ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Prospective evaluation of symptoms and quality of life before and after surgical treatment of endometriosis with bowel involvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Changes in symptoms, sexuality and quality of life before and after surgery of 41 patients operated for bowel endometriosis at the centre hospitalier de Versailles (CHV) were assessed with a self-assessment questionnaire. Pains were assessed using five visual analog scales, symptoms using 26 questions with a four-level Likert item, sexuality using the SEXACQ, and quality of life using the EHP-5 and the EQ-5D VAS. RESULTS: Surgical treatment improves pain: VAS scores for main pain (P<0.0001), dysmenorrhea (P=0.0039), defecation pain (P=0.0312), non-cyclic pelvic pain (P=0.0002), and dyspareunia (P=0.0084). Twelve intestinal symptoms are improved, including three significantly. It also improves SEXACQ score (P=0.0068) and quality of life scores EHP-5 and EQ-5D VAS (P=0.0001 and P=0.0003 respectively). No difference was found between disk resection and segmental resection in terms of symptoms, sexuality and quality of life. Histological analysis suggests that when a segmental resection is done, the stage of the endometriosis bowel involvement is more advanced. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Surgery of bowel endometriosis improves symptoms and quality of life. When the stage of the bowel endometriosis is advanced, a segmental resection should be done. Moreover, self-assessment questionnaire used at the CHV seems an appropriate tool to evaluate functional outcome.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/surgery , Intestinal Diseases/surgery , Quality of Life , Adult , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Sexuality , Surveys and Questionnaires , Visual Analog Scale , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to demonstrate the feasibility of the laparoscopic robot-assisted anterior and posterior mesh sacrocolpopexy compared to the laparoscopic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2009 and August 2011, 36 women underwent sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior mesh, 16 by a robot-assisted approach and 20 by laparoscopy. The cases were systematically evaluated at 1 and 12 months postoperatively. All cases were contacted 6 months later to evaluate the functional results. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in terms of age, ASA score, Body Mass Index, surgical history and grades of pelvic organ prolapse preoperatively. There was no difference in terms of hospital stay, per- and postoperative complications, especially concerning the rate of postoperative constipation. The mean operating time was significantly more important in the Robot group (P=0.001) with 318 min for the Robot group versus 260 min for the laparoscopic group. With a mean follow-up of 12 months, the anatomic result was satisfactory without recurrence in 97.2% of the cases. The urinary and sexual results, the restart of a sexual activity postoperatively, the surgical satisfaction and the return to daily activities were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy seems to be a reliable technique with morbidity, anatomic and functional outcomes comparable to that of laparoscopy.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Robotics , Surgical Mesh , Uterine Prolapse/surgery , Aged , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Since 2002, Conceptus company markets in France and Europe the Essure microinsert as permanent hysteroscopic intratubal sterilization, and organizes a meeting, a training and an assistance on a few cases. The data from this interview and the results of the first cases done with assistance of Conceptus instructors were collected prospectively between January 2004 to December 2006. The purpose is to make a state of the art about teaching hysteroscopy to gynaecologist surgeons in France and in Europe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: According to their statements about their knowledge of hysteroscopy practice, surgeons were classified in four groups. Group 1 included those who had a bad knowledge and a sporadic practice, group 2 those who had no formation and an empirical practice, group 3 those who had a regular practice and an incomplete formation or whose formation was in progress and group 4 those with fully-formed surgeons with a regular practice. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and fourty-four women underwent hysteroscopic sterilisation with a global success rate of 92.13%. Were included 536 surgeons and 498 were evaluated. There were 80 (16.06%) surgeons in group 1, 149 (29.92%) in group 2, 121 (24.30%) in group 3 and 148 (29.72%) in group 4. Failure rates for each group were respectively 16.25%, 10.07%, 9.10% and 4.73% (p < or = 0.01). The presence of an instructor was associated with a fast improvement judging from the classification in a higher level group in 47.83%, 28.21% and 25% respectively for the groups 1 to 3 after the second visit and in 75%, 58.33% and 20% after the third visit. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: It seems important to establish a modern and low-cost teaching program to improve surgeon's theoretical and practical formation in hysteroscopy in order to increase success rates and reduce possible complications. Theoretical formation has to include a good knowledge of the material and its use: diameter and form of the operative channel, obliquity of the scope, liquid of distension and kind of current used. Practical formation could be done at once with virtual models to get used with the manipulation of the scope and thanks to the use of different currents with the assistance of a trained surgeon.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/education , Hysteroscopy/methods , Sterilization, Tubal , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/education , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Europe , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Hysteroscopy/adverse effects , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Sterilization, Tubal/education , Sterilization, Tubal/methods , Sterilization, Tubal/standards , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to develop a French version of an English quality of life questionnaire specific of endometriosis: endometriosis health profile 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After many translations and reverse translations, we got a first French version of EHP 5. This scale was then distributed in two centres: Poissy and Versailles. This questionnaire was completed by women with endometriosis proven and chronic pain. We studied acceptability and feasibility. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included. All items have been completed satisfactorily. Our version was described as understandable and easy to complete. CONCLUSION: Our work consisted in developing a French version of EHP 5 which was very well received by the patient. However, the psychometric and clinical validation remains to be done.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/psychology , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Language , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Sickness Impact Profile , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic surgery of deep endometriosis, including uterosacral ligament and rectal localisation, generally induces postoperative urinary disorders, caused by sacral plexus nerve lesions. However, during presurgical consultation, patients with these symptoms frequently present some urinary disorders. Our objective was to prospectively evaluate the reality of pre-existant urinary disorders by performing urodynamic tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a prospective, descriptive and non-comparative study about 12 consecutive patients consulting for a surgical assumption of deep endometriosis, including clinical and radiological lesions on the uterosacral ligaments, on the uterine torus and/or on the rectum. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients whose ages ranged from 24 to 42 (mean age 34.6 +/-5.3 years). The mean parity was 0.5+/- 0.8 children (0-2). A clinical examination and multiple preoperative imaging techniques (abdominopelvic ultrasonography [US] and Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI]) were used to diagnose a deep endometriosis. During consultation, four patients presented no urinary dysfunction (33%). The eight other patients presented at least one of the following symptoms: increased daytime frequency, urinary incontinence, straining, increased night time frequency, urgency, mictional burns, bladder cramps, reduction in the bladder sensation. Any urinary infection was systematically eliminated. Multiple imaging techniques allowed to diagnose: an adnexal lesion in three cases (25%), adenomyosis in three cases (25%). Endometriosis was detected on the rectum in eight cases (66.7%), on the uterine torus in nine cases (75%) and on the uterosacral ligaments in 10 cases (83.3%). No vesical localisation was found. The urodynamic tests performed before surgery were totally normal in only two cases (16.7%). Three patients had a true postmictional residue (25%), but only one was pathological (more than 100 mL). The mean urethral fence pressure was 87.8 +/- 33.5 cm H20 (38-150). Four patients had a urethral hypertonia (30%), three patients a urethral instability (25%), three patients a dysuria (25%), two patients a hypersensitive bladder (16.7%), two patients had an insufficiency of the urethral sphincter (16.7%), one patient a big hypoesthetic bladder (8.3%) and one patient a small bladder capacity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Patients with deep endometriosis on the uterosacral ligaments and/or on the former face of the rectum frequently have urinary disorders. Consulting such patients is fundamental since it allows to diagnose them but it is not sufficient. Performing urodynamic tests can precisely determine and quantify real disorders. These disorders are neurological, probably related to lesions of the inferior hypogastric plexus and not to a lesion of the bladder. In this prospective study, there is no correlation between the preoperative disorders and the localisation of the lesions. A further study on a greater number of patients is necessary to define possible improvements and complications related to the surgery.
Subject(s)
Endometriosis/surgery , Ureteral Diseases/etiology , Urinary Bladder Diseases/etiology , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pelvis/injuries , Pelvis/innervation , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Diseases/prevention & control , Urinary Bladder Diseases/prevention & control , UrodynamicsABSTRACT
No symptom is pathognomonic for endometriosis. Main symptoms are pain (chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, pain on defecation, cyclic pain) and infertility (grade C). There is no relation between rAFS endometriosis classification and symptoms intensity and frequency (grade B). Endometriosic lesions location and symptoms type are related to each other as well as symptoms intensity and lesions deepness or adhesion numbers (grade B). Clinical evidence is the same for infertile endometriosic women (grade C). Screening for depression is required among patients suffering from chronic endometriosic pelvic pain (grade C). Clinical examination includes: 1) retrocervix area inspection as well as upper part of posterior vaginal wall in search for typical bluish lesions (grade B); 2) vaginal examination in search for: a) uterosacral ligaments nodules (grade B); b) pain in uterosacral ligaments extension (grade B); 3) re-examination during menstruation increases its performance (grade B). No biological check-up in endometriosis diagnosis is necessary (grade A). CA 125 increase is related to: endometriomas and deep lesions volume (grade B), surgically treated infertile women prognosis (grade B). Presurgical endometriosis diagnosis is bettered by using diagnosis pattern in selected population (grade B). Rating scales are recommended in diagnosis and therapeutic follow up (grade B). Quality of life scales are useful to evaluate therapeutic efficiency (grade B).