis, ultrasound can aid in the diagnosis and alter management. Bacteremia is rare in immunocompetent children with uncomplicated SSTIs; blood cultures may be reserved for complicated cases and for those who are systemically ill. Despite the increased prevalence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA), I&D without antibiotics remains the first-line therapy for abscess. Antibiotics for uncomplicated cellulitis should target ß-hemolytic streptococci and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). There are significant variations in pain and sedation practices for I&D, with substantive evidence for the use of topical anesthetics. Wound packing after I&D may not confer significant benefit. SUMMARY: Evidence to aid in the diagnosis and management of SSTIs in children has emerged in recent years; however, larger prospective pediatric studies are needed.